Plataformas de descubrimiento en bibliotecas universitarias: evaluación de Worldcat Local en el contexto de una biblioteca caribeña

Montalvo-Montalvo, Marilyn Plataformas de descubrimiento en bibliotecas universitarias: evaluación de Worldcat Local en el contexto de una biblioteca caribeña. Anales de Documentación, 2017, vol. 20, n. 2, pp. 1-17. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
PLATAFORMAS DE DESCUBRIMIENTO EN BIBLIOTECAS UNIVERSITARIAS5-WCL.pdf - Accepted version
Download (504kB) | Preview

English abstract

A thorough assessment of Worldcat Local (WCL) is presented, in light of its implementation at the Library System of the University of Puerto Rico in Rio Piedras (LS). First, a description of its structure, content coverage, configuration process and search interface is provided, in order to explore their impact on the discovery experience. Second, the results of a survey conducted among the academic community to find out its views about the discovery tool are offered. It is concluded that, although WCL has not fulfilled the expectations of the LS from an administrative perspective, users value the availability of a tool that allows them to speed up information search.

Spanish abstract

Se presenta una evaluación amplia de Worldcat Local (WCL), a la luz de su implementación en el Sistema de Bibliotecas de la Universidad de Puerto Rico en Río Piedras (SB). Primeramente, se realiza una descripción detallada de su estructura, alcance, proceso de configuración e interfaz de búsqueda para explorar cómo sus rasgos inciden en la experiencia de descubrimiento. En segundo lugar, se ofrecen los resultados de un sondeo realizado entre la comunidad universitaria para conocer su opinión sobre el metabuscador. Se concluye que, si bien WCL no ha llenado las expectativas del SB desde la óptica administrativa, los usuarios valoran la disponibilidad de una herramienta que les permita agilizar la búsqueda de información.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: plataformas de descubrimiento, herramientas de descubrimiento, metabuscadores, evaluación de plataformas de descubrimiento, bibliotecas universitarias, Caribe, Puerto Rico, Worldcat Local, discovery tools, evaluation of discovery tools, Caribbean Area, academic libraries
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Marilyn Montalvo-Montalvo
Date deposited: 16 Jan 2018 11:47
Last modified: 16 Jan 2018 11:47
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/31593

References

ALVITE DÍEZ, M. L. Redefiniendo el catálogo: expectativas de las interfaces de descubrimiento centradas en el usuario. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 2012, vol. 2 no 56, p. 181-204.

ÁVILA GARCÍA, L., ORTIZ REPISO, V. y RODRÍGUEZ MATEOS, D. Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única? Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 2015, Vol. 38, no 1, doi: 10.3989/redc.2015.1.1178

BADKE, W. The convenience factor in information seeking. Online Searcher, 2014, vol. 38, no 6, p. 68-70.

BOYD, J. y otros. The one-box challenge: providing a federated search that benefits the research process. Serials Review, 2006, vol. 32, no 4, p. 247-254.

BRAND, A., DALY, F. y MEYERS, B. Metadata demystified: a guide for publishers. Hanover, Pennsylvania: NISO Press, Sheridan Press, 2003.

BREEDING, M. Library resource discovery products: context, library perspectives, and vendor positions. Library Technology Reports, 2014, vol. 50, no 1, p. 1-58.

BREEDING, M. Libraries.org: a directory of libraries throughout the world. 2016. Disponible en: http://librarytechnology.org/libraries [Consultado: 17 de mayo de 2016]

BUTLER, A. y THOMPSON, L. Implementing discovery at the University of Alabama. The Southeastern Librarian, 2013, vol. 61, no 1, p. 44-47.

CONNAWAY, L. S. y RANDALL, K. M. Why the Internet is more attractive than the library. The Serials Librarian, 2013, vol. 64, no 1-4, p. 41-56.

CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. Discovery and access: recommendation and report. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Library, 2011.

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE LIBRARY. An evaluation of Serial Solutions Summon as a discovery service for the Dartmouth College Library. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Library. 2009. Disponible en: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/admin/docs/Summon_Report.pdf?mswitch-redir=classic [Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2016]

DJENNO, M., INSUA, G., GREGORY, G. M. y BRANTLEY, J. S. Discovering usability: comparing two discovery systems at one academic library. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2014, vol. 8, no 3, p. 263-285.

FAWLEY, N. y KRYSAK, N. Learning to love your discovery tool: strategies for integrating a discovery tool in face-to-face, synchronous, and asynchronous instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 2014, .vol. 10, no 4, p. 83-301.

GEORGAS, H. Google vs. the library: student preferences and perceptions when doing research using Google and a federated search tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2013, vol. 13 no 2, p. 165-185.

GEORGAS, H. Google vs. the library (Part II): student search patterns and behaviors when using Google and a federated search tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2014, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 503-532.

GLASSER, S. Broken links and failed access: how KBART, IOTA, and PIE-J can help. Library Resources & Technical Services, 2011, vol. 56, no 1, p. 14-23.

GOODSETT, M. Discovery search tools: a comparative study. Reference Reviews, 2014, vol. 28, no 6, p. 2-8.

HERRRERA, G. Metasearching and beyond: implementation experiences and advice from an academic library. Information Technology & Libraries, 2007, vol. 24, no 2, p. 44-52.

KELLEY, M. Coming into focus: web-scale discovery services face growing need for best practices. Library Journal, 2012, vol. 137, no 17, p. 34-40.

KING, D. Many libraries have gone to federated searching to win users back from Google: is it working? Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 2008, vol. 20, no 4, p. 213-227.

KULP, C., MCCAIN, C. y SCRIVENER, L. Teaching outside the box: ARL librarian's integration of the "One-Box" into student instruction. College & Research Libraries, 2014, vol. 75, no 3, p. 298-308.

NFAIS. Survey comparison on discovery service participation and perceptions. Annapolis, MD.: NFAIS, 2014. Disponible en: https://nfais.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/BestPractices/2014_surveycomparisons_disc.pdf [Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2016]

NISO. Understanding metadata. Bethseda, MD: NISO, 2004. Disponible en: http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf

[Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2016]

OCLC. Databases and collections in Worldcat Local. 2016a. Disponible en: https://www.oclc.org/worldcat-local/content/dblist.en.html

[Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2016].

OCLC. WorldCat knowledge base. 2016b. Disponible en: https://www.oclc.org/knowledge-base.en.html

[Consulta: 17 de mayo de 2016].

PARRY, M. As researchers turn to Google, libraries navigate the messy world of discovery tools. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2014, vol. 60, no 32, p. 18.

POPP, M. P. y Dallis, D. Planning and implementing resource discovery tools in academic libraries. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012.

PRESCOTT, L. y ERWAY, R. Single search: the quest for the Holy Grail. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC, 2011.

SPINK, A. y otros. Searching the web: the public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, vol. 52, no 3, p. 226-234.

STRYKOWSKI, J. Advanced vs. basic search: digital perception and library learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2015, vol. 41, no 5, p. 689-691.

TENNANT, R. The right solution: federated search tools. Library Journal, 2003, vol.128, no 11, p. 28-30.

TRAINOR, C. y PRICE, J. Rethinking library linking: breathing new life into open url. Library Technology Reports, 2010, vol. 46, no 7, p.5-35.

VAUGHAN, J. Webscale discovery services. Library Technology Reports, 2011, vol. 47, no 1, p. 5-61.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS