Corrigendum to “Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters” [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]

Rahman, A I M-Jakaria, Guns, Raf, Rousseau, Ronald and Engels, Tim C. E. Corrigendum to “Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters” [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]., 2016 [Preprint]

Text Corrigendum to Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent.pdf - Accepted version Download (54kB)

English abstract

In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we called barycenters in N dimensions. This note corrects this terminology and introduces the more adequate term ‘similarity-adapted publication vectors’.

Item type:	Preprint
Keywords:	Research evaluation; Expert panel; Barycenter; Overlay map; Matching research expertise; Similarity matrix.
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user:	A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman
Date deposited:	07 Oct 2016 13:01
Last modified:	07 Oct 2016 13:01
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30025

References

Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.

Rahman, A.I.M.J., Guns, R., Rousseau, R., & Engels, T.C.E. (2015). Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 704–721.

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item