Oportunidad: Herramientas TIC para la Facilitación del Aprendizaje Universitario

Lau, Jesus and Machin-Mastromatteo, Juan-Daniel Oportunidad: Herramientas TIC para la Facilitación del Aprendizaje Universitario., 2015 . In V Jornadas de Dirección Creativa de Bibliotecas, Universidad de Carabobo: “Acceso Abierto a la Investigación”, Valencia, Venezuela, Noviembre 19-20, 2015. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Pon Valencia VNZL Rubrica TIC 15 completo.pdf
Download (836kB) | Preview

English abstract

In the processes of design, revision and execution of the curricular structure of the universities, we must consider aspects such as the subjects or objects of study, their relationships and the ways in which the learning of them can be evaluated. There are also aspects that are transversal to all syllabus, which are the integration of information literacy during the course and the use of different technologies that allow great diversity and innovation in the ways of teaching and learning. This paper presents a rubric that focuses on the use of technology and is divided into three stages that can be applied in the review and execution of syllabus by teachers. These stages are: a) a previous stage, consisting of applications for the use of information, develop the program, prepare learning objects and design the evaluation scheme; B) continuous stage during the course, with applications to carry out conceptual introductions, audiovisual presentations, communicate with students in and out of class, perform exercises and manage motivation and conflict resolution; And c) a closing phase, consisting of tools to evaluate and monitor learning through its progressive and summative evaluation, post-evaluation communication, correction and updating of syllabus and documentation of teaching experience. This work offers the rubric itself for the interested public, especially academics and librarians.

Spanish abstract

En los procesos del diseño, revisión y ejecución de la estructura curricular de las universidades, debemos considerar aspectos como los temas u objetos de estudio, sus relaciones y las maneras en que el aprendizaje de los mismos puede ser evaluado. También hay aspectos que son transversales a todos los programas de estudio (syllabus), los cuales son la integración de la alfabetización informacional durante el curso y el uso de distintas tecnologías que permitan gran diversidad e innovación en las formas de enseñar y aprender. Este trabajo presenta una rúbrica que se concentra en el uso de la tecnología y está dividida en tres etapas que pueden ser aplicadas en la revisión y ejecución de los syllabus por parte de los maestros. Estas etapas son: a) una etapa previa, consistente en aplicaciones para el uso de información, elaborar el programa, preparar objetos de aprendizaje y diseñar el esquema de evaluación; b) etapa continua durante el curso, con aplicaciones para realizar las introducciones conceptuales, presentaciones audiovisuales, comunicarse con alumnos en clase y fuera de ella, realizar ejercicios y manejar la motivación y resolución de conflictos; y c) una etapa de cierre, consistente en herramientas para evaluar y dar seguimiento al aprendizaje por medio de su evaluación progresiva y sumatoria, comunicación post-evaluatoria, corrección y actualización del syllabus y la documentación de la experiencia docente. Este trabajo ofrece la rúbrica en sí para el público interesado, especialmente académicos y bibliotecarios.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: tecnología educativa, pedagogía, rúbrica, syllabus, currículo, educación superior
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading.
Depositing user: Juan-Daniel Machin-Mastromatteo
Date deposited: 28 Mar 2017 12:32
Last modified: 28 Mar 2017 12:32
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/31061

References

Bellini, R., Butera, F., & Fuggetta, A. (2010). PROFESSIIONE IICT: Competenze e professionalità per l’innovazione digitale Rubrica a cura di. Mondo Digitale, 9(1), 92–97. Recuperado de http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952664489&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Bloom, J. (2006). Selected concepts of curriculum. Recuperado de http://www.jeffbloom.net/docs/SelectedConceptsOfCurriculum.pdf

Boss, K., y Drabinski, E. (2014). Evidence-based instruction integration: A syllabus analysis project. Reference Services Review, 42(2), 263–276.

Castro, A., y Eldermire, E. (2015). Laying the groundwork for information literacy at a research university. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 16(1), 4–17.

Cornell University (2014) Syllabus evaluation rubric. Recuperado de http://www.cte.cornell.edu/documents/Syllabus%20Rubric.pdf

Diller, K., y Phelps, S. (2008). Learning outcomes, portfolios, and rubrics, oh my! Authentic assessment of an information literacy program. Libraries and the Academy, 8(1), 75–89.

Gimeno, J. (2011). ¿Qué significa el currículum? En J. Gimeno (Coord.) Diseño, desarrollo e innovación del currículum. Madrid: Morata.

Hung, H.-T., Chiu, Y.-C. J., & Yeh, H.-C. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.x

Julien, H., Detlor, B., Serenko, A., Willson, R., y Lavallee, M. (2011). Preparing tomorrow’s decision makers: Learning environments and outcomes of information literacy instruction in business schools. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 16(4), 348–367.

Karnad, A. (2013) Embedding digital and information literacy into undergraduate teaching. Londres: Centre for Learning Technology. Recuperado de http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/51221/

Knight, L. (2006). Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 43–55.

Koh, J. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900. Recuperado de http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84890908745&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Lau, J., Bonilla, J., y Gárate, A. (2014). Diving into deep water: Development of an information literacy rubric. Information Literacy: Lifelong Learning and Digital Citizenship in the 21st Century; Communications in Computer and Information Science, 492, 570–579.

Lee, C. Y., & Cherner, T. S. (2015). A comprehensive evaluation rubric for assessing instructional apps. Journal of Information Technology Education, 14(1), 21–53. Recuperado de http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84928942450&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Lym, B., Grossman, H., Yannotta, L., y Talih, M. (2010). Assessing the assessment: How institutions administered, interpreted, and used SAILS. Reference Services Review, 38(1), 168–186.

Machin-Mastromatteo, J. (2015). The mutual shaping of social media, learning experiences, and literacies (Tesis doctoral). Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia. Recuperado de http://www.etera.ee/zoom/7273/view?page=1&p=separate&view=0,0,2067,2834

Mery, Y., Newby, J., y Peng, K. (2011). Assessing the reliability and validity of locally developed information literacy test items. Reference Services Review, 39(1), 98–122.

Mishra, P., y Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Plank, T., Villems, A., Pilt, L., Varendi, M., Sutt, E., Kampus, E., & Peiel, K. (2014). Rubrics for quality assessment of e-Learning course. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL (pp. 393–403). Academic Conferences Limited. Recuperado de http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84921629721&partnerID=tZOtx3y1

Quality Matters (2014). Quality Matters rubric. Recuperado de https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric

Reeves, T., y Harmon, S. (1994). Systematic evaluation procedures for interactive multimedia for education and training. En S. Reisman (Ed.) Multimedia Computing: Preparing for the 21st Century (pp. 472-505). Harrisburg: Idea Group Publishing.

Schilling, K., y Applegate, R. (2012). Best methods for evaluating educational impact: A comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100(4), 258–269.

Sharun, S., Edwards, M., Goebel, N., y Knoch, J. (2014). Institutions collaborating on an information literacy assessment tool. Library Management, 35(8/9), 538–546.

Smith, J., Given, L., Julien, H., Ouellette, D., y DeLong, K. (2013). Information literacy proficiency: Assessing the gap in high school students’ readiness for undergraduate academic work. Library and Information Science Research, 35(2), 88–96.

Steckelberg, A. L., Li, L., Liu, X., & Kozak, M. (2008). A Rubric for Self-Assessment of Essential Technology Conditions in Schools. Computers in the Schools, 25(1-2), 81–89. doi:10.1080/07380560802157899

Universal Design for Learning (2014) UDL syllabus rubric. Recuperado de http://enact.sonoma.edu/content.php?pid=218878&sid=2032318&p%20review=2992569949056263234954a15a575930

Wang, L. (2013). An IL integration model and its application in curriculum integration and staff development in higher education. Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice; Communications in Computer and Information Science, 397, 100–110.

White-Farnham, J., y Caffrey, C. (2014). Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Information literacy instruction in first-year writing. Reference Services Review, 42(2), 277–292.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS