Marca personal en entornos académicos: una perspectiva institucional = Personal branding in academic environments: an institutional perspective

González-Solar, Llarina Marca personal en entornos académicos: una perspectiva institucional = Personal branding in academic environments: an institutional perspective. Anales De Documentación, 2018, vol. 21, n. 2, pp. 1-15. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of GonzalezSolar_2018_Marca_Personal.pdf]
Preview
Text
GonzalezSolar_2018_Marca_Personal.pdf

Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

This study addresses the concepts of reputation and personal branding and how they fit into academic environments. A roadmap model for the build-up researchers’ personal brands is proposed as a methodological guide, which underlines the eed of reflection and definition of goals prior to take part in relationship environments, both online and offline. The specific characteristics of academic digital ecosystems, their relations with personal brands and their consequences are explored in depth. As a conclusion, reflections are made on the role that universities and, within them, libraries can play in creating personal brands as key for managing their own institutional reputation.

Spanish abstract

En este estudio se abordan los conceptos de reputación y marca personal y su encaje en entornos académicos. Se propone un modelo de actuación para la construcción de marcas personales de investigadores, como guía metodológica que subraya la necesidad de reflexión y de definición de objetivos ante la participación en entornos de relación, tanto online como offline. Se rofundiza en las características específicas de los ecosistemas digitales académicos, en relación con la creación de marcas personales y sus consecuencias. Finalmente, se reflexiona sobre el papel que las universidades y, dentro de ellas, las bibliotecas pueden tener en la creación de marcas personales como fórmula para actuar sobre su propia reputación institucional.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Personal branding; academic reputation; scientific communication; social media; university marketing; research support services; university libraries
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
C. Users, literacy and reading.
F. Management.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Llarina Gonzalez-Solar
Date deposited: 25 Oct 2018 17:39
Last modified: 25 Oct 2018 17:39
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33624

References

ALMOUSA, O. Users’ classification and usage-pattern identification in academic social networks. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies. 2011. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1109/aeect.2011.6132525

ALONSO-ARÉVALO, J. Alfabetización en comunicación científica: acreditación, OA, redes sociales, altmetrics, bibliotecarios incrustados y gestión de la identidad digital. En: Alfabetización informacional: reflexiones y experiencias. 2014. Disponible en:

http://hdl.handle.net/10760/22838

BECHER, T. y TROWLER, P.R. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. 2ª ed. Philadelphia: SRHE, Open University Press, 2001. ISBN 033520628X

BIK, H.M. y GOLDSTEIN, M.C. An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biology, 2013, vol. 11, nº 4, e1001535. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535

BROWN, E. y WOOLSTON, C. Life in the old blog yet: blogging is still a top way to communicate science to a broad readership, researchers say. Nature, 2018, vol. 554, nº 7690, p. 135-137. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-01414-6

BROWN, R. Reputation management. Business Information Review, 2010, vol. 27, nº 1, p. 56-64. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266382109357390

CAMPOS-FREIRE, F. y RÚAS-ARAÚJO, J. Uso de las redes sociales digitales profesionales y científicas: el caso de las 3 universidades gallegas. El profesional de la información, 2016, vol. 25, nº 3, p. 431-440. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.may.13

CASTELLS, M. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 2007, vol. 1, p. 238-266. Disponible en:

http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46

CLIMENT-RODRIGUEZ, J.A. y NAVARRO-ABAL, Y. Branding y reputación: pilares básicos de la visibilidad online del profesor de educación superior. Revista iberoamericana de educación superior, 2017, vol. 8, nº 21, p. 66-76. Disponible en:

http://ref.scielo.org/h2nc8c

CROUZIER, T. Science ecosystem 2.0: how will change occur? 2015 [en línea]. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.2777/67279

DE-CASTRO, P. Implantación institucional del identificador ORCID: un nuevo rol para las bibliotecas universitarias. Anuario ThinkEPI, 2015, vol. 9, p. 132-134. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2015.31

ELSAYED, A.M. The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: a survey. Social Science Computer Review, 2016, vol. 34, nº 3, p. 378-391. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315589146

FERNÁNDEZ-MARCIAL, V. Marketing mix de servicios de información: valor e importancia de la P de producto. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 2015, vol. 11, p. 64-78. Disponible en:

http://revistas.bnjm.cu/index.php/anales/article/view/4380

FERNÁNDEZ-MARCIAL, V. y GONZÁLEZ-SOLAR, L. Promoción de la investigación e identidad digital: el caso de la Universidade da Coruña. El profesional de la información, 2015, vol. 24, nº. 5, p. 656-664. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.sep.14

GALL, D. Librarian like a rock star: using your personal brand to promote your services and reach distant users. Journal of Library Administration, 2012, vol. 52, nº 6-7, p. 549-558. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.707952

GONZÁLEZ-SOLAR, L. La biblioteca universitaria orientada a la investigación: propuesta de un modelo de servicio centrado en el usuario desde la perspectiva del marketing [tesis en línea], 2016. Disponible en:

http://hdl.handle.net/2183/17112

GREIFENEDER, E. et al. Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites. Journal of documentation, 2018, vol. 74, nº 1, p. 119-136. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2017-0051

HAAK, L.L. Persistent identifiers can improve provenance and attribution and encourage sharing of research results. Information Services & Use, 2014, vol. 34, nº 1-2, p. 93-96. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/isu-140736

JENG, W.; HE, D. y JIANG, J. User participation in an academic social networking service: a survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 66, nº 5, p. 890-904. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23225

JORDAN, K. Academics and their online networks: exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 2014, vol. 19, nº 11. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.4937

KRAMER, B. y BOSMAN, J. Innovations in scholarly communication: global survey on research tool usage. F1000Research, 2016, vol. 5, p. 692. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8414.1

LAIR, D.J.; SULLIVAN, K. y CHENEY, G. Marketization and the recasting of the professional self: The rhetoric and ethics of personal branding. Management Communication Quarterly, 2005, vol. 18, nº 3, p. 307-343. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904270744

LABRECQUE, L.I.; MARKOS, E. y MILNE, G.R. Online personal branding: processes, challenges, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2011, vol. 25, nº 1, p. 37-50. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.002

LOWENTHAL, P.R.; DUNLAP, J.C. y STITSON, P. Creating an intentional web presence: strategies for every educational technology professional. TechTrends, 2016, vol. 60, p. 320-329. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0056-1

LUPTON, D. Feeling better connected’: academics’ use of social media. Canberra: University of Canberra, 2014 [en línea]. Disponible en:

http://apo.org.au/system/files/53908/apo-nid53908-48756.pdf

MARAURI-CASTILLO, Í.; CANTALAPIEDRA-GONZÁLEZ, M.-J. y ÁLVAREZ-FERNÁNDEZ, C. Blog y Twitter, la combinación perfecta del comunicador digital: los casos de Escolar.net, El comidista y Mi mesa cojea. El profesional de la información, 2018, vol. 27, nº 2, p. 349-358. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.13

MARTIN-MARTIN, A.; ORDUÑA-MALEA, E.; HARZING, A.-W. y DELGADO LÓPEZ-CÓZAR, E. Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? Journal of Informetrics, 2017, vol. 11, nº 1, p. 152-163. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.008

MARWICK, A.E. y BOYD, D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 2010, vol. 13, nº 1, p. 114-133. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

MATTHEWS, D. Scholars launch non-profit rival to ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Times Higher Education, 2017 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/scholars-form-non-profit-rival-to-researchgate

NÁNDEZ, G. y BORREGO, A. Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study. Electronic Library, 2013, vol. 31, nº 6, p. 781-791. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1108/el-03-2012-0031

NATURE RESEARCH. Springer Nature 2017 Social Media Survey: Data. [en línea]. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5028212.v1

NICHOLAS, D. et al. New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 2015, vol. 28, nº 3, p. 169-183. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1087/20150303

NICHOLAS, D.; HERMAN, E. y JAMALI, H.R. Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars [en línea]. 2015. Disponible en:

http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94955/jrc94955.pdf

OPEN SCIENCE SKILLS WORKING GROUP. Providing researchers with the skills and competencies they need to practice open science. 2017 [en línea]. Disponible en: https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_skills_wgreport_final.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none

ORTEGA, J.L. y AGUILLO, I.F. Microsoft academic search and Google Scholar citations: a comparative analysis of author profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 6, nº 6, p. 1149-1156.

Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23036

ORTEGA, J.L. Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 2015, vol. 39, nº 4, p. 520-536. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-03-2015-0093

ORTEGA, J.L. Redes sociales académicas: ¿espacios colaborativos o clubes Diógenes? Anuario ThinkEPI, 2017a, vol. 11, p. 225-229. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.42

ORTEGA, J.L. Toward a homogenization of academic social sites: A longitudinal study of profiles in Academia.edu, Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate. Online Information Review, 2017b, vol. 41, nº 6, p. 812-825. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2016-0012

RANGARAJAN, D.; GELB, B.D. y VANDAVEER, A. Strategic personal branding: and how it pays off. Business Horizons, 2017, vol. 60, nº 5, p. 657-666. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.009

ROTENBERG, E. y KUSHMERICK, A. The author challenge: identification of self in the scholarly literature. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 2011, vol. 49, nº 6, p. 503-520. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.606405

SCHAWBEL, D. Me 2.0: Build a Powerful Brand to Achieve Career Success. New York: Kaplan, 2009.

SHANKS, J. y ARLITSCH, K. Making Sense of Researcher Services. Journal of Library Administration, 2016, vol. 56, nº 3, p. 295-316. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2016.1146534

SMITH, D.R. Are you failing at scientific social media? EMBO reports, 2015, vol. 17, nº 2, p. 123-124. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541782

SMITH-YOSHIMURA, K. et al. Registering researchers in authority files. Ohio: OCLC Research, 2014. Disponible en:

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED564924.pdf

SOLOVE, D.J. The future of reputation: gossip, rumor, and privacy on the Internet. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

STEWART, B. Open to influence: what counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media and Technology, 2015, vol. 40, nº 3, p. 287-309. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547

THELWALL, M. y KOUSHA, K. Academia.edu: social network or academic network? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, vol. 65, nº 4, p. 721-731. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038

THELWALL, M. y KOUSHA, K. ResearchGate articles: age, discipline, audience size and impact, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, vol. 68, nº 2, p. 468-479. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23675

VAN NOORDEN, R. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network. Nature, 2014, vol. 512, nº 7513, p. 126-129. Disponible en:

https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a

WELLER, M. The digital scholar: how technology is transforming academic practice. London: A&C Black, 2011. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849666275

WELLER, M. Digital Scholarship and the Tenure Process as an Indicator of Change in Universities. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 2012, vol. 9, nº 2. Disponible en:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1398

WOODSIDE, A.G. Brand-consumer storytelling theory and research. Psychology and Marketing, 2010, vol. 27, nº 6, p. 531-540.

Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20342


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item