Determining cognitive distance between publication portfolios of evaluators and evaluees in research evaluation : a case study of Chemistry department

Rahman, A. I. M. Jakaria and Guns, Raf Determining cognitive distance between publication portfolios of evaluators and evaluees in research evaluation : a case study of Chemistry department., 2017 [Technical report]

[thumbnail of Technical Report_Chemistry.pdf]
Preview
 Text
Technical Report_Chemistry.pdf
Download (6MB) | Preview

English abstract

This technical report is prepared in the context of A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman’s PhD project on Determining cognitive distance between publication portfolios of evaluators and evaluees in research evaluation: Exploration of informetric methods. Similar technical reports on Biology, Biomedical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Physics and Veterinary Sciences department are also available at the institutional repository of the University of Antwerp (https://repository.uantwerpen.be).

Item type: Technical report
Keywords: Barycenter; Bootstrapping; Cognitive distances; Confidence intervals; Expert panel; Journal overlay map; Matching research expertise; Overlay maps; Research evaluation; Similarity matrix; Similarity-adapted publication vector; Web of Science subject categories; Weighted cosine similarity.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman
Date deposited: 05 Mar 2018 11:18
Last modified: 05 Mar 2018 11:18
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/32404

References

Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern Multidimensional Scaling. New York, NY: Springer New York.

de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2012). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (2nd edition). England ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1998). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to Informetrics. Elsevier Science Publishers. Retrieved from https://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/587

Huson, L. W. (2007). Performance of some correlation coefficients when applied to zero-clustered data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(2), 530–536.

Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J. (1987). A measure of Top-Down correlation. Technometrics, 29(3), 351–357.

Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2001). An introduction to the barycentre method with an application to China’s mean centre of publication. Libri, 51(4), 225–233.

Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15.

Kington, J. (2014). Balanced Cross Sections, Shortening Estimates, and the Magnitude of Out-of-Sequence Thrusting in the Nankai Trough Accretionary Prism, Japan. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1015774.v1

Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.

Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.

Leydesdorff, L., Rafols, I., & Chen, C. (2013). Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2573–2586.

Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.

Rahman, A. I. M. J., Guns, R., Leydesdorff, L., & Engels, T. C. E. (2016). Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level. Scientometrics.

Rousseau, R. (1989). Kinematical statistics of scientific output. Part II: standardized polygonal approach. Revue Française de Bibliométrie, 4, 65–77.

Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 4(15), 707–719.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A New Method for Visualizing Similarities Between Objects. In R. Decker & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Advances in Data Analysis (pp. 299–306). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric Mapping: Multidimensional Scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416.

Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2013). Measuring internationalisation of book publishing in the social sciences and humanities using the barycentre method. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Horlesberger, & H. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (ISSI), 15 - 19 July 2013 (pp. 1170–1176). Vienna, Austria.

Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Barycenter representation of book publishing internationalization in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 234–240.

VSNU. (2003). Standard Evaluation Protocol 2003-2009 for Public Research Organisations. Utrecht/den Haag/Amsterdam: VSNU, NWO and KNAW.

VSNU, KNAW, & NWO. (2014). Standard evaluation Protocol 2015-2021: protocol for research assessment in The Netherlands. Utrecht/den Haag/Amsterdam: VSNU, NWO and KNAW.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS