Evolución de repositorios temáticos y megarrevistas: visión 2018

Binfield, Peter (2014). “Novel scholarly journal concepts”. En: Bartling, Sönke; Friesike, Sascha (ed.). Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, pp. 155-163. ISBN: 978 3 319 00026 8

http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

Björk, Bo-Christer (2018). “Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017”, PeerJ 6: e4357.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4357

Borrego, Ángel (2017), “Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 3, pp. 185–192.

https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099

Davis, Phil (2017a). “Scientific reports overtakes PLOS One as largest megajournal”. The scholarly kitchen, 6 abril. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/04/06/scientific-reports-overtakes-plos-one-as-largest-megajournal

Davis, Phil (2017b). “PLOS reports $1.7M loss In 2016”. The scholarly kitchen, 27 noviembre.

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/11/27/plos-reports-2016-financial-loss

Ellers, Jacintha; Crowther, Thomas W.; Harvey, Jeffrey A. (2017). “Gold open access publishing in mega-journals: Developing countries pay the price of western premium academic output” Journal of scholarly publishing, v. 49, n. 1, pp. 89-102.

https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.1.89

Hathcock, April (2017). “Open access week 2017: Launch of LIS scholarship archive”. At the intersection, 23 octubre.

https://aprilhathcock.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/open-access-week-2017-launch-of-lis-scholarship-archive

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2012). “Física vs química: dos modelos de publicación científica”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 167-172.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.07

Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre (2017). “Evolución de repositorios temáticos y megarrevistas: visión 2017”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 11, pp. 242-246.

https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.44

Melero, Remedios (2018). “Evolució i nova generació dels repositoris”. Blok de BiD, 28 febrero.

http://www.ub.edu/blokdebid/ca/node/850

Shin, Eun-Ja (2017). “Can the growth of mega-journals affect authors’ choice of journal?”. Serials review, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 137-146.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1313092

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willet, Peter (2017). “Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review”. Journal of documentation, v. 73, n. 2, pp. 263-283.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082

Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire; Willet, Peter (2018). “‘Let the community decide?’ The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals”. Journal of documentation, v. 74, n. 1, pp.137-161.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092

Villatoro, Francisco (2018). “Scientific Reports ya es la mayor megarrevista científica superando a PLoS One”. La ciencia de la mula Francis, 19 febrero.

http://francis.naukas.com/2018/02/19/scientific-reports-supera-a-plos-one-en-2017-siendo-la-mayor-megarrevista-cientifica/

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017a). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)”. Learned publishing, v. 30, pp. 301–311.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1117/epdf

Wakeling, Simon; Spezi, Valerie; Fry, Jenny; Creaser, Claire;; Pinfield, Stephen; Willet, Peter (2017b). “Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities)”. Learned publishing , v. 30, pp. 313–322.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1118/epdf