Indexing Profile of English-Language Journals of the University of Tehran Based on Indexing Criteria of International Citation Databases

Noruzi, Alireza and Solhjoo, Niloofar Indexing Profile of English-Language Journals of the University of Tehran Based on Indexing Criteria of International Citation Databases. Library and Information Sciences, 2016, vol. 19, n. 2, pp. 44-78. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (12MB) | Preview

English abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the feasibility and possibility of indexing English-language journals published by the University of Tehran in international citation indexes (e.g. Web of Science and Scopus). It would also help to find out the reasons why the majority of these journals are not yet indexed in international citation indexes. This study also provides some strategies to increase the international visibility and accessibility of these journals. Materials and Methods: This descriptive survey examined English-language journals published by Scientific Journals Database of Tehran University, available at We have used a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures such as journal citation analysis and a checklist. Citation analysis data was collected from Scopus and Google Scholar, and the checklist was designed upon indexing criteria of Web of Science Core Collection Journal Selection Process and Scopus Content Advisory Board. Results: Findings indicate that the total number of citations per journal was low and therefore only 15 percent of these journals were indexed in international databases and there were only two journals comply with all of the minimum acceptance criteria. Some reasons why they are not yet indexed by international citation databases are the irregularity in publishing, lack of description of the peer-review process and lack of publication ethics and malpractice statement. However, the strong points of these journals are proper publication archive, accessibility, and readability of the content to international readerships. Conclusion: This study helps publishers, editors and decision-makers to improve the quality of international journals and give them the rank and the position of being welcomed by a wider scholar community and accepted by international citation databases.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientific journal, Peer-reviewed journal, Citation indexing, Indexing and abstracting, Scopus, Web of Science, University of Tehran
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
Depositing user: Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2018 14:57
Last modified: 22 Jun 2019 19:20


Aghaei Chadegani, A., H. Salehi, M. M. Yunus, H. Farhadi, M. Fooladi, M. Farhadi, & N. Ale Ebrahimi. 2013. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, 9 (5), 18-26.

Balhara, Yatan Pal Singh. 2012. Indexed journal: What does it mean?. Lung India, 29(2), 193.

Brown, Tracey. 2004. Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas. London: Sense About Science.

Burnham, Judy F. 2006. Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3 (1), 1–8.

Devassy Bino, P. G., S. Subash, and A. Ramanathan. 2005. Concentration in knowledge output: A case of economics journals. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 2(2), 261-279

Duncombe, Derrick. 2015. How to add local journals to international databases. The 2nd Asian Science Editors’ Conference & Workshop. August 2015. Hanoi, Vietnam.

Ellison, G. 2002. The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 947-993.

Falagas, M., V. Kouranos, R. Arencibia-Jorge, & D. Karageorgopoulos. 2008. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB Journal, 22(8), 2623-2628.

Fingerman, Susan. (2006). Web of Science and Scopus: Current features and capabilities. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from

Freda, M., & L. Nicholl. 2009. Getting your journal indexed and using resources for editors. In Editor’s Handbook: An online resource and CE course (pp. 1-11). Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins.

Garfield, E. 1979. Citation Indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Gasparyan, A.Y. 2012. Bibliographic databases: Some critical points. European Science Editing, 38(4), 86-87.

Gasparyan, AY, L. Ayvazyan, SV. Gorin, and GD. Kitas. 2014. Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals. Croat Med J 55 (3): 271-80.

Google Scholar. 2016. Inclusion Guidelines for Webmasters. September 20, 2016, from

Guerrero-Botea, V., & F. Moya-Anegónb. 2012. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674-688.

Harzing, A.W. (2007) Publish or Perish, available from

Harzing, A.W.; Wal, R. van der. 2008. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis?. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61-73.

Hirsch, Jorge E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (46), 16569–16572.

Holland, K., D. Duncombe, E. Dyas, & W. Meester. 2014, September. Scopus Journal FAQs: Helping to improve the submission & success process for Editors & Publishers. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from

Kim, H. 2015. How to index journal in Scopus & WoS. The 2nd Asian Science Editors’ Conference & Workshop. August 2015, Hanoi, Vietnam. April 20, 2016, from

Kulkarni, A. V., B. Aziz, I. Shams, J. W. Busse. 2009. Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302 (10), 1092-1096.

Lin, Z., S. Hou, & J. Wu. 2016. The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1457-1464.

Meester, W. 2016, February 18. Why Scopus content is relevant to you [Webinar]. In Scopus webinar series. April 20, 2016, from

Meho, L.I., & Yang, K. 2007. A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

Najari, A., & M. Yousefvand. 2013. Scientometrics Study of Impact of Journal Indexing on the Growth of Scientific Productions of Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42 (10), 1134-1138.

Nieminen, P, et al. 2006. The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6: 42.

Noruzi, A., & Abdekhoda, H. 2011. How to get Iranian journals better indexed by foreign databases? Journal of Health Information Management, 8(4), 1-12. April 20, 2016, from

Ramin, S., & A. Sarraf Shirazi. 2012. Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nuclear Medicine Review, 15 (2), 132-136.

Rew, D., & K. Holland. 2012, Augest. Advice to journal editors and publishers: Securing accession for a journal to Scopus. April 20, 2016, from

Rew, D. 2015, December. An Introduction to the Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board (CSAB). April 20, 2016, from

Salamat, F, A. R Sobhani and M. Mallaei. 2013. Quality of publication ethics in the instructions to the authors of Iranian journals of medical sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Science, 38: 57–61.

Taskin, Z., G. Doğan, S. Akça, I. Şencan, & M. Akbulut. 2015. Does Scopus put its own journal selection criteria into practice? In Salah, A.A., Y. Tonta, A.A. Akdag Salah, C. Sugimoto, U. Al (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul. Paper presented at The International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 3 July (pp. 1198-1199). Turkey: Bogaziçi University Printhouse.

Testa, James. 2015, January 14. The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Process. April 20, 2016, from

Wager, E. 2007. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines for authorship?. Medscape General Medicine, 9(3), 9-16.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item