Evaluation of authorship patterns in Iranian articles and its relation to citations

Moradi, Nasrin and Saboury, Ali Akbar and Noruzi, Alireza Evaluation of authorship patterns in Iranian articles and its relation to citations. Caspian Journal of Scientometric, 2018, vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 37-44. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
authorship.patterns.pdf

Download (706kB) | Preview

English abstract

Background and aim: Scientific collaborations increase citations and its results in the others' research. This aim of this study was to determine the number of authors in different majors of humanities, basic sciences and arts and the relationship between the number of authors and number of citations on Iranian articles indexed in the Web of Science. Material and methods: The present study was conducted using descriptive and analytical methods through scientometric methods. The research population was all articles published by Iranian researchers on the topics of basic sciences, humanities and art, indexed in the Web of Science in 2012, which were 17671 documents. The number of citations of articles has been recorded by May 2016. The year of 2016 was selected for the articles in the various categories would have enough time to get the citation. Data were collected via referring to articles in each field, counting the number of authors in each article and the number of citations received each article until May 2016. Bib Excel, Excel, and SPP softwares were used to analyzed the data. Findings: This research has shown that the largest share of research collaboration in Iran is in a group of two to five people. Moreover, there was a relationship and correlation between the number of authors and the number of citations in different majors. Conclusion: Among the examined categories, the field of medicine had the highest correlation coefficient between the number of authors and the number of citations, and archeology had the lowest correlation.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientific collaboration, Co-authorship, Web of science, Number of authors, Number of citations, Iran
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 29 Nov 2018 12:28
Last modified: 29 Nov 2018 12:28
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33736

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Abramo G, D’Angelo CA. The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics. 2015; 9(4): 746-61.

Ahmadi H, Salami A, Fathi L. Citation Analysis and the Relation of Co-authorship in the Journal of Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature (Case Journals No. 1-20). Journal of Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature, 2014; 9: 149-70.

Bornmann L. Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017; 68(4): 1036-47.

Danesh F, Abdulmajid AH, Afshar M, Mousavifar S, Farhadi F. Correlation between Scientific Output and Collaboration among LIS Scholars around the World [as Reflected in Emerald Database]. Journal of Information Processing and Management. [Research]. 2009; 25(1): 5-22.

Engels TC, Dexters N, Houben B, editors. Correlations of Assessments of Research Group Quality and Productivity with Group Size, Output Numbers and Normalized Impact. Proceedings of the 17th Science and Technology Indicators Conference; 2012: STI Montréal. Available at: https://www.ecoom.be/en/node/369

Figg WD, Dunn L, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Thurman PW, Barrett JC, et al. Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2006; 26(6): 759-67.

Hariri N, Nikzad M. Co-authorship networks of Iranian articles in library and information science, psychology, management and economics in ISI during 2000- 2009. Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 2011; 26: 825-44.

Hasan Zadeh M, Baghaee S, noroozi Chakoli A. Relationship between co-author and number of citations in Iranian articles indexed on Web of science 1989-2005. Strategy for Culture, 2008; 2: 65-84.

Kenna R, Berche B. Critical mass and the dependency of research quality on group size. Scientometrics, 2011; 86(2): 527-40.

Noroozi Chakoli A. Introduction to Scientometric (Fondations, Concepts, Relations & Origins). Tehran: Organization for researching and composing university textbooks in humanities (SAMT); 2013.

Noruzi, A., & Velayati, K. (2009). Scientific Research Collaboration: Sociology of Scientific Collaboration. Tehran: Chapar.

Osareh F. Scientific research collaboration: sociology of scientific collaboration. Ketabe Mah - Koliat. 2009; 12(11): 21-3. Available at: http://www.ensani.ir/fa/content/203169/default.aspx

Pirhaghghi M, Saboury AA. A review of Critical masses for research groups in Iran. Nesha e Elm. 2014; 5(1): 6-11. Available at: http://www.sciencecultivation.ir/far/pdf/sc09/9-1.pdf

Rahimi M, Fattahi R. Scientific collaboration and information production: A look at the concepts and patterns common in scientific production. National Library Studies and Organize information. 2007; 18(3): 235-48. Available at: http://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_435.html

Sharif Moghaddam H, Zaiee S, Salami M, Alijani R. A Review of Authorship Patterns and Citation Rates of Iranian Researchers’ Articles in the Field of Surgery According to the Data from the ISI Database. Iranian Journal of Surgery, 2015; 23(2): 66-74. Available at: http://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=305840

So M, Kim J, Choi S, Park HW. Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: focused on non- quality factors. Quality & Quantity, 2015; 49: 1513-30.

Tahmtan I, Afshar AS, Ahmadzadeh k. Factors affecting number of citations: a compehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 2016; 107: 1195-225.

Wallmark J, Holmqvist H, Eckerstein S, Langered B. The increase in efficiency with size of research teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1973(3): 80-6. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6448434/


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item