Access, ethics and piracy

Lawson, Stuart Access, ethics and piracy. Insights, 2017, vol. 30, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
VOR Lawson 2017 - Access ethics piracy.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (187kB) | Preview

English abstract

Ownership of intellectual property rights for a large proportion of the scholarly record is held by publishers, so a majority of journal articles are behind paywalls and unavailable to most people. As a result some readers are encouraged to use pirate websites such as Sci-Hub to access them, a practice that is alternately regarded as criminal and unethical or as a justified act of civil disobedience. This article considers both the efficacy and ethics of piracy, placing ‘guerrilla open access’ within a longer history of piracy and access to knowledge. By doing so, it is shown that piracy is an inevitable part of the intellectual landscape that can render the current intellectual property regime irrelevant. If we wish to actively construct a true scholarly commons, open access emerges as a contender for moving beyond proprietary forms of commodifying scholarly knowledge towards the creation of an open scholarly communication system that is fit for purpose.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: piracy, copyright, open access
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
Depositing user: Stuart Lawson
Date deposited: 28 Mar 2017 12:31
Last modified: 28 Mar 2017 12:31
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30975

References

Association of American Publishers (2016). AAP Overview on Sci-Hub and Scholarly Publishing. August 5 2016 AAP blog: http://newsroom.publishers.org/aap-overview-on-sci-hub-and-scholarly-publishing/ (accessed 19 December 2016).

Lowe, D (2016). Thoughts on Sci-Hub. February 16 2016 In the Pipeline blog: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2016/02/16/thoughts-on-sci-hub (accessed 19 December 2016).

Brembs, B (2016). Sci-Hub as necessary, effective civil disobedience. February 25 2016 bjoern@brembs@net blog: http://bjoern.brembs.net/2016/02/sci-hub-as-necessary-effective-civil-disobedience/ (accessed 19 December 2016).

Johns, A (2009). Piracy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, p. 7.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226401201.001.0001

Taylor & Francis. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/authors/copyrightinc.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).

Archambault et al. (2014). Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996–2013, : ii. http://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf (accessed 10 January 2017).

Yar, M (2005). The global ‘epidemic’ of movie ‘piracy’: crime-wave or social construction?. Media, Culture & Society 27(5): 687–688, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443705055723 (accessed 19 December 2016).

Bodó, B (2011). Coda: A Short History of Book Piracy In: Karaganis, J ed. Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. New York: Social Science Research Council, pp. 399–413.

Cabanac, G (2016). Bibliogifts in LibGen? A study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(4): 874–884, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23445 (accessed 19 December 2016. Postprint available at: ftp://ftp.irit.fr/IRIT/SIG/2015_JASIST_C.pdf).

Bohannon, J (2016). The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub. Science 352(6285): 511.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.511 (accessed 19 December 2016). Also available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/alexandra-elbakyan-founded-sci-hub-thwart-journal-paywalls.

Bohannon, J (2016). Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone. Science 352(6285): 508–512, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.508 (accessed 19 December 2016. Also available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone).

Bodó, B (2014). In the Shadow of the Gigapedia In: Karaganis, J ed. Shadow Libraries. New York: American Assembly.

Machin-Mastromatteo, J D, Uribe-Tirado, A and Romero-Ortiz, M E (2016). Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data. Information Development 32(5)DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266666916671080 (accessed 19 December 2016).

Research4Life (2016). Eligibility for Access to Research4Life, http://www.research4life.org/eligibility/ (accessed 19 December 2016).

Karaganis, J ed. (2011). Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. New York: Social Science Research Council, p. 2.

Gardner, T J and Anderson, T M (2014). Criminal Law. 12th edition Stamford: Cengage Learning, pp. 358–384.

United States District Court Southern District of New York. Elsevier vs Sci-Hub: https://torrentfreak.com/images/elsevier-complaint.pdf (accessed 19 December 2016).

Aguiar, J C G (2011). The ambivalent relation between state and illegal actors: piracy retail in Mexico. Etnográfica 15(1)DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.840 (accessed 19 December 2016).

Schwarz, A and Eckstein, L eds. (2014). Postcolonial piracy: Media distribution and cultural production in the global south. London: Bloomsbury.

Sundaram, R (2009). Pirate Modernity: Delhi’s Media Urbanism. London: Routledge. Quoted in Schwarz & Eckstein (2014) – see ref. 25.

Martin, J D III (2016). Piracy, Public Access, and Preservation: An Exploration of Sustainable Accessibility in a Public Torrent Index. SocArxiv, https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/hzp6r/ (accessed 19 December 2016).

Wolff, C, Rod, A B and Schonfeld, R C (2016). Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2015, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.282736 (accessed 19 December 2016).

Priego, E (2016). Signal, Not Solution: Notes on Why Sci-Hub Is Not Opening Access. The Winnower 3: e145624.49417.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15200/winn.145624.49417 (accessed 19 December 2016).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item