O todo é maior do que a soma das partes: estado da arte sobre indexação por assuntos na criação de catálogos coletivos

Revez, Jorge O todo é maior do que a soma das partes: estado da arte sobre indexação por assuntos na criação de catálogos coletivos. Brazilian Journal of Information Studies: Research Trends, 2017, vol. 11, n. 1, pp. 61-70. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 5850-21690-1-PB.pdf]
Preview
Text
5850-21690-1-PB.pdf

Download (466kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper investigates the problem of subject indexing at the creation of integrated union library catalogs, more precisely, what happens in an electronic merging process with the terms entered in the content description fields. It seeks to acknowledge the state-of-the-art concerning the solutions found in the context of the information organization systems to value the investment in the use of subject terms in local catalogs at the creation/merger of union catalogs. We conclude that, in the absence of a model that can be applied uniformly to all projects, different solutions should be the result of a collective planning effort to implement an adequate set of measures. It is proposed a recommendation to the networks that will promote the creation of integrated union catalogs in Portugal.

Portuguese abstract

Este trabalho investiga o problema da indexação por assuntos no momento da criação de catálogos bibliográficos coletivos centralizados, isto é, o que sucede, numa fusão eletrónica, com os termos inseridos nos campos de descrição dos conteúdos. Procura-se sistematizar neste estado da arte as soluções encontradas, no contexto dos sistemas de organização da informação, para rentabilizar o investimento na utilização de descritores de assunto em catálogos bibliográficos locais no momento da formação/fusão de catálogos coletivos. Conclui-se que, não existindo um modelo que se possa aplicar uniformemente a todos os projetos, as diferentes soluções devem resultar de um esforço de planeamento coletivo que implemente um conjunto adequado de medidas. É proposta uma recomendação para as redes que irão promover a criação de catálogos coletivos centralizados em Portugal.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Subject indexing; Union catalogs; Vocabulary control; Library catalogs; OPAC; Information organization systems
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
Depositing user: Jorge Revez
Date deposited: 16 Feb 2017 22:15
Last modified: 16 Feb 2017 22:15
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30887

References

Abadal Falgueras, E. (2004). Gestión de proyectos en información y documentación. Gijón: Trea, 2004.

Barité, M. (2014). Control de vocabulario: orígenes, evolución y proyección. // Ciência da Informação. 43:1 (2014) 95-119.

Bates, M. J. (1986). Subject access in online catalogs: a design mod-el. // Journal of The American Society for Information Science. 37:6 (1986) 357-376.

Boberić-Krstićev, D., & Tešendić, D. (2015). Mixed approach in creating a university union catalogue. // The Electronic Library. 33:6 (2015) 970-989.

Boccato, V. R. C., & Torquetti, M. C. (2012). Interoperabilidade entre linguagens de indexação como recurso de construção de instrumento de representação temática de clippings de coordenadorias de comunicação social em ambientes universitários: uma proposta metodológica. // Informação & Informação. 17:3 (2012) 76-101.

Borgman, C. L. (1997). From acting locally to thinking globally: a brief history of library automation. // The Library Quarterly. 67:3 (1997) 215–249.

Brummel, L. (1958). Union catalogues: problems of international co-operation. // Symposium on National Libraries in Europe. Paris: Unesco, 1958.

Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its inte-gration with other discovery tools: final report prepared for Li-brary of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf (2015-12-20).

Caro Castro, C. (2005). El acceso por materias en los catálogos en línea: índices y terminología de los usuarios en el catálogo Cisne (Universidad Complutense de Madrid). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 2005.

Connell, T. H. (1991). Techniques to improve subject retrieval in online catalogs: flexible access to elements in the bibliographic record. // Information Technology and Libraries. 10:2 (1991) 87-98.

Cousins, S. (1998). Duplicate detection and record consolidation in large bibliographic databases: the COPAC database experience. // Journal of Information Science. 24:4 (1998) 231-240.

Cousins, S. (1999). Virtual OPACs versus union database: two mod-els of union catalogue provision. // The Electronic Library. 17:2 (1999) 97 – 103.

Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR, before and after: a look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: ALA, 2016.

Dovey, M. (2000). So You Want to Build a Union Catalogue? // Ariadne. 23, 2000.

Gross, T. & Taylor, A. G. (2005). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. // College & Research Libraries. 66:3 (2005) 212-230.

Gross, T., Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2015). Still a lot to lose: the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching. // Cata-loging & Classification Quarterly. 53:1 (2015) 1-39.

Han, M. J. (2012). New discovery services and library bibliographic control. // Library Trends. 61:1 (2012) 162-172.

Harken, S. E. et al. (2006). Subject semantic interoperability: final report. Report of the Subcommittee on Semantic Interoperability to the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.108.7413&rep=rep1&type=pdf (2015-12-20).

Heron, S. J., Simpson, B., Weiss, A. K., & Phillips, J. (2013). Merg-ing catalogs: creating a shared bibliographic environment for the State University Libraries of Florida. // Cataloging & Classifica-tion Quarterly. 51:1-3 (2013) 139-155.

IFLA (2010). Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): a Conceptual Model. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf (2015-12-20).

Keller, C. D. (1974). Union catalogs and lists: aspects of national and California coverage. // Occasional papers (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Graduate School of Library Science). 114 (1974).

Kilgour, F. G. (1970). History of library computerization. // Journal of Library Automation. 3:3 (1970) 218-229.

Kilgour, F. G., Long, P. L., Landgraf, A. L., & Wyckoff, J. A. (1972). The shared cataloging system of the Ohio College Li-brary Center. // Journal of Library Automation. 5:3 (1972) 157-183.

Kohl, D. F. (1997). Resource sharing in a changing Ohio environ-ment. // Library Trends. 45:3 (1997) 435-447.

Koltay, K. (2004). Subject cataloging in a cooperative cataloging environment: a case study. // Lass, A.; Quandt, R. E. (Eds.). Un-ion catalogs at the crossroad. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2004. 305-325.

Kuncaitis, Y. (1968). Union catalogs and bibliographic centers: a state-of-the-art review. Columbus: The State Library of Ohio, 1968.

Lancaster, F. W., Connell, T. H., Bishop, N., & McCowan, S. (1991). Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs. // Library Resources and Technical Services. 35:4 (1991) 377-391.

Lancaster, F. W. (2002). El control del vocabulario en la recupera-ción de información. 2ª ed. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia, 2002.

Landry, P. (2004). Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS. // Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 37:3-4 (2004) 177-191.

Lass, A. & Quandt, R. E. (Eds.). (2004). Union catalogs at the cross-road. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press, 2004.

Lazarinis, F. (2015). Cataloguing and classification: an introduction to AACR2, RDA, DDC, LCC, LCSH and MARC 21 standards. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing, 2015.

Lemos, L. & Macedo, M. C. (2003). A Cooperação entre as Bibliotecas do Ensino Superior em Portugal: passado, presente e perspectiva futura. // 9ª Jornadas Porbase. Lisboa, 2003.

Lynch, C. A. (1997). Building the infrastructure of resource sharing: union catalogs, distributed search, and cross-database linkage. // Library trends. 45:3 (1997) 448-461.

Martins, M. C. B. (2014). Indexação e controlo da terminologia em bibliotecas do ensino superior politécnico em Portugal: o sistema no Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre. Salamanca: Ed. Universidad de Salamanca, 2014. Tese de Doutoramento.

Mendes, M. T. P., & Simões, M. G. (2002). Indexação por assuntos: princípios gerais e normas. Lisboa: Gabinete de Estudos a&b, 2002.

OCLC (2015). OCLC prints last library catalog cards. https://www.oclc.org/news/releases/2015/201529dublin.en.html (2015-12-20).

Olson, H. A., & Boll, J. J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, 2001.

Rebiun (2014). Manual de procedimiento para la inclusión de regis-tros en el catálogo colectivo de REBIUN y para el uso de Z-39.50. http://www.rebiun.org/documentos/Documents/GTCATALOGO/Manualdeprocedimiento_CatalogoColectivo_enero2014.pdf (2015-12-20).

Reitz, J. M. (2013). Union catalog. // ODLIS: Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science. http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_about.aspx (2015-12-20).

Smith, I. A. (2003). Union catalogues. // Feather, J.; Surges, P. (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2003. 643.

State University Libraries of Florida (2010). Guidelines and proce-dures for the shared bibliographic catalog. http://csul.net/sites/csul.fcla.edu/uploads/SULGuidelinesandProceduresforSharedBibCatalog.pdf (2015-12-20).

Wiley, L. (2011). Access-Related Reference Services. // Bopp, R. E.; Smith, L. C. (Eds.). Reference and information services: an in-troduction. 4th ed. ABC-CLIO, 2011.

Wright, A. (2014). Cataloging the world: Paul Otlet and the birth of the information age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Zeng, M. L. & Chan, L. M. (2004). Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. // Jour-nal of the American Society for information science and tech-nology. 55:5 (2004) 377-395.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item