Connected learning ecologies as an emerging opportunity through Cosplay

Bender, Sophia and Peppler, Kylie Connected learning ecologies as an emerging opportunity through Cosplay. Comunicar, 2019, vol. 27, n. 58, pp. 31-40. [Journal article (Paginated)]

Preview

Text (In English)
c5803en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (384kB) | Preview

Preview

Text (En español)
c5803es.pdf
Download (396kB) | Preview

Alternative locations: https://doi.org/10.3916/C58-2019-03, https://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=58&articulo=58-2019-03

English abstract

Connected learning explains how people can build learning pathways that connect their interests, relationships, and formal learning to lead toward future opportunities such as careers. However, most learning systems are not set up ideally for connected learning; for instance, most schools still teach disciplines as discrete units that do not connect to students’ interests outside of school. We do not yet know enough about the structure of naturally occurring connected learning ecologies that do connect youth learning across contexts and help them follow pathways toward careers and other desired outcomes. Learning more about what works well on these pathways will allow us to design connected learning environments to help more youth have access to these desired opportunities. This paper analyzes two case studies of cosplayers –hobbyists who make their own costumes of media characters to wear at fan conventions– who benefited from well-developed connected learning ecologies. Cases were drawn from a larger interview study and analyzed as compelling examples of connected learning. Important themes that emerged included relationships with and sponsorship by caring others; unique pathways that start with a difficult challenge; economic opportunities related to cosplay; and comparisons with formal school experiences. This has implications for how we can design connected learning ecologies that support all learners on unique pathways toward fulfilling futures.

Spanish abstract

El aprendizaje conectado explica cómo las personas pueden construir rutas de aprendizaje conectadas a sus intereses, sus relaciones y al aprendizaje formal que lleven a oportunidades de futuro en una carrera profesional. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los sistemas de aprendizaje no están diseñados para una experiencia de aprendizaje conectado. Por ejemplo, casi todas las escuelas siguen enseñando asignaturas como unidades cerradas que no conectan con los intereses de los alumnos fuera de la escuela. Todavía no sabemos lo suficiente sobre la estructura de los ambientes naturales de aprendizaje conectado que sí activan la experiencia de aprendizaje con diferentes contextos y llevan a los alumnos hacia un camino de crecimiento. Aprender más sobre lo que funciona en estas rutas de aprendizaje nos permitirá diseñar entornos de aprendizaje conectado para ayudar a más jóvenes a obtener los resultados deseados. El presente trabajo analiza dos casos prácticos de «cosplayers» –aficionados que crean sus propios disfraces de personajes ficticios y los llevan a convenciones y eventos– que se beneficiaron de entornos de aprendizaje conectado correctamente desarrollados. Aspectos importantes que surgieron en el estudio incluyen las relaciones con el apoyo y cuidado de y hacia los otros: dos caminos únicos que comienzan con un difícil desafío: las oportunidades económicas derivadas del cosplay y las comparaciones con otras experiencias escolares formales. Todo ello afecta la manera de diseñar entornos de aprendizaje conectado que apoyen a todos los alumnos en sus caminos únicos hacia el futuro.

Item type:	Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords:	Connected learning; cosplay; learning trajectories; lifelong learning; participatory culture; case study; qualitative analysis; cultural studies; Aprendizaje conectado; cosplay; trayectorias de aprendizaje; aprendizaje permanente; cultura participativa; estudio de caso; análisis cualitativo; estudios culturales
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication G. Industry, profession and education. G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user:	Alex Ruiz
Date deposited:	01 Apr 2019 14:48
Last modified:	01 Apr 2019 14:48
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33837

Check full metadata for this record

References

Akiva, T., Kehoe, S., & Schunn, C.D. (2017). Are we ready for citywide learning? Examining the nature of within-and between-program pathways in a community-wide learning initiative. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1002 Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.556834 Barron, B. (2010). Conceptualizing and tracing learning pathways over time and setting. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 109(1), 113-127. https://bit.ly/2nFWKvP Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C.K. (2014). The Digital Youth Network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://bit.ly/2MolBCG Barron, B., Martin, C.K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021 Bell, P., Bricker, L., Reeve, S., Zimmerman, H.T., & Tzou, C. (2013). Discovering and supporting successful learning pathways of youth in and out of school: Accounting for the development of everyday expertise across settings. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Ste Bender, S. (2017). Cosplay. In K. Peppler (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (pp. 155-157). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483385198 Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363 Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K. ... &, Watkins, S.C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. https://bit.ly/2iOeKoh Jenkins, H. (2012). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90051-d Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A.J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://bit.ly/2ENQPLi Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00091 Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470733.001.0001 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815355 Maltese, A.V., & Tai, R.H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385 Maul, A., Penuel, W.R., Dadey, N., Gallagher, L.P., Podkul, T., & Price, E. (2017). Measuring experiences of interest-related pursuits in connected learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc. https://bit.ly/2MvEF1L Pascale, R. T., Sternin, J., & Sternin, M. (2010). The power of positive deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world’s toughest problems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. https://bit.ly/2OAbZSv Peppler, K., & Gresalfi, M. (2014). Re-crafting mathematics education: Designing tangible manipulatives rooted in traditional female crafts. https://bit.ly/2McuShP Philip, T.M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2017). Articulating the ‘how’, the ‘for what’, the ‘for whom’, and the ‘with whom’ in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008. Reich, J., & Ito, M. (2017). From good intentions to real outcomes: Equity by design in learning technologies. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. https://bit.ly/2MN7WSC Wardrip, P.S., & Brahms, L. (2016). Taking making to school: A model for integrating making into classrooms. In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments, Vol 1 (pp. 97-106). New York, NY: Routledge. http

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

Facebook

Twitter

RSS