Distributed digital contexts and learning: Personal empowerment and social transformation in marginalized populations

Chib, Arul and Bentley, Caitlin and Wardoyo, Reidinar-Juliane Distributed digital contexts and learning: Personal empowerment and social transformation in marginalized populations. Comunicar, 2019, vol. 27, n. 58, pp. 51-61. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text (In English)
c5805en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (160kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (En español)
c5805es.pdf

Download (169kB) | Preview

English abstract

The role of digital media and learning has often been synonymous with the use of open education resources in formal institutional settings. Further, open and distance learning has been criticized for focusing narrowly on educational objectives, ignoring socio-political issues of access and participation by marginalized populations. This study examines the lived experiences of female migrant domestic workers (N=20) in Singapore attending Open University. Mobile and social media supplement open and distance learning resources to allow for open practices of consumption, production and sharing in distributed contexts of digital learning. Marginalized students engaged in participation and collaboration activities, with specific privacy practices due to their social positions. Digital learning led to substantive learning for personal empowerment and social transformation, with aspirational strategies often involving digital skills. The discussion reflects on identity management across formal and informal digital settings as a means of transforming societal discourses of discrimination.

Spanish abstract

El rol de los medios digitales y el aprendizaje a menudo ha sido sinónimo del uso de recursos educativos abiertos en entornos institucionales formales. Además, el aprendizaje abierto y a distancia (ODL) ha sido criticado por centrarse estrictamente en los objetivos educativos, ignorando las cuestiones sociopolíticas de acceso y de participación de las poblaciones marginalizadas. Este estudio examina las experiencias de vida de un grupo de trabajadoras domésticas migrantes (N=20) en Singapur que asisten a Open University. Los medios móviles y las redes sociales complementan los recursos ODL para permitir prácticas abiertas de consumo, producción e intercambio en contextos distribuidos de aprendizaje digital. Los estudiantes marginalizados intervinieron en actividades participativas y colaborativas, con prácticas de privacidad específicas de acuerdo a sus posiciones sociales. El aprendizaje digital condujo a un aprendizaje sustantivo para el empoderamiento personal y la transformación social, con estrategias de aspiración que a menudo involucran habilidades digitales. La discusión reflexiona sobre la gestión de identidades en entornos digitales formales e informales como un medio para transformar los discursos sociales de discriminación.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Digital media; identity; open development; distance education; marginalization; migration; Medios digitales; identidad; desarrollo abierto; educación a distancia; marginalización; migración
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 01 Apr 2019 14:50
Last modified: 01 Apr 2019 14:50
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33839

References

Adams, P.C., & Warf, B. (1997). Introduction: Cybercontext and geographical context. Geographical Review, 87(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.1997.tb00067.x<br>Bentley, C,. & Chib, A. (2016). The impact of open development initiatives in lower- and middle income countries: A review of the literature. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 74(6), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.16<br>Bentley, C., Chib, A., & Povedia, S. (2017). Exploring capability and accountability outcomes of open development for the poor and marginalized: An analysis of select literature. The Journal of Community Informatics, 13(3), 98-129. https://bit.ly/2NQnn0W <br>Chib, A., & Aricat, R. (2016). Belonging and communicating in a bounded cosmopolitanism: The role of mobile phones in the integration of transnational migrants in Singapore. Information, Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.11<br>Chib, A., & Wardoyo, R.J. (2018). Differential OER impacts of formal and informal ICTs: Employability of female migrant workers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 94-113. https://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3<br>Chib, A., Malik, S., Aricat, R.G., & Kadir, S.Z. (2014). Migrant mothering and mobile phones: Negotiations of transnational identity. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913506007<br>Chib, A., Wilkin, H., & Mei Hua, S. (2013). Singapore migrants workers' use of mobile phones to seek social support. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(4), 19-34. https://bit.ly/2Om1Yfu <br>Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books. <br>Cornwall, A. (2002). Making contexts, changing places: Situating participation in development (No. IDS Working Paper 170). Sussex: Institute of Development Studies. https://bit.ly/2P0iOxB <br>Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In K. Bartlett, & R. Kennedy (Eds.). Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gende<br>Cresswell, T. (2009). Place. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Vol. 8 (pp. 169-177). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00310-2<br>Cuban, S. (2014). Transnational families, ICTs and mobile learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(6), 737-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.963182<br>Forte, A., & Lampe, C. (2013). Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: lessons from the literature. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469362<br>Galbraith, J.K. (2016). Inequality: What everyone needs to know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. <br>Gee, J.P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322<br>Gee, J.P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P.A. Moss, D.C. Pullin, J.P., Gee, E.H., Haertel, & L.J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 76-108). New York: Cambridge University Press. <br>Gee, J.P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. New York: NY: Palgrave Macmillan. <br>Guitart, M.E., & Moll, L.C. (2014). Lived experience, funds of identity and education. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515940<br>Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Gender equality in the information society. Bangalore: IT for Change. https://bit.ly/2xMAxC3 <br>Harsasi, M. (2015). The use of open educational resources in online learning: A study of students' perception. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.46469<br>Hilbert, M. (2014). Technological information inequality as an incessantly moving target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 821-8<br>Huang, S., & Yeoh, B.S.A. (2007). Emotional labour and transnational domestic work: The moving geographies of 'maid abuse' in Singapore. Mobilities, 2(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381557<br>Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/<br>König, R. (2013). Wikipedia: Between lay participation and elite knowledge representation. Information, Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.734319<br>Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355<br>Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. NY: Routledge. <br>Nelson, N., & Wright, S. (1995). Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. London: ITDG Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780445649<br>Nguyen, H., Chib, A., & Mahalingam, R. (2017). Mobile phones and gender empowerment: Negotiating the essentialist-aspirational dialectic. Information Technologies & International Development [Special Section], 13, 170-184. https://bit.ly/2OYuYXz <br>Owen, W.F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383697<br>Patiño, J.G., & Guitart, M.E. (2014). Some of the challenges and experiences of formal education in a Mobile-Centric Society (MCS). Digital Education Review, 25, 64-86. https://bit.ly/2R6ObI2 <br>Perraton, H. (2007). Open and distance learning in the developing world. New York, NY: Routledge. <br>Peter, F. (2003). Gender and the foundations of social choice: The role of situated agency. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000078006<br>Ryberg, T., & Christiansen, E. (2008). Community and social network sites as technology enhanced learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390802383801<br>Sachs, W. (Ed.). (2009). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power, Second edition. London: Zed Books. <br>Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <br>Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. <br>Sloep, P., & Heerlen, A.B. (2011). Learning networks, networked learning. [Redes de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en red]. Comunicar, 37(XIX), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-05<br>Smith, M.L., & Seward, R. (2017). Openness as social praxis. First Monday, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i4.7073<br>Srinivasan, J., & Chaudhuri, B. (2016). Open and/or apolitical: A critical re-examination of open information systems. Singapore: Singapore Internet Research Centre (SIRCA White Paper 1). https://bit.ly/2nRVt4W <br>Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone. <br>Van-Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5<br>Webb, S. (2006). Can ICT reduce social exclusion? The case of an adults' English language learning programme. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 481-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600635478<br>Zelezny-Green, R. (2014). She called, she Googled, she knew: girls' secondary education, interrupted school attendance, and educational use of mobile phones in Nairobi. Gender & Development, 22(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.889338<br>Zhao, K., & Chan, C.K.K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 63-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9188-x<br>


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item