O todo é maior do que a soma das partes: estado da arte sobre indexação por assuntos na criação de catálogos coletivos

Abadal Falgueras, E. (2004). Gestión de proyectos en información y documentación. Gijón: Trea, 2004.

Barité, M. (2014). Control de vocabulario: orígenes, evolución y proyección. // Ciência da Informação. 43:1 (2014) 95-119.

Bates, M. J. (1986). Subject access in online catalogs: a design mod-el. // Journal of The American Society for Information Science. 37:6 (1986) 357-376.

Boberić-Krstićev, D., & Tešendić, D. (2015). Mixed approach in creating a university union catalogue. // The Electronic Library. 33:6 (2015) 970-989.

Boccato, V. R. C., & Torquetti, M. C. (2012). Interoperabilidade entre linguagens de indexação como recurso de construção de instrumento de representação temática de clippings de coordenadorias de comunicação social em ambientes universitários: uma proposta metodológica. // Informação & Informação. 17:3 (2012) 76-101.

Borgman, C. L. (1997). From acting locally to thinking globally: a brief history of library automation. // The Library Quarterly. 67:3 (1997) 215–249.

Brummel, L. (1958). Union catalogues: problems of international co-operation. // Symposium on National Libraries in Europe. Paris: Unesco, 1958.

Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its inte-gration with other discovery tools: final report prepared for Li-brary of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf (2015-12-20).

Caro Castro, C. (2005). El acceso por materias en los catálogos en línea: índices y terminología de los usuarios en el catálogo Cisne (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2005.

Connell, T. H. (1991). Techniques to improve subject retrieval in online catalogs: flexible access to elements in the bibliographic record. // Information Technology and Libraries. 10:2 (1991) 87-98.

Cousins, S. (1998). Duplicate detection and record consolidation in large bibliographic databases: the COPAC database experience. // Journal of Information Science. 24:4 (1998) 231-240.

Cousins, S. (1999). Virtual OPACs versus union database: two mod-els of union catalogue provision. // The Electronic Library. 17:2 (1999) 97 – 103.

Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR, before and after: a look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: ALA, 2016.

Dovey, M. (2000). So You Want to Build a Union Catalogue? // Ariadne. 23, 2000.

Gross, T. & Taylor, A. G. (2005). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. // College & Research Libraries. 66:3 (2005) 212-230.

Gross, T., Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2015). Still a lot to lose: the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching. // Cata-loging & Classification Quarterly. 53:1 (2015) 1-39.

Han, M. J. (2012). New discovery services and library bibliographic control. // Library Trends. 61:1 (2012) 162-172.

Harken, S. E. et al. (2006). Subject semantic interoperability: final report. Report of the Subcommittee on Semantic Interoperability to the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.108.7413&rep=rep1&type=pdf (2015-12-20).

Heron, S. J., Simpson, B., Weiss, A. K., & Phillips, J. (2013). Merg-ing catalogs: creating a shared bibliographic environment for the State University Libraries of Florida. // Cataloging & Classifica-tion Quarterly. 51:1-3 (2013) 139-155.

IFLA (2010). Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): a Conceptual Model. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf (2015-12-20).

Keller, C. D. (1974). Union catalogs and lists: aspects of national and California coverage. // Occasional papers (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Graduate School of Library Science). 114 (1974).

Kilgour, F. G. (1970). History of library computerization. // Journal of Library Automation. 3:3 (1970) 218-229.

Kilgour, F. G., Long, P. L., Landgraf, A. L., & Wyckoff, J. A. (1972). The shared cataloging system of the Ohio College Li-brary Center. // Journal of Library Automation. 5:3 (1972) 157-183.

Kohl, D. F. (1997). Resource sharing in a changing Ohio environ-ment. // Library Trends. 45:3 (1997) 435-447.

Koltay, K. (2004). Subject cataloging in a cooperative cataloging environment: a case study. // Lass, A.; Quandt, R. E. (Eds.). Un-ion catalogs at the crossroad. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2004. 305-325.

Kuncaitis, Y. (1968). Union catalogs and bibliographic centers: a state-of-the-art review. Columbus: The State Library of Ohio, 1968.

Lancaster, F. W., Connell, T. H., Bishop, N., & McCowan, S. (1991). Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs. // Library Resources and Technical Services. 35:4 (1991) 377-391.

Lancaster, F. W. (2002). El control del vocabulario en la recupera-ción de información. 2ª ed. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia, 2002.

Landry, P. (2004). Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS. // Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 37:3-4 (2004) 177-191.

Lass, A. & Quandt, R. E. (Eds.). (2004). Union catalogs at the cross-road. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2004.

Lazarinis, F. (2015). Cataloguing and classification: an introduction to AACR2, RDA, DDC, LCC, LCSH and MARC 21 standards. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing, 2015.

Lemos, L. & Macedo, M. C. (2003). A Cooperação entre as Bibliotecas do Ensino Superior em Portugal: passado, presente e perspectiva futura. // 9ª Jornadas Porbase. Lisboa, 2003.

Lynch, C. A. (1997). Building the infrastructure of resource sharing: union catalogs, distributed search, and cross-database linkage. // Library trends. 45:3 (1997) 448-461.

Martins, M. C. B. (2014). Indexação e controlo da terminologia em bibliotecas do ensino superior politécnico em Portugal: o sistema no Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre. Salamanca: Ed. Universidad de Salamanca, 2014. Tese de Doutoramento.

Mendes, M. T. P., & Simões, M. G. (2002). Indexação por assuntos: princípios gerais e normas. Lisboa: Gabinete de Estudos a&b, 2002.

OCLC (2015). OCLC prints last library catalog cards. https://www.oclc.org/news/releases/2015/201529dublin.en.html (2015-12-20).

Olson, H. A., & Boll, J. J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 2001.

Rebiun (2014). Manual de procedimiento para la inclusión de regis-tros en el catálogo colectivo de REBIUN y para el uso de Z-39.50. http://www.rebiun.org/documentos/Documents/GTCATALOGO/Manualdeprocedimiento_CatalogoColectivo_enero2014.pdf (2015-12-20).

Reitz, J. M. (2013). Union catalog. // ODLIS: Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_about.aspx (2015-12-20).

Smith, I. A. (2003). Union catalogues. // Feather, J.; Surges, P. (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2003. 643.

State University Libraries of Florida (2010). Guidelines and proce-dures for the shared bibliographic catalog. http://csul.net/sites/csul.fcla.edu/uploads/SULGuidelinesandProceduresforSharedBibCatalog.pdf (2015-12-20).

Wiley, L. (2011). Access-Related Reference Services. // Bopp, R. E.; Smith, L. C. (Eds.). Reference and information services: an in-troduction. 4th ed. ABC-CLIO, 2011.

Wright, A. (2014). Cataloging the world: Paul Otlet and the birth of the information age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Zeng, M. L. & Chan, L. M. (2004). Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. // Jour-nal of the American Society for information science and tech-nology. 55:5 (2004) 377-395.