Offen gesagt. Beschwerden eines Archivars

Hrachovec, Herbert Offen gesagt. Beschwerden eines Archivars. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen & Bibliothekare, 2018, vol. 71, n. 1, pp. 8-20. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 1977-7400-1-PB.pdf]
Preview
 Text
1977-7400-1-PB.pdf - Published version
Download (198kB) | Preview

English abstract

Speaking openly. Complaints of an archivist [translation of the title]. Disciplinary Open Access repositories differ from institutional ones in at least two important respects: the contributions they cover are restricted to an academic field, but necessarily trans-local in scope. Some difficulties that have recently been impeding the Open Access Initiative carry particular weight as far as these repositories are concerned. Two issues in particular will be discussed by referring to examples taken from a small philosophical repository Sammelpunkt. Firstly academic papers can (quite often in different versions and under various terms of use) increasingly be found in open as well as closed archives. Secondly, disciplinary repositories are overshadowed by the ubiquity of academic social web portals. One factor supporting these developments is the conceptual inadequacy of the catchphrase „Open Access“, which cannot prevent applications unintended by the initial inventors of this phrase.

German abstract

Open Access Archive für Fachdisziplinen unterscheiden sich von organisationseigenen Repositorien durch ihre geringere institutionelle Verankerung und konstitutive Translokalität. Aus ihrer Sicht fallen manche Schwierigkeiten der Open Access-Initiative besonders ins Gewicht. Am Beispiel eines kleinen disziplinären Repositoriums Sammelpunkt (für Philosophie) werden zwei Punkte hervorgehoben. Erstens finden sich Journalbeiträge (bisweilen in unterschiedlichen Versionen) immer häufiger in mehreren, offenen oder gebührenpflichtigen, Archiven. Und zweitens können spezialisierte Sammlungen der Anziehungskraft dominanter Portale im akademischen sozialen Netz nichts entgegensetzen. Die Gründe dieser Entwicklung sind zu analysieren. Eine konzeptuelle Unzulänglichkeit liegt darin, dass die publikumswirksame Rede vom offenen Zugang zur Forschungsliteratur bei näherem Hinsehen zu undifferenziert ist, um unbeabsichtigte Praktiken auszuschließen.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: disziplinäre Open Access Archive; unkontrollierte Verbreitung wissenschaftlicher Literatur; para-legaler akademischer Dokumentenhandel; disciplinary Open Access archives; uncontrolled paper dissemination; para-legal academic file sharing
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Austrian E-LIS editors
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2019 13:26
Last modified: 07 Jan 2019 13:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33857

References

Adamick, J. and Reznik-Zellen, R. (2010). Representation and Recognition of Subject Repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 16(9/10). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1045/september2010-adamick

Björk, B.-C. (2014). Open access subject repositories: An overview. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4):698–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23021

Boboc, A., Bieg, B., Felton, R., Dalley, S., and Kravtsov, Y. (2015). Invited Article: A novel calibration method for the JET real-time far infrared polarimeter and integration of polarimetry-based line-integrated density measurements for machine protection of a fusion plant. Review of Scientific Instruments, 86(9):091301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4929443

Covey, D. T. (2011). Recruiting Content for the Institutional Repository: The Barriers Exceed the Benefits. Journal of Digital Information, 12(3). URL: https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/2068

Duffy, B. E. and Pooley, J. D. (2017). “Facebook for Academics”: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu. Social Media + Society, 3(1):205630511769652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117696523

Erway, R. and OCLC Research (2012). Lasting impact: sustainability of disciplinary repositories. OCLC Research, Dublin, Ohio. OCLC: 781442686. URL: http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2012/2012-03.pdf

Neylon, C. (2008). The trouble with institutional repositories. URL: http://cameronneylon.net/blog/the-trouble-with-institutional-repositories/

Poynder, R. (2017). The State of Open Access: Some New Data. URL: https://poynder.blogspot.co.at/2017/08/the-state-of-open-access-some-new.html

Puplett, D. (2010). Subject Repositories: European Collaboration in the International Context. Ariadne (62). URL: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue62/bl-subject-repos-rpt/

Salo, D. (2008). Innkeeper at the Roach Motel. Library Trends, 57(2):98–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0031

Tay, A. (2016). 5 thoughts on open access, institutional and subject repositories. URL: http://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.co.at/2016/10/5-thoughts-on-open-access-institutional.html

Vierkant, P. (2013). Focussing on disciplinary open access repositories. URL: http://open-access-to-gender-research.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Vortrag-Paul-Vierkant.pdf

Xia, J. (2007). Disciplinary repositories in the social sciences. Aslib Journal of Information Management, volume 59:6, p. 528–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530710839605


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS