Scientific profiles in the field of female genital mutilation/cutting

Biglu, Mohammad-Hossein and Alireza, Farnam and Abotalebi, Parvaneh Scientific profiles in the field of female genital mutilation/cutting. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics, 2017, vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 1-5. [Journal article (Paginated)]

Text (FGM/C)
scientific-profiles-in-the-field-of-female-genital-mutilationcutting-2157-7420-1000252_ Biglu.pdf - Published version

Download (795kB) | Preview

English abstract

Introduction: Females genital mutilation/Cutting is a harmful traditional procedure disturbing the health of girls and women. It has a continuing sexual, physiological and psychological influence on women health life. The objective of current study was to visualize and analyze the global scientific activities in the field of female genital mutilation/Cutting during a period of 15 years through 2001-2015. Methodology: A Scientometric analysis was carried out to depict the global activities towards scientific production in the field of female genital mutilation/cutting during a period of 15 years. The Core Collection of Web of Science database was employed to extract all papers indexed as a topic of female genital mutilation/cutting through 2001-2015. The Science of Science Tool was used to map the co-authorship network of papers in the field. Results: Analysis of data showed that, although the number of papers in the field of female genital mutilation/cutting was not remarkable, but it steady increased through the period of study, so that the number of papers in 2015 was two times greater than those in 2006. English consisting 94% of total publication was the language of publications. The vast majority of publication type was in the form of journal articles (65%). Based on the Bradford Scatterings law the journal of “International of Gynecology Obstetrics” was the most productive journal. USA, England and Australia were the most productive countries in the field. Conclusion: The study concluded that the research activities in the field of FGM/C regarding to the number of circumcised women in the world was very small and insufficient. The psychological aspects of FGM/C have been neglected by the scientists as well as the women health organizations.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: : Female genital mutilation; Co-authorship; Web of Science (WOS); Core collection; Scientific analysis
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
Depositing user: Mohammad Hossein Biglu
Date deposited: 02 May 2017 13:45
Last modified: 02 May 2017 13:45


1 OHCHR U, UNDP U, UNESCO U, UNHCR U, UNIFEM W. Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO. 2008.

2 Berg RC, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health care for women international. 2013; 34(10):837-859. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.721417.

3 Unicef, UNICEF. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: UNICEF. 2013.

4 Organization WH. Female genital mutilation: Information kit. 1999.

5 Organization WH. An update on WHO's work on female genital mutilation (FGM): Progress report. 2011.

6 Knipscheer J, Vloeberghs E, van der Kwaak A, van den Muijsenbergh M. Mental health problems associated with female genital mutilation. BJPsych Bull. 2015 Dec 1;39(6): 273-7.doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.047944.

7 UNFPA United Nations Population Fund. Female genital mutilation (FGM) frequently asked questions.

8 Biglu S, Biglu MH, Falk C. P01-511-Scientometric study of scientific production in psychiatry. European Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 31;26:515. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72222-2.

9 Biglu M-H, Biglu S. Scientific attitudes towards bipolar disorders. J Analyt Res Clin Med. 2014;2(1):1-10. doi: 10.5681/jarcm.2014.001.

10 Biglu M-H, Ghavami M, Biglu S. Authorship, institutional and citation metrics for publications on postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis International. 2014;25(4):1337-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2603-3.

11 Nations U. International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation, 6 February [cited 2017]. Available from:

12 UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: a global concern. New York: UNICEF. 2016:1-4.

13. Sweileh WM. Bibliometric analysis of literature on female genital mutilation:(1930–2015). Reproductive health. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):130.

14 Eisold BK. Female Genital Mutilation and its Aftermath in a Woman who Wished to “Have a Life:” Submission as a Route to the Preservation of Personal Agency. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 2015 Apr 1. doi: 10.1002/aps.1440.

15 Pechmann C, Petermann F, Schmidt S, Nitkowski D, Koebach A, Ruf M, Elbert T. Coping Process in Women with FGM from Ethiopia-The Contribution of Attitude. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie. 2016 Nov;66(11):421. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107803

16 Biglu MH, Asgharzadeh A. The prevalence of stress factor among medicine students in Iran. European Psychiatry 2011;26:1577. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)73281-3.

17 Biglu M-H, Riazi S. Network of nanomedicine researches: impact of Iranian scientists. BioImpacts: BI. 2015;5(4):199. doi: 10.15171/bi.2015.29.

18 Glynn RW, Scutaru C, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysis. Breast Cancer Research. 2010;12(6):1. doi: 10.1186/bcr2795


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item