Informing Evidence Based Decisions: Usage Statistics for Online Journal Databases

Botchkarev, Alexei Informing Evidence Based Decisions: Usage Statistics for Online Journal Databases., 2016 [Preprint]

[img] Text
JAC - Usage Stats 0.4 e-lis (2016-07-07).pdf
Download (1MB)

English abstract

Objectives - The primary objective was to examine the 2009-2013 usage statistics of the Journal Access Centre (JAC) that is housed and powered by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care (MOHLTC) in the context of the evidence based decision making. In addition, the study highlights implementation of JAC and assesses availability and usage of high-quality research evidence to inform health systems’ policy making. Design - Prospective case study. Setting – A Canadian provincial ministry of health. Methods - Descriptive analysis of the JAC usage statistics of journal articles from January 2009 to September 2013. Main Results - MOHLTC’s broad area of responsibilities with dynamically changing priorities translates into diverse information needs of its employees: a total of 4,759 journal titles were accessed including 1,675 journals with full-text. Usage statistics indicates that MOHLTC information needs cannot be mapped to a reasonably compact set of “core” journals with a subsequent subscription to those. Conclusion - JAC usage statistics for 2011 – 2012 calendar years provide evidence of high demand (sessions, searches) for the journals included in the JAC databases and intensive consumption of its content creating a significant value (full-text articles) for the MOHLTC staff. JAC usage statistics for the period 2009-2013 demonstrate availability and usage of high-quality research to inform health systems’ decision making. The current paper contributes to the understanding of the information needs and patterns of use of online academic journals within the framework of health system evidence based policy making.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: evidence based decision making; health care; information science; library science; knowledge transfer; research evidence; online journals; journal databases; usage statistics
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Alexei Botchkarev
Date deposited: 11 Jul 2016 16:27
Last modified: 11 Jul 2016 16:27
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/29636

References

Arend, J. V. (2014). Bridging the research/policy gap: Policy officials' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to effective links between academic and policy worlds. Policy Studies, 35(6), 611-630. doi:10.1080/01442872.2014.971731

Botchkarev, A. (2013). Mining Evidence in the Online Academic Journal Databases: Access and Performance in Public Sector. E-prints in Library and Information Science (E-LIS), http://eprints.rclis.org/19286

Brownson, R. C., Reis, R. S., Allen, P., Duggan, K., Fields, R., Stamatakis, K. A., & Erwin, P. C. (2014). Understanding Administrative Evidence-Based Practices. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.013

Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources. COUNTER-2008 (n.d.). Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://www.projectcounter.org

EBSCO Information Services. (n.d.). Retrieved July 05, 2016, from https://www.ebsco.com

EBSCOhost website. (n.d.). Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://eadmin.ebscohost.com/EAdmin/Reports/SelectReportsForm.aspx

Field, P., Gauld, R., & Lawrence, M. (2012). Evidence-informed health policy - the crucial role of advocacy. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 66(4), 337-341. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02883.x

Gale Cengage Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://www.gale.cengage.com

Humphries, S., Stafinski, T., Mumtaz, Z., & Menon, D. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 171. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-171

Lomas, J., & Brown, A. D. (2009). Research and Advice Giving: A Functional View of Evidence-Informed Policy Advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health. Milbank Quarterly, 87(4), 903-926. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00583.

Madhavji, A., Araujo, E. A., Kim, K. B., & Buschang, P. H. (2011). Attitudes, awareness, and barriers toward evidence-based practice in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140(3), 309-316. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.023

O'connor, S., & Pettigrew, C. (2009). The barriers perceived to prevent the successful implementation of evidence-based practice by speech and language therapists. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(6), 1018-1035. doi:10.3109/13682820802585967

Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 2. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

Rapp, C. A., Etzel-Wise, D., Marty, D., Coffman, M., Carlson, L., Asher, D., Callaghan J., & Holter, M. (2010). Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice Implementation: Results of a Qualitative Study. Community Mental Health Journal, 46(2), 112-118. doi:10.1007/s10597-009-9238-z

Solomons, N. M., & Spross, J. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 109-120. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x

Sosnowy, C. D., Weiss, L. J., Maylahn, C. M., Pirani, S. J., & Katagiri, N. J. (2013). Factors Affecting Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Health Departments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(6), 763-768. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.004

Ubbink, D. T., Guyatt, G. H., & Vermeulen, H. (2013). Framework of policy recommendations for implementation of evidence-based practice: A systematic scoping review. BMJ Open, 3(1). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001881

Ubbink, D. T., Vermeulen, H., Knops, A. M., Legemate, D. A., Oude Rengerink, K., Heineman, M. J., Roos Y.B., Fijnvandraat C.J., Heymans H.S., Simons R., & Levi, M. (2011). Implementation of evidence-based practice: outside the box, throughout the hospital. Neth J Med, 69(2), 87-94.

Wallace, J., Nwosu, B., & Clarke, M. (2012). Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions. BMJ Open, 2(5). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220

Wooding, S., Hanney, S. R., Pollitt, A., Grant, J., & Buxton, M. J. (2014). Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: A multinational case study approach. Implementation Science, 9(1), 47. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-47


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS