Toward a taxonomy of newspaper information quality: An experimental model and test applied to Venezuela dimensions found in information quality

ROMERO-RODRIGUEZ, L.M and AGUADED, I Toward a taxonomy of newspaper information quality: An experimental model and test applied to Venezuela dimensions found in information quality. JOURNALISM, 2016, vol. 18, n. 1, pp. 1-19. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (103kB) | Preview

English abstract

The quality of information from communication media is a topic that has been dealt with by various theorists through the analysis of the final products of information. This research work offers an analysis model of the quality of information of printed news media by the use of three indexes of categories and structured dimensions that will allow for the assessment and evaluation of the quality of information from the media, and the identification of the incidence of political-economic conditions of the journalistic environment’s macro-environment. For this, an experimental test of two Venezuelan media outlets was performed. Their use allowed us to conclude that political polarization and discourse of social confrontation, as well as economic factors such as inflation and pay scales had a proportionally direct effect on the quality of information products.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: information quality, mass media, newspaper, press, print media
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
H. Information sources, supports, channels.
Depositing user: Dr. Ignacio Aguaded
Date deposited: 02 Oct 2018 23:52
Last modified: 02 Oct 2018 23:56


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Alessandri F, Edwards C, Pellegrini S, et al. (2001) VAP: Un sistema métrico de la calidad peri-odística.

Cuadernos de Información 14: 112–120.

Romero-Rodríguez and Aguaded

American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) (1998)

Examining Our Credibility, Why Newspaper Credibility Has Been Dropping?

Columbia, MO: ASNE.

Arnold K (2009)

Qualitaetsjournalismus: Die Zeitung und ihr Publikum

. Konstanz: UVK.

Arráez R (1998) La comunicación para el desarrollo. Su aplicación para el medio radio. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 9(1). Available at:

Barnhurst KG (2013) Newspaper’s experiment online: Story content after a decade on the web. Journalism 14(1): 3–21. Available at:

Bird SE (2010) News practices in everyday life: Beyond audience response. In: Allan S (ed.)

The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism. London: Routledge, pp. 417–427.

Clayton M (2006) Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education.

Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational


17(4): 373–386. Available at:

Costera-Meijer I (2012) Valuable journalism: A search for quality from the vantage point of the user. Journalism 14(6): 754–760. Available at:

De-Pablos JM and Mateos C (2004) Estrategias informativas para acceder a un periodismo de calidad en prensa y TV: Patologías y tabla de medicación para recuperar la calidad en prensa. Ámbitos 11–12: 341–365.

Fortunati L, Sarrica M, O’Sullivan J, et al. (2009) The influence of the internet on European journalism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

14(4): 928–963. Available at:

Gieber W (1964) News is what papermen make it. In: Dexter LA and Manning D (eds) White, People, Society and Mass Communications

. New York: Free Press, pp. 173–178.

Gordon TJ (1994) The Delphi Method. Washington, DC: American Council for the United Nations University.

Hagen L (1995) Informationsqualität von Nachrichten. Meßmethoden und ihre Anwendung auf die Dienste von Nachrichtenagenturen. Opladen: Westdeutscher.

Hagen L and Beren H (1997) Relevanz von Nachrichten. Messmethoden für ein zentrales Qualitätskriterium und ihre Anwendung auf Dienste von Nachrichtenagenturen. Rundfunk und Fernsehen 43: 158–178.

Halloran J, Elliot P and Murdock G (1970)

Demonstrations and Communication: A Case of Study. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Kirk J and Miller ML (1986) Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

Lang K and Lang G (1953) The unique perspective of television and its effect: A pilot study. American Sociological Review 18: 2–12.

Leggatt T (1996) Identifying the indefinable: An essay on approaches to assessing quality in the UK. In: Ishikawa S (ed.) Quality Assessment of Television. Luton: John Libbey Media, pp. 73–87

Linstone HA and Turoff M (2002) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

McQuail D (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest

. London: SAGE.Madianou M (2010) Living with news: Ethnographies of news consumption. In: Allan S (ed.) The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism

. London: Routledge, pp. 428–438.

Martin VB (2008) Attending the news: A grounded theory about a daily regimen.

Journalism 9(1): 76–94. Available at:

Meyer P (1987) Ethical Journalism. New York: Longman.

Okoli C and Pawlowski S (2004) The Delphi Method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management

42: 15–29. Available at: Journalism 18(10)

Pellegrini S and Mujica MC (2006) Valor Agregado Periodístico (VAP): La calidad periodística como un factor productive en un entorno medial complejo.

Palabra Clave 1: 11–28.

Pew Research Center (1999) Striking the Balance, Audience Interests, Business Pressures and Journalists’ Values. Available at:

Picard RG (2004) Commercialism and newspaper quality. Newspaper Research Journal 25(1): 54–66.

Poettker H (2000) Kompensation von Komplexitaet: Journalismustheorie als Begruendung journalistischer Qualitaetsmaßstaebe. In: Loeffelholz M (ed.)

Theorien des Journalismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 375–390.

Reguant-Álvarez M and Torrado-Fonseca M (2016) El método Delphi. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació 9(1): 87–102. Available at: ttp://

Reporters Without Borders (2014) World Press Freedom Index 2014. Available at:

Riffe D, Aust CH and Lacy R (1993) Effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly

70(1): 133–139. Available at:íguez LM (2014)

Pragmática de la desinformación: Estratagemas e incidencia de la calidad informativa de los medios. Huelva: Repositorio Institucional Arias Montano. Available at: Rosengren KE (1979) Bias in news: Methods and concepts. Studies of Broadcasting 15: 31–45.

Rosengren KE, Carlsson M and Tagerud Y (1996) Quality in programming: Views from north. In: Ishikawa S (ed.) Quality Assessment of Television.

Luton: John Libbey Media, pp. 3–48.

Sampieri RH, Collado CF, Lucio PB, et al. (1998) Metodología de la investigación

. México, DF: McGraw-Hill.

Schatz H and Schulz W (1992) Qualitaet von Fernsehprogrammen: Kriterien und Methoden zur Beurteilung von Programmqualitaet im dualen Fernsehsystem.

Media Perspektiven 11: 690–712.

Searle JR (1997) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

Shoemaker PJ (2006) News and newsworthiness: A commentary. Communications

31: 105–111. Available at:

Shoemaker PJ and Cohen AA (2006) News around the World: Practitioners, Content and the Public. Oxford: Routledge.

Shultz W (2000) Preconditions of journalistic quality in an open society. In: Proceedings of international conference news media and politics: Independent journalism, Budapest,6–7 October 2000.

Singer JB (2003) Who are these Guys? The Online Challenge to the Notion of Journalistic Professionalism. Journalism 4(2): 139–163. Available at:

Singer JB (2005) The political j-blogger: ‘Normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism 6(2): 173–198. Available at:

Stempel GH (1989) Content analysis. In: Stempel GH and Westley BH (eds)

Research Methods in Mass Communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 375–387.

Urban J and Schweiger W (2014) News quality from the recipients’ perspective. Journalism Studies 15(6): 821–840. Available at:

van der Wurf R and Schönbach K (2011) Between profession and audience: codes of conduct and transparency as quality instruments for off- and online journalism.

Journalism Studies 12(4): 407–402. Available at:

Wallisch G (1995) Journalistische Qualitaet: Definitionen – Modelle – Kritik

. Konstanz: UVK.

Watzlawick P (1976) How Real Is Real. New York: Random House.Romero-Rodríguez and Aguaded

Wyss V (2000) Online-Journalismus in Europa: das Beispiel Schweiz. In: Altmeppen K-D, Bucher H-J and Löffelholz M (eds) Online-Journalismus: Perspektiven fu ̈r Wissenschaft und Praxis. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 335–346.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item