Predatory Open Access Journals Publishing: What, Why and How?

Pujar, Shamprasad M Predatory Open Access Journals Publishing: What, Why and How?, 2017 . In National Conference on the Role of LIS Professionals in the Changing Academic Paradigm, Bangalore (India), 17-18 February 2018. [Conference paper]

predatory-publishing.pdf - Submitted version

Download (336kB) | Preview

English abstract

The Internet has transformed scholarly publishing and made the availability of online resources possible, both in subscription and open access models. Open access, has enabled wider access to the scholarly literature, thus reducing the digital divide among the haves and have-nots. In the case of journal articles, even though its ‘Gold’ (author pays model) and ‘Green’ access models have risen to the occasion, but some publishers of journals have turned its ‘Gold’ model to their advantage to earn a profit by charging fees for publication and adopting certain unethical practices of publishing. An effort has been made here to explore what is ‘Predatory’ open access journals publishing, why this kind of publishing is flourishing and how this model works.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Open access journal,Predatory journals
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Shamprasad Pujar
Date deposited: 08 Oct 2018 06:06
Last modified: 08 Oct 2018 06:06


Beall, J. (2015). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. Retrieved from

Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s list: better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76(3), 132–135.

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60–65. doi:

Craft, A. R. (2016). Is this a quality journal to publish in? How can you tell? Serials Review, 42(3), 237–239.doi:

Elliott, Carl (2012). On predatory publishers: a Q&A with Jeffrey Beall – Brainstorm - Blogs - The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from

Hansoti, B., Langdorf, M. I., & Murphy, L. S. (2016). Discriminating between legitimate and predatory Open Access journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(5), 497–507. doi : https://doi.org10.5811westjem.2016.7.30328.

Martin, A., & Martin, T. (2016). A not-so-harmless experiment in predatory open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 301–305. doi: https://doi.org10.1002/leap.1060.

Prasad, R. (2012). On the net, a scam of a most scholarly kind. Retrieved from

Rich, Timothy S. Predatory publishing, Open Access and costs to academia. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(2), 265-267. Retrieved from

Segran, E. (2015). Why a fake article titled “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?” was accepted by 17 medical journals. Retrieved from

UGC (2010). UGC regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in universities and colleges and measures for the maintenance of standards in higher Education. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. Predatory Open Access publishing. Retrieved from

Yould Ltd. (2017). Growth in predatory publishers. Retrieved from


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item