Predatory Open Access journals: A review of past screenings within the Flemish performance based research funding system (2014 – 2018)

Beall, J. (2010). “Predatory” open-access scholarly publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10-17.

Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–279.

Bloudoff-Indelicato, M. (2015). Backlash after Frontiers journals added to list of questionable publishers. Nature, 526, 613.

Clark, J., & Smith, R. (2015). Firm action needed on predatory journals. British Medical Journal, 350, h210. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h210 804

Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2

Eysenbach, G. (2008). Black sheep among Open Access Journals and Publishers. Retrieved from http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.be/2008/03/black-sheep-among-open-access-journals.html

Eykens, J., Guns, R., & Engels, T. C. E. (2018). Comparing VABB-SHW (version VIII) with Cabells Journal Blacklist and Directory of Open Access Journals: report to the Authoritative Panel. http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1481030151162165141

Kolata, G. (2013). Scientific articles accepted (Personal checks, too). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html

Manca, A., Martinez, G., Cugusi, L., Dragone, D., Dvir, Z., & Deriu, F. (2017). The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology. Neuroscience, 353, 166-173.

Mimouni, M., Braun, E., Mimouni, F. B., Mimouni, D., & Blumenthal, E. Z. (2017). Beall's List Removed: What Stands Between Us and Open Access Predators?. The American journal of medicine, 130(8), e371-e372.

Moher, D., & Srivastava, A. (2015). You are invited to submit... . BMC Medicine, 13(1), 180-184.

Rahman, A. I. M.J, Dexters, N. & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Predatory Open Access Journals in a Performance-Based Funding Model: Common Journals in Bealls List and in the VABB-SHW. http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1139870151162165141

Rahman, A. I. M.J, & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Predatory open access journals in a performance-based funding model: common journals in Bealls list and in version V of the VABB-SHW. http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1233590151162165141

Rahman, A. I. M.J, Guns, R. & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Predatory open access journals in a performance-based funding model: a comparison of journals in version VI of the VABB-SHW with Bealls list and DOAJ. http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1300570151162165141

OECD (2007). Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati manual. Paris: Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Shen, C. & Björk, B. (2015). ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13(230), doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469.

Sīle, L., Guns, R. & Engels, T. C. E. (2017). Comparing VABB-SHW (version VII) with Beall's lists and DOAJ. http://hdl.handle.net/10067/1396540151162165141

Silver, A.J. (2017). Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21328 805

Swauger, S. (2017). Open Access, Power, and privilege: A response to “what I learned from predatory publishing”. https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/16837

Verleysen, F.T., Ghesquière, P., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW). In W. Blockmans et al. (Eds.), Bibliometrics: use and abuse in the review of research performance (pp. 117–127). London: Portland Press