Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web : A comparison of four conceptual models

Zapounidou, Sofia and Sfakakis, Michalis and Papatheodorou, Christos Representing and integrating bibliographic information into the Semantic Web : A comparison of four conceptual models. Journal of Information Science, 2017, vol. 43, n. 4, pp. 525-553. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
JIS2016_postprint.pdf
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

Integration of library data into the Semantic Web environment is a key issue for libraries and is approached on the basis of interoper- ability between conceptual models. Several data models exist for the representation and publication of library data in the Semantic Web and therefore inter-domain and intra-domain interoperability issues emerge as a growing number of web data are generated. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and other cultural heritage institutions shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to investigate common ground and convergences between four conceptual models, namely Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), FRBR Object-Oriented (FRBRoo), Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME) and Europeana Data Model (EDM), enabling semantically-richer interoperability by studying the representation of monographs, as well as of content relationships (derivative and equivalent bibliographic relationships) and of whole-part relationships between them.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME); conceptual models; Europeana Data Model (EDM); Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); FRBR Object-Oriented (FRBRoo); interoperability; Linked Data; Semantic Web
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
I. Information treatment for information services > IL. Semantic web
Depositing user: Sofia Zapounidou
Date deposited: 28 Dec 2017 14:56
Last modified: 28 Dec 2017 14:56
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/32105

References

[1] IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf (2009).

[2] Bekiari C, Doerr M, Le Boeuf P et al. FRBR Object-Oriented Definition and Mapping from FRBRer, FRAD and FRSAD (ver- sion 2.4). Paris, http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/frbr_oo/frbr_docs/FRBRoo_V2.4.pdf (2015, accessed December 2015).

[3] Miller E, Ogbuji U, Mueller V et al. Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2012, http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/pdf/marcld-report-11–21–2012.pdf (2012, accessed 6 October 2015).

[4] Isaac A. Europeana Data Model Primer, http://pro.europeana.eu/edm-documentation (2014).

[5] Digital Public Library of America. Metadata application profile, version 4.0, http://dp.la/info/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ MAPv4.pdf (2015).

[6] Lagoze C, Sompel H Van De, Johnston P et al. Open Archives Initiative Object Reuse and Exchange ORE Specification - Abstract Data Model, http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel (2008).

[7] Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version .1, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (2012, accessed 6 October 2015).

[8] Miles A and Bechhofer S. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Namespace Document - HTML Variant: 8 August 2009 Recommendation Edition, http://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html (2009, accessed 6 October 2015).

[9] Le Bœuf P, Doerr M, Ore CE et al. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, version 6.1. Paris, http://www.cidoc- crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_6.1.pdf (2015, accessed July 2015).

[10] Hickey TB and O’Neill ET. FRBRizing OCLC’s WorldCat. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2009; 39: 239–251.

[11] Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office. FRBR Display Tool Version 2.0, www.loc.gov/marc/ marc-functional-analysis/tool.html (2009, accessed July 2015).

[12] Aalberg T, Haugen F and Husby O. A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR. In: Gonzalo J, Thanos C, Verdejo MF et al. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries SE - 41. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 453–456.

[13] Freire N, Borbinha J and Calado P. Identification of FRBR Works Within Bibliographic Databases: An Experiment with UNIMARC and Duplicate Detection Techniques. In: Goh D-L, Cao T, Sølvberg I et al. (eds) Asian Digital Libraries. Looking Back 0 Years and Forging New Frontiers SE - 36. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 267–276.

[14] Sfakakis M and Kapidakis S. Eliminating query failures in a work-centric library meta-search environment. Library Hi Tech 2009; 27: 286–307.

[15] Chen Y-N and Ke H-R. FRBRoo-based approach to heterogeneous metadata integration. Journal of Documentation 2013; 69: 623–637.

[16] Doerr M, Gradmann S, Le Boeuf P et al. Final Report on EDM – FRBRoo Application Profile Task Force, http://pro.europeana. eu/files/Europeana_Professional/EuropeanaTech/EuropeanaTech_taskforces/EDM_FRBRoo/TaskfoApplicationProfileEDM- FRBRoo.pdf (2013, accessed 6 October 2015).

[17] Zapounidou S, Sfakakis M and Papatheodorou C. Highlights of Library Data Models in the Era of Linked Open Data. In:Garoufallou E and Greenberg J (eds) Metadata and Semantics Research SE - 38. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2013, pp. 396–407.

[18] Svensson LG. Are current bibliographic models suitable for integration with the web? Information Standards Quarterly 2013; 25: 7–13.

[19] Bennett R, Lavoie BF and O’Neill ET. The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: An Application of FRBR. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 2003; 27: 45–59.

[20] Zˇumer M and O’Neill ET. Modeling Aggregates in FRBR. Cataloging & Classification Quartery 2012; 50: 456–472.

[21] O’Neill E, Zˇumer M and Mixter J. FRBR Aggregates: Their Types and Frequency in Library Collections. Library Resoures & Technical Services 2015; 59: 20–129.

[22] Cervantes project: Cervantes collection, http://cervantes.tamu.edu (accessed 6 October 2015).

[23] Stavans I. One Master, Many Cervantes: Don Quixote in translation. Humanities: The Magazine of the National Endowment for the Humanities 2008; 29, http://www.neh.gov/humanities/2008/septemberoctober/feature/one-master-many-cervantes (2008).

[24] International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A conceptual model. Mu¨nchen: KG Saur, 2009.

[25] IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD): A Conceptual Model. The Hague, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/func- tional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf (2010, accessed 6 October 2015).

[26] Riva P and Zˇumer M. Introducing the FRBR Library Reference Model. In: IFLA WLIC 2015. Cape Town, South Africa, http://library.ifla.org/1084/1/207-riva-en.pdf (2015, accessed 7 July 2015).

[27] Tillett B. What is FRBR?: A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2004, www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF (2004).

[28] O’Neill E, Cato A, Goossens P et al. Final Report of the Working Group on Aggregates. Oslo, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/ cataloguing/frbrrg/AggregatesFinalReport.pdf (2011, accessed July 2015).

[29] IFLA FRBR Working group on Aggregates. Differences between the works-of-works (Tillett) and the manifestation-of-expres- sions (O’Neill-Zˇumer) definitions of aggregates. Milan, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/aggregates-defini tion-differences.pdf (2009, accessed 6 October 2015).

[30] IFLA. Working Group on Aggregates, http://www.ifla.org/node/923 (2014, accessed 6 October 2015).

[31] Tillett B. Definition of Aggregates as Works: Tillett Proposal. Milan, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/aggre- gates-as-works.pdf (2009, accessed 22 June 2014).

[32] O’Neill E and Zˇumer M. Aggregates as Manifestations: O’Neill & Zˇumer Proposal. Milan, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbrrg/aggregates-as-manifestations.pdf (2009, accessed 6 October 2015).

[33] Library of Congress. A Bibliographic Framework for the Digital Age. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 2011, http:// www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/framework-103111.html (2011, accessed July 2013).

[34] Denenberg R, Ashton J, Boughida K et al. BIBFRAME Annotation Model: BIBFRAME Community Draft, 26 August 2013, http://bibframe.org/documentation/annotations/ (2013).

[35] BIBFRAME – Bibliographic Framework Initiative. BIBFRAME Authorities: Draft Specification – 28 April 2014, http:// www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-authorities.html (2014, accessed 6 October 2015).

[36] BIBFRAME.org. On BIBFRAME Authority 5 August 2013, http://bibframe.org/documentation/bibframe-authority/ (2013, accessed 3 July 2015).

[37] BIBFRAME - Bibliographic Framework Initiative. BIBFRAME Relationships: Draft Specification, 25 April 2014, http:// www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-relationships.html (2014, accessed 6 October 2015).

[38] BIBFRAME – Bibliographic Framework Initiative. BIBFRAME Profiles: Introduction and Specification (Draft – 5 May 2014), http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-profiles.html (2014, accessed 6 October 2015).

[39] Europeana. Europeana Semantic Elements Specification and Guidelines, http://pro.europeana.eu/share-your-data/data-guide- lines/ese-documentation (2013, accessed July 2015).

[40] Angjeli A, Bayerische M, Chambers S et al. D5.1 Report on the alignment of library metadata with the European Data Model (EDM) Version 2.0, http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/confluence/download/attachments/12091395/D5.1_EDM_for_libraries_ v2.0.pdf (2012, accessed 6 October 2015).

[41] Europeana. Definition of the Europeana Data Model v5.2.6, http://pro.europeana.eu/page/edm-documentation (2014, accessed July 2015).

[42] Tillett B. A taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Libr Resour Tech Serv 991; 35: 50–158.

[43] Smiraglia R and Leazer G. Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 999; 50: 493–504, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:6%3C493::AID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO;2-U/abstract (1999, accessed 9 February 2015).

[44] Smiraglia R. Authority control and the extent of derivative bibliographic relationships [Thesis]. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago, 992.

[45] IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report. The Hague: Saur, 998, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr.pdf (1998, accessed 6 October 2015).

[46] IFLA Working Group on the Expression Entity. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Chapter 3: Entities Changes approved to the FRBR text Clean Version, http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/amend-1998–1-clean.pdf (2007).

[47] Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. DCMI metadata terms, http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms (2012, accessed 6 October 2015).

[48] Urban RJ. The :1 Principle in the Age of Linked Data. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications; DC-2014, Austin Texas, U.S.A., http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2014/paper/view/263 (2014).

[49] Haslhofer B and Klas W. A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys 2010; 42: 7, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1667062.1667064 (2010).

[50] Denton W. FRBR and the History of Cataloging. In: Taylor AG (ed) Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007, pp. 35–58, http://hdl.handle.net/10315/1250 (2007).

[51] Simonton W. The bibliographical control of microforms. Library Resources & Technical Services 962; 6: 29–40.

[52] Telerski RM. Bibliographic Control of Preservation Photocopies. Kent State University, http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390399 (1995).

[53] Spalding CS, American Library Association, Library of Congress, et al. Anglo-American cataloguing rules. London: Library Association, 967.

[54] Gorman M, Winkler PW and American Library Association. Anglo-American cataloguing rules. Chicago, IL: ALA, 978.

[55] Le Boeuf P. An example of library and museum cooperation: the FRBROO conceptual model. In: CIDOC Annual Conference, Enriching Cultural Heritage, Helsinki, 0.-14.06.2012. Helsinki, http://network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/ cidoc/ConferencePapers/2012/le-boeuf-keynote.pdf (2012).

[56] Kondylakis H, Doerr M and Plexousakis D. Mapping Language for Information Integration. Technical report 385. Heraklion, Crete, Greece, http://www.ics.forth.gr/tech-reports/2006/2006.TR385_Mapping_Language_Information_Integration.pdf (2006).

[57] Oldman D, de Doerr M, de Jong G et al. Realizing Lessons of the Last 20 Years: A Manifesto for Data Provisioning and Aggregation Services for the Digital Humanities (A Position Paper) System. D-Lib Magazine 2014; 20, http://doi.org/10.1045/ july2014-oldman (2014, accessed 5 December 2015).

[58] Predoiu L, Martin-Recuerda F, Polleres A et al. D1.5 A framework for representing ontologies consisting of several thousand concepts definitions, http://dip.semanticweb.org/documents/D1.5_FrameworkforRepresentingOntologyNetworks.pdf (2004, accessed 5 January 2016).

[59] Zapounidou S, Sfakakis M and Papatheodorou C. Library Data Integration: Towards BIBFRAME Mapping to EDM. Communications in Computer Science 2014; 478: 262–273, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–13674–5_25 (2014).

[60] Lourdi I, Papatheodorou C and Doerr M. Semantic integration of collection description. D-Lib Magazine 2009; 5: 082–9873, http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/july2009-papatheodorou (2009).

[61] Gergatsoulis M, Bountouri L, Gaitanou P et al Query transformation in a CIDOC CRM based cultural metadata integration envi- ronment. In: Lalmas M, Jose J, Rauber A et al. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 4th European Conference, ECDL 2010, Glasgow, UK, September 6–10, 2010. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 38–45, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978–3–642–15464–5_6 (2010).

[62] National Library of Medicine. Experimentation with BIBFRAME at the National Library of Medicine – June 24, 2015, Update, https://github.com/fallgrennj/BIBFRAME-NLM (2015, accessed 7 July 2015).


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Altmetric
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS