Beyond indicators and measures. Understanding the user's reality through a qualitative approach

González-Teruel , Aurora . Beyond indicators and measures. Understanding the user's reality through a qualitative approach., 2016 In: The identity of the contemporary public library. Principles and methods of analysis, evaluation, interpretation. Ledizioni LediPublishing, pp. 75-95. [Book chapter]

[thumbnail of González-Teruel_2016_Beyond_indicators_and_measures._Understanding_the_user’s_reality_through_a_qualitative_approach-1.pdf] Text
González-Teruel_2016_Beyond_indicators_and_measures._Understanding_the_user’s_reality_through_a_qualitative_approach-1.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (762kB)

English abstract

The present work considers the necessity of chang¬ing the perspective from that which we professionals observe users and from where we make decisions, decisions in which users are absolutely involved. We can no longer think only about “adapting users’ requirements” in terms of products and services, but must increasingly think about “blending into the user’s reality”. In other words, thinking about in what way it is possible to integrate the li¬brary into the user’s reality. From the methodological viewpoint, this involves putting in second place measures of transactions between users and the library through library statistics, and focusing our interest in knowing users and their social setting. It is a matter of seeking in-depth knowledge about potential users rather than representative results. Not being limited to only evaluate the library with standard surveys about satisfaction, but finding out what is beyond the good or bad evaluations that users give, and acting accordingly.

Item type: Book chapter
Keywords: Information behavior, information practice, Content analysis, Social network analysis, Discourse analysis
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
B. Information use and sociology of information
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
Depositing user: Aurora Gonzalez-Teruel
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2016 07:27
Last modified: 05 Jul 2016 07:27
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29573

References

Boeije, H. B. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.

Carey, R. F., McKechnie, L. E., & McKenzie, P. J. (2002). Gaining access to everyday life information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, 23(4), 319–334.

Chatman, E. A. (1992). The information world of retired women. New York: Greenwood Press.

Courtright, C. (2008). Context in information behavior research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 273–306. http://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410113

Davenport, E. (2010). Confessional methods and everyday life information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 533–562. http://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440119

Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of Sense-Making research: concepts, methods, and results to date. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://communication.sbs.ohio-state.edu/sense-making/art/artdervin83.html

Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3–33.

Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171–212.

Ellis, D. (2011). The emergence of conceptual modelling in information behaviour research. In A. Spink & J. Heinström (Eds.), New Directions in Information Behaviour (Vol. 1, pp. 17–35). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2011)002011a005

Fisher, K, Erdelez, S. & Mckechnie, L. (2005). Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

Gill, R. (1996). Discourse analysis: practical implementation. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 141–156). Leicester: British Psychological Society.

Given, L. M., Hicks, D., Schindel, T. J., & Willson, R. (2015). The informing nature of talk & text: Discourse analysis as a research approach in information science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–4. http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101002

González Fernández-Villavicencio, N., & González-Martín, A. (2013). Demostrar el valor de la biblioteca en la web social: Social Media Marketing (pp. 31–43). Presented at the Fesabid. XIII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación., Toledo.

González-Teruel, A. (2011). La perspectiva del usuario y del sistema en la investigación sobre el comportamiento informacional. Teoría De La Educación. Educación Y Cultura en La Sociedad De La Información, 12(1), 9–27.

González-Teruel, A., & Abad García, M.-F. (2012). Grounded theory for generating theory in the study of information behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 34(1), 31–36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.006

González-Teruel, A., & Andreu-Ramos, C. (2013). InvestIgacIón del comportamIento InformacIonal a través del análIsIs de redes socIales. El Profesional De La Información, 22(6), 522–528. http://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2013.nov.04

González-Teruel, A., & Barrios Cerrejón, M. (2012). Métodos y técnicas para la investigación del comportamiento informacional: fundamentos y nuevos desarrollos. Gijón: Ediciones Trea.

González-Teruel, A., González-Alcaide, G., Barrios Cerrejón, M., & Abad García, M.-F. (2015). Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks. Scientometrics, 103(2), 687–705. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1548-z

Gorman, G. E., Clayton, P., Shep, S. J., & Clayton, A. (2005). Qualitative research for the information professional : a practical handbook. London: Facet.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. http://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Green, R. (1991). The profession's models of information: a cognitive linguistic analysis. Journal of Documentation, 47(2), 130–140.

Haas, S. W., & Grams, E. S. (2000). Readers, authors, and page structure: A discussion of four questions arising from a content analysis of web pages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(2), 181–192. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<181::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-8

Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18(4), 323–342. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1

Hernández Sánchez, H., & Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2009). Estudio sobre los hábitos de lectura en la ciudad de Córdoba. Boletín De La Asociación Andaluza De Bibliotecarios, 96-97, 67–83.

Ho, J., & Crowley, G. H. (2003). User Perceptions of the “Reliability” of Library Services at Texas A&M University: A Focus Group Study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(2), 82–87.

Johnson, C. A. (2004). Choosing people: the role of social capital in information seeking behaviour. Information Research, 10(1), 10–11.

Johnson, C. A. (2007). Social capital and the search for information: examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 883–894. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20561

Julien, H. (1999). Constructing “users” in library and information science. Aslib Proceedings, 51(6), 206–209.

Julien, H., Pecoskie, J., & Reed, K. (2011). Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: a content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 33(1), 19–24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.014

Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking Meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood; NJ: Ablex.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis. An introduction. In P. Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Marouf, L. N. (2007). Social networks and knowledge sharing in organizations: a case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 110–125. http://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710832208

McKechnie, L. E., Baker, L., Greenwood, M., & Julien, H. (2002). Research method trends in human information literature. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 113–125.

McKenzie, P. J. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19–40. http://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310457993

Menzel, H. (1966). Information Needs and Uses ln Science and Technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1–28.

Olsson, M. R. (2006). Beyond “needy” individuals: conceptualizing information behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 43–55. http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450420161

Olsson, M. R. (2009). Re-thinking our concept of users. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(1), 22–35.

Olsson, M. R. (2012). Ciphers to this great accompt. The Shakespearian Social Sense-Making of theatre professionals. In G. Widen & K. Holmberg (Eds.), Social information research (Vol. 5, pp. 17–42). Bingley: Emerald. http://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2012)0000005004

Pettigrew, K. E. (1999). Waiting for chiropody: contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behaviour among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 801–817. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00027-8

Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 43–78.

Piñuel Raigada, J. L. (2002). Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido. Estudios De Sociolingüística, 30(1), 1–42.

Potter, J. (1998). La representación de la realidad. Discurso, retórica y construcción social (pp. 1–159). Barcelona: Paidos.

Radford, M. L. (1998). Approach or avoidance? The role of nonverbal communication in the academic library user's decision to initiate a reference encounter. Library Trends, 46(4), 699–717.

Radford, M. L. (2011). Foreword. In D. Cook & L. Farmer (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in action research: how librarians can get to the why of data (pp. XI–XII). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

Sairanen, A., & Savolainen, R. (2010). Avoiding health information in the context of uncertainty management. Information Research, 15(4), 8.

Savolainen, R. (2004). Enthusiastic, realistic and critical: discourses of Internet use in the context of everyday life information seeking. Information Research, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper198.html

Siatri, R. (1999). The evolution of user studies. Libri, 49(3), 132–141.

Tabak, E. (2014). Jumping between context and users: A difficulty in tracing information practices. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2223–2232. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23116

Talja, S. (1997). Constituting information and user as research objects: a theory of knowledge formations as alternative to the information man-theory. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts (pp. 61–80). London: Taylor Graham.

Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data: The discourse analytic method. Library & Information Science Research, 21(4), 459–477.

Talja, S. (2001). Music, Culture, and the Library: An Analysis of Discourses. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005). “Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 79–101. http://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578023

Tuominen, K. (1997). User-centered discourse: an analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly, 67(4), 350–371.

Wildemuth, B. M., & Perryman, C. L. (2009). Discourse analysis. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 320–328). London: Libraries Unlimited.

Willig, C. (2014). Discourses and discourse analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative analysis (pp. 341–353). London: Sage..

Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3–15.

Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249–270.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS