Teachers’ Use of ICTs in Public Language Education: Evidence from Second Language Secondary-school Classrooms

Izquierdo, Jesús and de-la-Cruz-Villegas, Verónica and Aquino-Zúñiga, Silvia-Patricia and Sandoval-Caraveo, María-del-Carmen and García-Martínez, Verónica Teachers’ Use of ICTs in Public Language Education: Evidence from Second Language Secondary-school Classrooms. Comunicar, 2017, vol. 25, n. 50, pp. 33-41. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text (In English)
c5003en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (381kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (En español)
c5003es.pdf

Download (296kB) | Preview

English abstract

Worldwide, curricular changes and financial investments are currently underway to promote the integration of technology in public education and English language learning at a young age. This study examines the ICTs that have become part of the daily instructional practices and educational settings of teachers of English who work with young learners in public schools. To this end, this mixed-methods study draws on a quantitative descriptive-exploratory design and a qualitative multiple-case study. The quantitative data were collected through a Likert questionnaire administered to 28 secondary school teachers of English across 17 municipalities in five regions of Southeast Mexico and 2,944 learners. The qualitative data were gathered from a subsample of six teachers through longitudinal classroom observations, teacher and administrator interviews, and school visits. The non-parametric analyses of the quantitative data and the categorical aggregation analyses of the qualitative data reveal that the use of some multimedia and mobile-assisted communication resources is emerging in the L2 public classrooms. In line with findings from other international contexts, variables that seem particular to public education for young learners and their school setting, however, led teachers to prefer using their own technological devices that included laptops, multimedia material, and cellphones, rather than those in the schools.

Spanish abstract

La educación pública en diversos países está experimentando una serie de reformas que favorecen la integración de la tecnología en la educación pública y el aprendizaje del inglés a una temprana edad. El presente estudio mixto, examinó el empleo de la tecnología en las prácticas pedagógicas cotidianas de los profesores de inglés en la educación secundaria pública y los recursos tecnológicos de los que disponen normalmente en sus escuelas. Para la fase cuantitativa se empleó un diseño descriptivo-exploratorio, a través de un cuestionario tipo Likert aplicado a 28 profesores y 2.944 alumnos en 17 municipios del sureste mexicano. Para la cualitativa, se empleó un estudio de múltiples casos con un sub-grupo de seis profesores del cual se recolectó información a través de observaciones de clases, entrevistas con docentes y directivos, y visitas a las instalaciones de las escuelas. El empleo de análisis no-paramétrico con los datos cuantitativos y de agregación categórica con los datos cualitativos permitió identificar algunos recursos multimedia y de comunicación móvil que los profesores tienden a emplear de manera cotidiana en el aula. No obstante, diversos factores relacionados con aspectos propios de la educación pública y el contexto escolar influyeron para que los profesores prefirieran sus propios medios tecnológicos tales como ordenadores portátiles, teléfonos inteligentes y materiales multimedia a los disponibles en su institución.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Public education; technology; language learning; English teaching; secondary school education; multimedia resources; mobile assisted communication; Educación pública; tecnología; aprendizaje de lenguas; enseñanza del inglés; educación secundaria; recursos multimedia; comunicación móvil
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 10 Jan 2017 21:46
Last modified: 10 Jan 2017 21:46
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30596

References

Allen, L.K., Crossley, S.A., Snow, E.L., & McNamara, D.S. (2014). L2 Writing Practice: Game Enjoyment as a Key to Engagement. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 124-150. (http://goo.gl/j6BGnN) (2016-04-30).

Bax, S. (2003). Call: Past, Present and Future. System, 31, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4

Burston, J. (2015). Twenty Years of MALL Project Implementation: A Meta-analysis of Learning Outcomes. ReCALL, 27, 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159

Cerezo, L., Baralt, M., Suh, B., & Leow, P. (2014). Does the Medium Really Matter in L2 Development? The Validity of CALL Research Designs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839569

Chambers, A., & Bax, S. (2006). Making CALL Work: Towards Normalisation. System, 34(4), 465-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.08.001

Chapelle, C. (2002). Computer-assisted Language Learning. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 498-505). New York: Oxford University Press.

Compton, L. (2009). Preparing Language Teachers to Teach Language Online: A Look at Skills, Roles, and Responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831

Cresswell, J. (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-methods Approaches. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage.

Durán-Fernández, A., & Barrio-Barrio, J.F. (2007). Disposición y uso de recursos informáticos para la enseñanza-aprendizaje del inglés: Una descripción a partir de una muestra en cien centros públicos de Educación Infantil y Primaria de la Comunidad de Madrid. Porta Linguarum, 8, 193-223. (http://goo.gl/eHTyRD) (2016-04-30).

Edwards, V., Pemberton, L., Knight, J., & Monoghan, F. (2002). Fabula: A Bilingual Multimedia Authoring Environment for Children Exploring Minority Languages. Language Learning & Technology, 6(2), 59-69. (http://goo.gl/ZvBx9f) (2016-04-30).

Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.F. (2004). Mediating the Digital Divide in CALL Classrooms: Promoting Effective Language Tasks in Limited Technology Contexts. ReCALL,16, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004000321

Fabila, A., Minami, H., & Izquierdo, J. (2012). La escala de Likert en la evaluación docente. Acercamiento a sus características y principios metodológicos. Perspectivas Docentes, 50, 31-40. (http://goo.gl/BztbXh) (2016-04-30).

Felix, U. (2004). A Multivariate Analysis of Secondary Students’ Experience of Web-based Language Learning. ReCALL, 16, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004001715

Felix, U. (2005). Analysing Recent CALL Effectiveness Research - Towards a Common Agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500132274

Fields, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage.

Figura, K., & Jarvis, H. (2007). Computer-based Materials: A Study of Learner Autonomy and Strategies. System, 35, 448-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.07.001

Golonka, E., Bowles, A., Frank, V., Richardson, D., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for Foreign Language Learning: A Review of Technology Types and Their Effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315

Guénette, D., & Lyster, R. (2013). Written Corrective Feedback and its Challenges for Pre-service ESL Teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1346

Harker, M., & Koutsantoni, D. (2005). Can it be as Effective? Distance versus Blended Learning in a Web-based EAP Programme. ReCALL, 17, 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400500042X

He, B., Puakpong, N., & Lian, A. (2015). Factors Affecting the Normalization of CALL in Chinese Senior High Schools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.803981

Hulstijn, J.H. (2000). The Use of Computer Technology in Experimental Studies of Second Language Acquisition: A Survey of Some Techniques and Some ongoing Studies. Language Learning & Technology, 3, 32-43. (http://goo.gl/OOlYJM) (2016-04-30).

Izquierdo, J. (2014). Multimedia Instruction in Foreign Language Classrooms: Effects on the Acquisition of the French Perfective and Imperfective Distinction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 188-219. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1697

Izquierdo, J. García, V., Garza, G., & Aquino, S. (2016). First and Target Language Use in Public Language Education for Young Learners: Longitudinal Evidence from Mexican Secondary-school Classrooms. System, 61, 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.006

Izquierdo, J. Simard, D., & Garza, G. (2015). Multimedia Instruction & Language learning Attitudes: A Study with University-students. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 17(2), 101-115. (http://goo.gl/0UNNTf) (2016-04-30).

Izquierdo, J., Aquino, S., & al. (2014). Prácticas y competencias docentes de los profesores de inglés: Diagnóstico en secundarias públicas de Tabasco [Instructional Practices and Teaching Competencies of EFL Teachers: Evidence from Public Secondary Schools in Tabasco]. Sinéctica, 42, 1-25. (https://goo.gl/nrYmy6) (2016-04-30).

Jeon-Ellis, G., Debski, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Oral Interaction around Computers, in the Project-oriented CALL Classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 121-145. (http://goo.gl/G1q6Hc) (2016-04-30).

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium (http://goo.gl/S8Io6x). (2016-04-30).

Lan, Y.J., Sung, Y.T., Cheng, C.C., & Chang, K.E. (2015). Computer-supported Cooperative Prewriting for enhancing Young EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134-155. (http://goo.gl/efq31H) (2016-04-30).

Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2006). BLINGUA. A Blended Language Learning Approach for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220601043016

Lin, H. (2015). A Meta-synthesis of Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Computer-mediated Communication (CMC) in SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 85-117. (http://goo.gl/ezQcCx) (2016-04-30).

Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2011). A Systematic Review of CALL in English as a Second Language: Focus on Primary and Secondary Education. (State-of-the-Art Article). Language Teaching, 45(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000395

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second Language Research. Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Plass, J., & Jones, L. (2005). Multimedia Learning in Second Language Acquisition. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia (pp. 467-488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Raby, F. (2007). A Triangular Approach to motivation in Computer Assisted Autonomous Language Learning (CAALL). ReCALL, 19, 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000626

Sagarra, N., & Zapata, G. (2008). Blending Classroom Instruction with Online Homework: A Study of Student Perceptions of Computer-assisted L2 Learning. ReCALL, 20, 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000621

Schwienhorst, K. (2002). The State of VR: A Meta-Analysis of Virtual Reality Tools in Second Language Acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.3.221.8186

Taylor, R.P., & Gitsaki C. (2003). Teaching WELL in a Computerless Classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.4.275.23412

Thouin, M. (2014). Réaliser une recherche en didactique. Montreal: Multimondes.

World Bank (2007). Ampliar oportunidades y construir competencias para los jóvenes. Una agenda para la educación secundaria. Bogotá: Banco Mundial y Mayol Ediciones.

Yun, J. (2011). The Effects of Hypertext Glosses on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: A Meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1) 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.523285


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item