On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment

Slavic, Aida On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment. El profesional de la información, 2007, vol. 16, n. 6, pp. 580-589. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Journal article (Print/Paginated)] Text (Journal article (Print/Paginated))
05.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (323kB)

English abstract

Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.

Spanish abstract

Los estándares para publicar e intercambiar vocabularios enfocados en la Red, así como las propuestas para servicios y registros de terminología, pueden mejorar el intercambio y uso de todos los sistemas para organizar conocimientos en red. Esto significa que las clasificaciones documentales también pueden resultar más útiles fuera de su aplicación original. En este trabajo se resumen unas características típicas de clasificaciones documentales y se explican aspectos de terminología, función y realización. El concepto original de cada esquema de clasificación determina las funciones para las que el vocabulario está diseñado. Estas funciones influyen sobre la estructura, semántica y sintáctica, así como la cobertura de esquemas y formato en el cual los datos de clasificación se publican y se hacen accesibles. El autor sugiere que hay que prestar atención a las diferencias entre clasificaciones documentales porque pueden determinar su encaje para un fin específico y pueden imponer requisitos distintos a su uso online. Cuando hablamos creamos muchas clasificaciones para organizar conocimientos y puede ser importante promocionar una mayor pericia del dominio bibliográfico respecto a la construcción y uso de sistemas de clasificación.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Esquemas de clasificación; Clasificación documental; Clasificación bibliotecaria; Tipología; Classification schemes; Documentary classifications; Library classifications; Typology.
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
L. Information technology and library technology
L. Information technology and library technology > LB. Computer networking.
Depositing user: María Sánchez-Moretón
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2016 08:54
Last modified: 07 Oct 2016 08:54
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30089

References

Aitchison, J. “The thesaurofacet: a multipurpose retrieval language tool”. En: Journal of documentation, 1970, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 187-203.

Beghtol, C. “General classification systems: structural principles for multidisciplinary specification”. En: Mustafa Elhadi, W.; Maniez, J.; Pollitt, S.(eds.).

Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proceedings of the Fifth International

ISKO Conference. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 1998, pp. 89-96.

Bhattacharyya, G. “Fundamentals of subject indexing languages”. En: Neelameghan, A. (ed.).

Ordering systems for global information networks: proceedings of the Third international study conference on classification research. Bangalore: DRTC: FID/CR and Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, 1979, pp. 83-99.

Bhattacharyya, G. “Classaurus: its fundamentals, design and use”. En: Dahlberg, I.(ed.).

Universal classification: subject analysis and ordering systems: proceeding of the 4th International study conference on classification research ,vol. 1. Frankfurt: Indeks Verlag, 1982, pp. 139-148.

Broughton, V.Essential classification . London: Facet Publishing, 2004.

Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.“Building a faceted classification for the humanities: principles and procedures”. En: Journal of documentation,2007,v. 63, n. 5, pp. 727-754.

http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1976/

BS 8723-1; BS 8723-2.Structured vocabularies for information retrieval. Part 1: definitions, symbols and abbreviation; Part 2: thesauri. London, British Standards Institution, 2005.

Concise Unimarc classification format (draft), 2001.

http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-1/concise.htm

Dahlberg, I. “The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view”. En: Williamson, N. J. ; Hudon, M.(eds.). Classification research for knowledge representation and organization: proceedings of the 5th International study conference on classification research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; The Hague: FID, 1992, pp. 187-209.

Desire information gateway handbook, 2000.

http://www.desire.org/handbook/2-5.html

Fosket, A. C. The subject approach to information. 5th ed. London: Library Association Publishing, 1997.

Fugmann, R.“Unused opportunities in indexing and classification”. En: Fugmann, R. (ed.).Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface: proceedings of the 1st International ISKO conference.Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag, 1990, pp. 65-77.

Gnoli, C.“Progress in synthetic classification: towards unique definition of concepts”. En: extensions & corrections to the UDC, 2007, n. 29 [in print].

http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1945/01/synthetic.pdf

Gödert, W. “Facet classification in online retrieval”. En: International classification, 1991, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 98-105.

Hodge, G. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries, 2000.

http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/contents.html

Isaac, A.; Slavic, A. UDC: the Universal Decimal Classification.

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/EucUDC

ISO 5963.Documentation-methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms: international standard. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 1985.

ISO/IEC 13250:2000 Topic maps: information technology-document description and markup languages. Biezunski, .; Bryan, M.(eds.). Newcomb. First, December 3 1999.

http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/document/0129.pdf

Koch, T.; Day, M. The role of classification schemes in internet resource description and discovery: Desire project report. Bath: Ukoln, 1997.

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/classification/ Marc 21 concise format for classification data. Update no. 7, 2006.

http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/

Markey, K. “Forty years of classification online: final chapter of future un limited?”. En: Mitchell, J. S.; Vizine-Goetz, D. Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System. Binghampton, NY: The Haworth Information Press, 2006, pp. 1-63.

Pika, J. “Universal Decimal Classification at the ETH-Bibliothek Zurich-a Swiss perspective”. En: Extensions & corrections to the UDC, 2007, n. 29 [in print].

Pollitt, S.; Tinker, A. J. “Enhanced view-based searching through the decomposition of Dewey Decimal Classification Codes”. En: Beghtol, C. ; Howarth, L. C.; Williamson, N. J.(eds.). Dynamism and stability of knowledge organization: proceedings of the Sixth International SKO conference . Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2000, 288-294.

Ranganathan, S. R. “Library classification on the march”. En: Foskett, D. J; Palmer, B. I.(eds.). The Sayers memorial volume: essays in librarianship in memory of William Charles Berwick Sayers. London: The Library Association, 1961, pp. 72-95.

Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M. I. “Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications”. En: McIlwaine, I.C.Knowledge organization and the global information society: proceedings of the 8th ISKO conference.Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2004, pp. 187-192.

Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M. I. “Sharing and re-use of classification systems: the need for a common data model”. En: Signum, 2004a, n. 8, pp. 19-24.

Svenonius, E. “Precoordination or not?”. En: Holley, Robert P., et al (eds.). Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90’. München: K. G. Saur, 1995, pp. 231-255.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item