Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfolios

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1998). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL:Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Engels, T.C.E., Goos, P., Dexters, N., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (2013). Group size, h-index, and efficiency in publishing in top journals explain expert panel assessments of research group quality and productivity. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 224-236.

Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.

Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.

Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.

Molas-Gallart, J., Rafols, I., & Tang, P. (2014). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and impact: different modalities of interdisciplinarity lead to different types of impact. Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 29(2), 69-89.

Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1–2), 69–92.

Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.

Rahman, A.I.M.J., Guns, R., Leydesdorff, L., & Engels, T.C.E. (2016a). Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1639-1663.

Rahman, A.I.M.J., Guns, R., Rousseau, R., & Engels, T.C.E. (2015). Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 704–721.

Rahman, A.I.M.J., Guns, R., Rousseau, R., & Engels, T.C.E. (2016b). Corrigendum to “Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters” [Journal of Informetrics 9 (4) (2015) 704–721].

Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1052-1054.

Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: a new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In H.-J. Lenz. & R. Decker (Eds.). Advances in Data Analysis: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (pp. 299-306). Springer.

Wang, Q., & Sandström, U. (2015). Defining the role of cognitive distance in the peer review process with an explorative study of a grant scheme in infection biology. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 271-281.

Zhou, Q., Rousseau, R., Yang, L., Yue, T., & Yang, G. (2012). A general framework for describing diversity within systems and similarity between systems with applications in informetrics. Scientometrics, 93(3), 787-812.