Analysis of Work-to-Work Bibliographic Relationships through FRBR: A Canadian Perspective

1. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Final Report. Approved by the Standing Committee of the Cataloguing Section on September 1997 as amended and correct through February 2009. http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf, 55.

2. Ibid., 55–56.

3. Zhang Ying, “Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications: A Bibliographic Study of the Chinese Collections of the East Asia Resources at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill” (master’s thesis, University of North Carolina, 2003), 5.

4. Zorana Ercegovac, “Multiple-Version Resources in Digital Libraries: Towards User-Centered Displays,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57, no. 8 (2006): 1023–1032.

5. Barbara B. Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships,” in Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, ed. Carol A. Bean and Rebecca Green (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001), 19–35.

6. Barbara B. Tillett, “What is FRBR?: A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe,” The Australian Library Journal 54, no. 1 (2005): 24–30, http://alia.org.au/publishing/alj/54.1/full.text/tillett.html

7. Patrick Le Boeuf, “FRBR and Further,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2001): 15–52.

8. Barbara B. Tillett, “FRBR and Cataloging for the Future,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39, no. 3/4 (2005), 197–205.

9. Rick Bennett, Brian F. Lavoie, and Edward T. O’Neill, “The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: An Application of FRBR,” Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services 27, no. 1 (2003): 45–59, doi:10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00306-8; Akiko Hashizume, “Characteristics of Works in a Japanese Library Catalog from the View Point of FRBR: A Case Study of Keio University Library OPAC Case Study,” Library and Information Science no. 58 (2007): 33–48; Jan Pisanski and Maja Žumer, “Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: An Investigation of Two Prototypes,” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 41, no. 4 (2007): 400–417; Jeong-Hyen Kim and Ji-Hyun Moon, “Korean Books and FRBR: An Investigation,” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 44, no. 3 (2010): 215–228.

10. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, 56.

11. Maja Žumer, “FRBR: The End of the Road or a New Beginning?,” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33, no. 6 (2007): 27–29.

12. Barbara B. Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships: Toward a Conceptual Structure of Bibliographic Information Used in Cataloging” (PhD diss., UCLA, 1987).

13. Pat Riva, “Mapping MARC 21 Linking Entry Fields to FRBR and Tillett’s Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships,” Library Resources and Technical Services 48, no. 2 (2004): 130–43.

14. Richard P. Smiraglia, “Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships” (PhD diss., University of Chicago 1992).

15. Richard P. Smiraglia, “Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: Linkages in the Bibliographic Universe,” in Navigating the Networks: Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting, ed. D. L. Andersen, T. J. Galvin, and M. D. Giguere (Medford, NJ: ASIS, 1994), 167–183.

16. Sherry L. Vellucci, Bibliographic Relationships in Music Catalogs (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 1997).

17. See Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships.”

18. Barbara B. Tillett, “A Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships,” Library Resources and Technical Services, 35, no. 2 (1991): 150–158.

19. See Smiraglia, “Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships.”

20. Sholeh Arastoopoor and Rahmatollah Fattahi, “Identification and Categorization of Related Works in the Persian Bibliographic Universe: An FRBR Approach,” International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 39, no. 1 (2010): 12–18.

21. See Tillett, “A Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships.”

22. Rick Bennett, Brian F. Lavoie, and Edward T. O’Neill, “The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: An Application of FRBR,” Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services 27, no. 1 (2003), 45–59, http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/2003/lavoie_frbr.pdf

23. Jan Pisanski and Maja Žumer, “Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: An Investigation of Two Prototypes,” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 41, no. 4 (2007), 400–417; also see Žumer, “FRBR.”

24. AMICUS: http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/amicus/

25. Library and Archives Canada. “What is AMICUS?”, http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/amicus/006002-122-e.html

26. English keywords: sequel; prequel; supplement; activity book; adaptation; addenda; addendum; administrator guide; answer book; answer key; based on; educator guide; educator’s companion; e-solutions manual; imitation; instructor guide; instructor manual; instructor’s resource; lab manual; laboratory manual; literature book; parent guide; parents guide; solution manual; solutions manual; solutions manual; student book; student CD; summarization; summary; teacher’s guide; . . . French keywords: cahier d’exercice; cahier d’exercices; cahier d’activités; cahier d’apprentissage; cahier de l’´el`eve; cahier de savoirs; cahier des exercices; cahier d’exercices; cahier exercice; corrigé des exercices; fichier de l’´el`eve; guide d’enseignement; guide d’apprentissage; guide de l’´etudiant; guide des étudiants; guide pédagogique; kit d’enseignement; livre d’activités; livre d’exercices; manuel d’enseignement; manuel d’apprentissage; manuel de lecture; manuel de l’´el`eve; manuel de l’´etudiant; ...

27. DDC class numbers were collected from the 082 field of the LAC records when available. If no 082 field was present, data found in the 055 field (LC class number) was used and converted to a DDC number using the conversion table available on OCLC’s Question Point reference service (http://www.questionpoint.org/).

28. See Ying, “Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications,” Vellucci, Bibliographic Relationships in Music Catalogs, and Bennett, Lavoie, and O’Neill, “The Concept of a Work in WorldCat.”

29. See Ying, “Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications” and Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships.”

30. Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships.”

31. See Smiraglia, “Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships.”

32. See Ying, “Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications,” Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships,” Smiraglia, “Authority Control and the Extent of Derivative Bibliographic Relationships,” and Vellucci, Bibliographic Relationships in Music Catalogs

33. Richard P. Smiraglia and Gregory H. Leazer, “Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: The Work Relationship in a Global Bibliographic Database,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50, no. 6 (1999): 493–504.

34. Ibid., 503.

35. Ibid., 501.

36. See Ying, “Bibliographic Relationships among Chinese Publications,” Tillett, “Bibliographic Relationships,” and Vellucci, Bibliographic Relationships in Music Catalogs.