Ranganathan’s elucidation of subject in the light of ‘Infinity (∞)’

Dutta, Bidyarthi Ranganathan’s elucidation of subject in the light of ‘Infinity (∞)’. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2015, vol. 62, n. 4, pp. 255-264. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Ranganathan-Subject-Infinity.pdf] Text
Ranganathan-Subject-Infinity.pdf
Download (137kB)

English abstract

This paper reviews Ranganathan’s description of subject from mathematical angle. Ranganathan was highly influenced by Nineteenth Century mathematician George Cantor and he used the concept of infinity in developing an axiomatic interpretation of subject. Majority of library scientists interpreted the concept of subject merely as a term or descriptor or heading to include the same in cataloguing and subject indexing. Some library scientists interpreted subject on the basis of document, i.e. from the angle of the concept of aboutness or epistemological potential of the document etc. Some people explained subject from the viewpoint of social, cultural or socio-cultural process. Attempts were made to describe subject from epistemological viewpoint. But S R Ranganathan was the first to develop an axiomatic concept of subject on its own. He built up an independent idea of subject that is ubiquitously pervasive with human cognition process. To develop the basic foundation of subject, he used the mathematical concepts of infinity and infinitesimal and construed the set of subjects or universe of subjects as continuous infinite universe. The subject may also exist in extremely micro-form, which was termed as spot subject and analogized with point, which is dimensionless having only an existence. The influence of Twentieth Century physicist George Gamow on Ranganathan’s thought has also been discussed.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Subject; Continuous Infinite Universe; S R Ranganathan; Ranganathan’s school; Infinity; Infinitesimal; George Cantor; George Gamow; Set theory
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Bidyarthi Dutta
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2016 23:51
Last modified: 06 Jul 2016 23:51
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29514

References

Cutter C A, Rules for a dictionary catalog, (Government Printing Office; Washington DC) 1904.

Drake C L, What is a subject? Australian Library Journal, 9 (1960) 34-41.

Wilson P, Two kinds of power: an essay on bibliographical control, (University of California Press; Berkeley) 1968.

Hutchins W J, Languages of indexing and classification: a linguistic study of structures and functions, (Peter Peregrinus; London) 1975.

Hutchins W J, On the problem of “aboutness” in document analysis, Journal of Informatics, 1 (1977) 17-35. 6 Hutchins W J, The concept of “aboutness” in subject indexing, Aslib Proceedings, 30 (1978) 172-81.

Maron M E, On indexing, retrieval and the meaning of about, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28 (1977) 38-43.

Miksa F, The subject in the dictionary catalog from Cutter to the present, (American Library Association; Chicago) 1983.

Soergel D, Organizing information: principles of data base and retrieval systems, (Academic Press; Orlando) 1985.

Molina M P, Interdisciplinary approaches to the concept and practice of written text documentary content analysis, Journal of Documentation, 50 (2) (1994) 111-33.

Hjørland B, Information seeking and subject representation, an activity-theoretical approach to information science, (Greenwood Press; London) 1997.

Hjørland B, Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content and relevance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (9) (2001) 774–78.

Hjørland B, Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in Information Science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (4) (2002) 257-70.

Fairthorne R A, Content analysis, specification and control, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4 (1969) 73-109.

Metcalfe J, When is a subject not a subject? IN: Towards a theory of librarianship, Ed. by Conrad H Rawski, (Scarecrow Press; New York) 1973.

Frohmann B, The social construction of knowledge organization: the case of Melvil Dewey, Advances in Knowledge Organization, 4 (1994) 109-17.

Stam R, Film theory: an introduction, (Blackwell; Oxford) 2000.

Hjørland B Nicolaisen J, Bradford’s law of scattering: ambiguities in the concept of "subject". IN: Crestani, F. & Ruthven, I. (Eds.): CoLIS 2005, LNCS 3507, pp. 96–106. (Springer-Verlag; Berlin) 2005.

Ranganathan S R, Prolegomena to library Classification, (Asia Publishing House; London) 1967.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS