O contributo das bibliotecas para a «vida do laboratório»: uma cartografia internacional teórica e prática

Revez, Jorge and Borges, Maria Manuel and Silva, Carlos Guardado da O contributo das bibliotecas para a «vida do laboratório»: uma cartografia internacional teórica e prática. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 2018, vol. 14, n. 2, pp. 193-206. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
2018 REVEZ BORGES SILVA O Contributo das bibliotecas para a vida do laboratorio.pdf
Download (355kB) | Preview

English abstract

Objective. The need for access to scientific information, as an indispensable condition for the generation of new knowledge, places the information problem in a central role in the production and dissemination of science. In the relation between information and science, we questioned the place that libraries occupy. Design/Methodology/Approach. International literature on the role of libraries in scientific research was retrieved and analyzed. From a content analysis, the literature was grouped into five categories that form the theoretical framework. Given its relevance, special attention was paid to empirical work carried out in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Spain. Results/Discusion. It presented a bipartite structure -theoretical framework and empirical studies- that gives shape to the state of the art. In the first part, the dimensions converging to a theoretical definition of the problem of the role of libraries in scientific research are briefly presented. In the second part, we presented international work focusing particularly on empirical investigation regarding the support that these information systems provide for scientific research. Conclusions. Libraries occupy a place that is in deep reconfiguration. On the one hand, the generalized provision of information seems to render the role of libraries unnecessary, but on the other hand, libraries remain on their mission to add value, offer new services and products, and contribute to scientific development. The state of the art on the relationship between libraries and research demonstrates the robustness and relevance of this research line, and underlines the importance of empirical studies which allows an approximation to the relational complexity present in «laboratory life». Originality/Value. It is a systematic analysis of literature relevant to the topic, where it is built a dialogue between the theoretical and empirical dimensions, from the studies that dealt with the relationship between libraries and scientific research.

Portuguese abstract

Objetivo. A necessidade do acesso à informação científica, enquanto condição indispensável para a geração de novo conhecimento, confere à informação um papel central na produção e disseminação da ciência. Na relação entre informação e ciência, interroga-se o lugar que as bibliotecas ocupam. Desenho/Metodologia/Enfoque. Foi realizada uma recolha e análise da literatura internacional sobre o papel das bibliotecas na investigação científica. A partir da análise do seu conteúdo, a literatura foi agrupada em cinco categorias que formam o enquadramento teórico. Pela sua relevância, foi dada especial atenção aos trabalhos empíricos desenvolvidos no Reino Unido, Estados Unidos da América e Espanha. Resultados/Discussão. É apresentada uma estrutura bipartida - enquadramento teórico e estudos empíricos - que dá forma ao estado da arte. Na primeira parte, apresentam-se de forma breve as dimensões que convergem para uma definição teórica do problema do papel das bibliotecas na investigação científica. Na segunda parte, são apresentados os trabalhos internacionais que incidem particularmente na investigação empírica do apoio que estes sistemas de informação prestam à investigação científica. Conclusão. As bibliotecas ocupam um lugar que está em profunda reconfiguração. Por um lado, a oferta generalizada de informação parece tornar dispensável o papel das bibliotecas, mas por outro as bibliotecas permanecem na sua missão de acrescentar valor, oferecendo novos serviços e produtos, e contribuindo para o desenvolvimento científico. O estado da arte sobre a relação entre as bibliotecas e a investigação demonstra, de forma cabal, a robustez e a pertinência desta linha de investigação e sublinha a importância dos estudos empíricos como a melhor forma de nos aproximarmos da complexidade relacional que está presente na «vida do laboratório». Originalidade/Valor. É uma análise sistemática da literatura relevante para o tema, onde se pretende construir um diálogo entre as dimensões teórica e empírica, a partir dos estudos que abordaram a relação entre as bibliotecas e a investigação científica.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Science Production and Dissemination, Academic libraries, Research libraries, Information Systems, Research Support Services
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DI. Science libraries.
Depositing user: Jorge Revez
Date deposited: 10 Jul 2018 18:46
Last modified: 10 Jul 2018 18:46
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/32963

References

Ambika, M., & Kannan, K. (2016). Information Use Pattern by Research Scholars in Electronic Environment: A Study at Select Universities in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Ad­vances in Library and Information Scien­ce, 53(1), 43-48. Obtido de http://jalis.in/pdf/5-1/Ambika.pdf

Anderson, R. (2011). The Crisis in Research Librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 289-290.

Anderson, R. (2015). A quiet culture war in research libraries – and what it means for librarians, researchers and publishers. Insights, 28(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.230

Berg, S. A., & Banks, M. (2016). Beyond Competencies: Naming Librarians’ Capacity for Research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.002

Bertalanffy, L. von. (2013). Teoria geral dos sistemas: fundamentos, desenvolvimento e aplicações (7.a ed.). Petrópolis: Vozes.

Björk, B.-C. (2007). A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information Research, 12(2), paper 307. Obtido de http://www.informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html

Bordieu, P. (1975). La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison. Sociologie et sociétés, 7(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.7202/001089ar

Borges, M. M. (2006). A esfera: Comunicação académica e novos media (Tese de Doutoramento). Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Letras, Coimbra. Obtido de http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8557

Borrego, Á., & Anglada, L. (2016). Faculty information behaviour in the electronic environment. New Library World, 117(3–4), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2015-0089

Brewerton, A. (2012). Re-Skilling for Research: Investigating the Needs of Researchers and How Library Staff Can Best Support Them. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2012.665718

Brown, J. M., & Tucker, C. (2013). Expanding Library Support of Faculty Research: Exploring Readiness. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 13(3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0019

Bueno de la Fuente, G. (2016a). Libraries: roles and opportunities on Open Science. Obtido 17 de Fevereiro de 2018, de https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/1426

Bueno de la Fuente, G. (2016b). What is Open Science? Introduction. Obtido 17 de Fevereiro de 2018, de https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/1420

Bush, V. (1945). Science: the endless frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Camón Luis, E., Rey Martín, C., & Balagué Mola, N. (2012). El apoyo a la investigación de las bibliotecas universitarias catalanas: estado actual. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, (29).

Caraça, J. (1993). Do saber ao fazer: porquê organizar a ciência. Lisboa: Gradiva.

Carlson, J., & Kneale, R. (2011). Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. College & Research Libraries News, 72(3), 167–170. Obtido de http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/3/167.short

Castells, M. (2007). A sociedade em rede (3a ed.). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Delserone, L. M., Kelly, J. A., & Kempf, J. L. (2010). Connecting Researchers with Funding Opportunities: a Joint Effort of the Libraries and the University Research Office. Collaborative Librarianship, 2(1), article 6. Obtido de http://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol2/iss1/6

European Commission. (2016). Guidelines on open access to scientific publications and research data in Horizon 2020 (Version 2.1). European Commission. Obtido de http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf

Falciani-White, N. (2016). Understanding the “Complexity of Experience”: Modeling Faculty Research Practices. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.003

Ford, N. (2015). Introduction to information behaviour. London: Facet.

Gómez Restrepo, A. M. (2012). Comportamiento en la búsqueda de información: el caso de los estudiantes de postgrado. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 35(2), 133–148. Obtido de http://ref.scielo.org/4wkwq3

González-Solar, L. (2016). La biblioteca universitaria orientada a la investigación: propuesta de un modelo de servicio centrado en el usuario desde la perspectiva del marketing (Tese de Doutoramento). Universidad da Coruña, Coruña. Obtido de http://hdl.handle.net/2183/17112

Grefsheim, S. F., & Rankin, J. A. (2007). Information needs and information seeking in a biomedical research setting: a study of scientists and science administrators. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 95(4), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.426

Haglund, L., & Olsson, P. (2008). The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: a multiple case study. The journal of academic librarianship, 34(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.010

Haines, L. L., Light, J., O’Malley, D., & Delwiche, F. A. (2010). Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 98(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019

Hemminger, B. M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K. T. L., & Adams, S. J. (2007). Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2205–2225. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20686

Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., & Wulfson, K. (2013a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2012. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Obtido de www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/us-faculty-survey-2012

Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., & Wulfson, K. (2013b). UK survey of academics 2012: Ithaka S+R|Jisc|RLUK. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Obtido de http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/UK_Survey_of_Academics_2012.pdf

Jamali, H. R., & Nicholas, D. (2010). Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists. Information Processing & Management, 46(2), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.12.010

Jesuíno, J. C. (Ed.). (1995). A comunidade científica portuguesa nos finais do século XX: comportamentos, atitudes e expectativas. Oeiras: Celta.

Johnson, L. M., Butler, J. T., & Johnston, L. R. (2012). Developing E-science and Research Services and Support at the University of Minnesota Health Sciences Libraries. Journal of library administration, 52(8), 10.1080/01930826.2012.751291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.751291

Kaye, J. (2014). User needs study for the Uniform Search Platform (USP). London: Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources (CLOSER), University of London, Institute of Education. Obtido de http://www.closer.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/CLOSER-Report-1-User-Needs-Study-USP.pdf

Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1982). Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science. Social Studies of Science, 12(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012001005

Kroll, S., & Forsman, R. (2010). A Slice of Research Life: Information Support for Research in the United States: Report commissioned by OCLC Research in support of the RLG Partnership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. Obtido de http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-15.pdf

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1997). A vida de laboratório: a produção de fatos científicos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.

Marques, A., & Marzal, M. Á. (2013). Estudo da análise comparativa das bibliotecas (universitárias) portuguesas no modelo CRAI, como fator de projeção na sua transformação e funções. Em Globalização, ciência, informação: atas (pp. 942–958).

Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.

Minie, M., Bowers, S., Tarczy-Hornoch, P., Roberts, E., James, R. A., Rambo, N., & Fuller, S. (2006). The University of Washington Health Sciences Library BioCommons: an evolving Northwest biomedical research information support infrastructure. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(3), 321–329. Obtido de ://WOS:000239470400013

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior. (2016). Ciência Aberta, Conhecimento para Todos: Princípios Orientadores. MCTES. Obtido de http://www.portugal.gov.pt/media/18506199/20160210-mctes-ciencia-aberta.pdf

Moedas, C. (2016). Open science: share and succeed. European Commission. Obtido de http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-1225_en.htm

Nicholas, D. (2016). Publish or perish thwarts young researchers’ urge to innovate. Research Europe, (440), 7–8. Obtido de http://ciber-research.eu/download/20161103-RE440.pdf

Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., … Świgoń, M. (2017). Where and how early career researchers find scholarly information. Learned Publishing, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1087

Niu, X., & Hemminger, B. M. (2011). A study of factors that affect the information‐seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21669

Niu, X., Hemminger, B. M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., … Cataldo, T. (2010). National Study of Information Seeking Behavior of Academic Researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21307

Observatório de Ciência da Informação da Universidade do Porto. (sem data). DeltCI - Dicionário Eletrónico de Terminologia em Ciência da Informação. Obtido 17 de Fevereiro de 2018, de https://paginas.fe.up.pt/~lci/index.php/1648-investigar/deltci-dicionario-eletronico-terminologia-ci

OCDE. (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. Paris: OECD Publishing. Obtido de http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en

Open Science and Research Initiative. (2014). Open Science and Research Handbook. Obtido de https://avointiede.fi/documents/14273/0/Open+Science+and+Research+Handbook+v.1.0/50316d5d-440b-4496-b039-2997663afff8

Pereira, J. P. (2016, Dezembro 31). A ascensão da nova ignorância. Público, p. 44.

Pinto, M., & Fernández-Ramos, A. (2010). Spanish Faculty Preferences and Usage of Library Services in the Field of Science and Technology. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 10(2), 215–239. Obtido de https://muse.jhu.edu/article/378048

Plutchak, T. S. (2016). A Librarian Out Of The Library. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1106

REBIUN. (2011). III Plan Estrategico de REBIUN 2020. [Espanha]: Conferencia de Rectores de Universidades Españolas. Obtido de http://www.rebiun.org/queesrebiun/Documents/III_Plan%20Estrategico_REBIUN.pdf

Research Information Network. (2010). Research support services in UK universities. Research Information Network. Obtido de https://www.soas.ac.uk/careers/earlycareerresearchers/file69090.pdf

Research Information Network. (2011). The Value of libraries for research and researchers: a RIN and RLUK report. London: RIN. Obtido de http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/value_of_libraries_for_screen_1.pdf

Research Information Network, & British Library. (2009). Patterns of information use and exchange: case studies of researchers in the life sciences. London: RIN. Obtido de http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Patterns_information_use-REPORT_Nov09.pdf

Research Information Network, & Consortium of Research Libraries. (2007). Researchers’ use of academic libraries and their services. Obtido de http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Researchers-libraries-services-report.pdf

Santos, F. B. dos, & Martins, M. F. da S. (2016). Comportamento informacional de profissionais da área de meteorologia do Brasil e de Portugal: um estudo exploratório. Páginas a&b, 3(especial), 73–86. Obtido de http://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/paginasaeb/article/view/1452

Sanz Casado, E. (1994). Manual de estudios de usuarios. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez.

Spezi, V. (2016). Is Information-Seeking Behavior of Doctoral Students Changing?: A Review of the Literature (2010–2015). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1127831

Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 143–159.

Talja, S., Vakkari, P., Fry, J., & Wouters, P. (2007). Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1674–1685. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20650

Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Christian, L., & Volentine, R. (2015). Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150203

Tovar-Sanz, M. R. (2015). El apoyo a la investigación en las bibliotecas universitarias españolas. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información, 38, 311–326. Obtido de http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DCIN/article/view/50822/47169

University College London (UCL) CIBER group. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. London: University College London. Obtido de http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/ programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf

University of Minnesota Libraries. (2006). A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Academic Support: A Final Report. University of Minnesota Libraries. Obtido de http://hdl.handle.net/11299/5540

Valero Rivero, D., Molina, M. P., & Ponjuán Dante, G. (2014). Comportamiento informacional en una comunidad científica formada a partir de la implementación de proyectos colaborativos institucionales. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 19(4), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2032

Vaughan, K. T. L., Hayes, B. E., Lerner, R. C., McElfresh, K. R., Pavlech, L., Romito, D., … Morris, E. N. (2013). Development of the research lifecycle model for library services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.013

Wilson, L. R. (1933). The Service of Libraries in Promoting Scholarship and Research. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 3(2), 127–145. Obtido de http://www.jstor.org/stable/4301964

Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of documentation, 55(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007145

Wolff, C., Rod, A. B., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2016a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2015. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Obtido de http://sr.ithaka.org/?p=277685

Wolff, C., Rod, A. B., & Schonfeld, R. C. (2016b). UK survey of academics 2015: Ithaka S+R|Jisc|RLUK. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R. Obtido de http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/uk-survey-of-academics-2015/


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS