Institutionelle Repositorien – Traum und Wirklichkeit

Novotny, Gertraud and Seyffertitz, Thomas Institutionelle Repositorien – Traum und Wirklichkeit. Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2018, vol. 71, n. 1, pp. 87-106. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 2002-7405-1-PB.pdf]
Preview
 Text
2002-7405-1-PB.pdf - Published version
Download (233kB) | Preview

English abstract

Institutional Repositories (IRs) have been developed primarily to present the visibility of the research output of an institution. However, results of empirical work on the acceptance and use of institutional repositories in recent years show a rather critical picture of this apparent model of success. Even though university libraries and research institutes invested considerable resources in their construction and operation, institutional repositories were not always able to meet their expectations. Did the proponents make use of unsuitable strategies, have there been technological changes, and have IR been silently replaced by other forms and techniques of science communication? In an attempt to answer some of these and similar questions in a critical way, factors that have influenced the current status quo of IR are examined.

German abstract

Institutionelle Repositorien (IR) wurden vornehmlich entwickelt, um die Sichtbarkeit des Forschungsoutputs einer Institution darzustellen. Resultate empirischer Arbeiten über die Akzeptanz und Nutzung institutioneller Repositorien in den vergangenen Jahren zeichnen jedoch ein eher kritisches Bild dieses scheinbaren Erfolgsmodells. Denn obwohl von Universitätsbibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen Geld und Personal in ihren Aufbau und Betrieb investiert wurde, konnten institutionellen Repositorien die Erwartungshaltungen nicht immer erfüllen. Haben sich die Proponenten bei der Umsetzung der Ziele ungeeigneter Strategien bedient, gab es technologische Veränderungen und wurden IR durch andere Formen und Techniken der Wissenschaftskommunikation bereits still und leise abgelöst? Im Versuch diese und ähnliche Fragestellungen in einer essayistisch kritischen Form zu beantworten, sollen Faktoren, die den heutigen Status quo von IR mitbestimmt haben, beleuchtet werden. An Beispielen aus dem Markt für Wissenschaftskommunikation einerseits und verschiedenen Charakteristika des Forschungsprozesses andererseits, wird versucht, Entwicklungen zu skizzieren und Wirkungszusammenhänge abzuleiten, die das Modell der institutionellen Repositorien beeinflusst haben.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Institutionelles Repositorium; Fachrepositorium; Wissenschaftskommunikation; akademische soziale Netzwerke; Mandat; institutional repository; subject repository; scholarly communication; social academic networks; mandate
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HS. Repositories.
Depositing user: Austrian E-LIS editors
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2019 20:54
Last modified: 20 Jan 2019 20:54
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33873

References

Archambault É., Caruso J., Nicol A. (2014). State-of-art analysis of OA strategies to peer-review publications. http://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_2.1_sm_ec_dg-rtd_oa_policies_in_the_era_update_v05p_0.pdf (Zugriff: 13.04.18)

Arlitsch K., O‘Brien P. S. (2012). Invisible institutional repositories: addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 60-81. http://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213210

Arlitsch K., O’Brien P., Rossmann B. (2013). Managing Search Engine Optimization: An Introduction for Library Administrators. Journal of Library Administration, 53(2–3), 177–188. http://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.853499

Armbruster C., Romary L. (2010). Comparing Repository Types – Challenges and barriers for subject-based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. International Journal of Digital Library Systems, 1(4), 61–73.

Baierl A. (2016). Neue Wissenschaftskarrieren – Familiale und berufliche Perspektiven von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern. ÖIF Working Paper, 86, 50 S. http://www.oif.ac.at/publikationen/working_paper/detail/?S=ohne%3FS%3Dohne%3FS%3Dohne%3F%3Ftx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D%3D2740%3F%3F%3F&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=2764&cHash=54f9c66b1fae072ee30170312fa342ab

Basefsky S. (2009). The End of Institutional Repositories & the Beginning of Social Academic Research Service: An Enhanced Role for Libraries. Law and Technology Resources for Legal Professionals. https://www.llrx.com/2009/06/the-end-of-institutional-repositories-the-beginning-of-social-academic-research-service-an-enhanced-role-for-libraries/ (Zugriff: 19.04.2018)

Boosen M. (2008). Institutionelle Repositorien in Deutschland. Master thesis, Fachhochschule Köln. http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12894

Borrego Á. (2017). Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 185–192. http://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099

Bosch S., Henderson K. (2017). New World, Same Model – Periodicals Price Survey 2017. Library Journal (April 19, 2017). https://lj.libraryjournal.com/2017/04/publishing/new-world-same-model-periodicals-price-survey-2017/

Brown J. (2009). Comparing consortial repositories: a model-driven analysis. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/18977/1/18977.pdf (Zugriff: 05.05.2018)

Bühler M. (2014). Demystifying the Institutional Repository for Success. Oxford [u.a.]: Chandos Publ.

Burns C. S., Lana A., Budd J. M. (2013). Institutional Repositories: Exploration of Costs and Value. D-Lib Magazine, 19, 1–2. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january13/burns/01burns.html

Callicott B. B., Scherer D., Wesolek, A. (Eds.) (2016). Making Institutional Repositories Work: Purdue University Press.

Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) (2017). Rethinking Institutional Repository Strategies – Report of a CNI Executive Roundtable – held April 2 & 3, 2017 (pp. 12): Coalition for Networked Information. https://www.cni.org/topics/publishing/rethinking-institutional-repository-strategies

Covey D. T. (2011). Recruiting Content for the Institutional Repository: The Barriers Exceed the Benefits. Journal of Digital Information, 12(3). https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/2068

Creaser C., Fry J., Greenwood H., Oppenheim C., Probets S., Spezi V., White S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward Open Access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup1), 145–161. http://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.518851

Crow R. (2002). The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper, The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition, SPARC. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls690_109/Readings/Crow2002-CaseforInstitutionalRepositoriesSPARCPaper.pdf

Cullen R., Chawner B. (2011). Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002

Cullen R., Chawner B. (2010). Institutional repositories: assessing their value to the academic community. Performance Measurement and Metrics 11(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041011064052

Davis P. M. (2007). Institutional Repositories, Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13, 3/4. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html

Dean R. (2016). Shutting Down a Consortial Digital Repository Service. Journal of Library Administration, 56(1), 91–99. http://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1113064

Depping R. (2014). Publikationsservices im Dienstleistungs-Portfolio von Hochschulbibliotheken. Eine (Neu-)Verortung in der wissenschaftlichen Publikationskette. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1419 (Zugriff: 14.03.2018)

Dobratz S., Müller U. (2009). Wie entsteht ein Institutional Repository? cms-journal 32, 47–54. http://doi.org/10.18452/6570

Dubinsky, E. (2014). A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2(3), eP1167. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1167

EBSCO (2018). EBSCO Serials Price Projections 2018. https://journals.ebsco.com/products-services/explore-content (Zugriff: 26.4.2018)

Gantz P. (2012). Digital Licenses Replace Print Prices as Accurate Reflection of Real Journal Costs. Professional Scholarly Publishing Bulletin, 11/3, 1–5.

Giesecke J. (2011). Institutional Repositories: Keys to Success. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5-6), 529–542. http://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2011.589340

Harjuniemi M.-L., Lehto S. (2012). Open Access Survey: the results – survey of academic attitudes towards open access and institutional repositories. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/37729/OA-Survey_Results.pdf;sequence=1 (Zugriff: 22.03.2018)

Harnad S., Brody T., Vallières F., Carr L., Hitchcock S., Gingras Y., Oppenheim C., Stamerjohanns H., Hilf E. R. (2004). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013

Harnad S., Brody T., Vallières F., Carr L., Hitchcock S., Gingras Y., Oppenheim C., Stamerjohanns H., Hilf E. R. (2008). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36–40. http://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765150

Herb U., Müller M. (2008). The long and winding road: Institutional and disciplinary repository at Saarland University and State Library. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 24(1), 22–29. http://doi.org/10.1108/10650750810847215

Informationsplattform Open Access: http://open-access.net/AT-DE/informationen-fuer-verschiedene-zielgruppen/betreiberinnen-von-repositorien/ (Zugriff: 14.03.2018)

Jones R., Andrew, T., MacColl, J. (2006). The institutional repository (1. publ. ed.). Oxford: Chandos Publ.

Jones P., Day M., Ball A. (2009). Topic 3: Institutional repositories should be built on open source software. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 35(4), 22–26. http://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2009.1720350409

Joseph W. G. (2016). Web robot detection in scholarly Open Access institutional repositories. Library Hi Tech, 34(3), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2016-0048

Kim J. (2011): Motivations of Faculty Self-archiving in Institutional Repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017

Larivière V., Haustein S., Mongeon P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502

Lovett J. A., Rathemacher A. J., Boukari D., Lang C. (2017). Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(1): eP2183. https://dx.doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2183

Luca E., Narayan B. (2016). Redesigning the Open-Access Institutional Repository: A User Experience Approach. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a5a7/7d720e2e48b16cb683500b17dfadba17a90c.pdf (Zugriff: 01.02.2018)

Lynch C. A. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. ARL Bimonthly Report, 226(2/2003), 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039

Macgregor G. (2017). Reviewing repository discoverability: approaches to improving repository visibility and web impact. Repository Fringe 2017. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/61333/

Marsh R. M. (2015). The role of institutional repositories in developing the communication of scholarly research. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(4), 163–195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-04-2014-0022

Melero R., Abadal E., Abad F., Rodriguez-Gairin J.M. (2009). The situation of open access institutional repositories in Spain: 2009 report. Information Research 14(4). http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-4/paper415.html

Neylon C. (2008). The trouble with institutional repositories. http://cameronneylon.net/blog/the-trouble-with-institutional-repositories/ (Zugriff: 22.03.2018)

Norden R. v. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(8), 126–129. http://doi.org/10.1038/512126a

Nykanen M. (2011). Institutional Repositories at Small Institutions in America: Some Current Trends. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 23(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2011.551089

Offhaus N. (2012). Institutionelle Repositorien und Universitätsbibliotheken – Entwicklungsstand und Perspektiven. Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft 63, 1–77. https://publiscologne.th-koeln.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/57

Ortega J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520–536. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2015-0093

Peters T. A. (2002). Digital repositories: individual, discipline-based, institutional, consortial, or national? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(6), 414–417. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(02)00350-6

Pinfield S., Salter J., Bath P. A., Hubbard B., Millington P., Anders J. H. S., Hussain A. (2014). Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005–2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2404–2421. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23131

Pinfield S. (2015). Making Open Access work: The “state-of-the-art” in providing Open Access to scholarly literature. Online Information Review, 39(5), 604–636. http://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167

Ruiz-Conde E., Calderón-Martínez A. (2014). University institutional repositories. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1283–1299. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1159-5

Rusbridge C. (1995). The UK Electronic Libraries Programme. D-Lib Magazine. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december95/briefings/12uk.html (Zugriff: 28.04.2018)

Salo D. (2008). Innkeeper at the Roach Motel. Library Trends, 57(2), 98–123. http://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0031

Scherer D. (2016). Incentivizing Them to Come: Strategies, Tools, and Opportunities for Marketing an Institutional Repository. In: B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making Institutional Repositories Work (pp. 159–174). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.

Schmeja S. (2017). Der Aufschwung der Preprint-Server. TIB-Blog - Weblog der Technischen Informationsbibliothek (TIB), am 27. März 2017. https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/tib/2017/03/27/der-aufschwung-der-preprint-server/ (Zugriff: 27.06.2018)

Shoeb Z. H. (2010). Developing an institutional repository at a private university in Bangladesh. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 26(3), 198–213. http://doi.org/10.1108/10650751011073634

Shulenburger D. (2016). Substituting APCs for Subscriptions: The Cure is Worse than the Disease. http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/substituting-apcs-for-subscriptions-20july2016.pdf (Zugriff: 28.05.2018)

Stevenson J. A., Zhang J. (2015). A temporal analysis of institutional repository research. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1491–1525. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1728-x

Swan A., Carr L. (2008). Institutions, Their Repositories and the Web. Serials Review, 34(1), 31–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765149

Tillman R. K. (2017). Where Are We Now? Survey on Rates of Faculty Self-Deposit in Institutional Repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(General issue), eP2203. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2203

Velde E. V. d. (2016). Let IR RIP, http://scitechsociety.blogspot.co.at/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html (Zugriff: 02.04.2018)

Vincent-Lamarre P., Boivin J., Gargouri Y., Lariviere V., Harnad S. (2014). Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: I. The MELIBEA Score. http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2926

Weenink K., Waaijers L., Van Godtsenhoven K. (Eds.) (2007). A DRIVER’s guide to European repositories. Amsterdam University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-723637

Westell M. (2006). Institutional repositories: proposed indicators of success. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 211–226. http://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610669583

Xia J., Sun L. (2007). Factors to Assess Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories. Serials Review, 33(2), 73–80. http://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2007.10765100

Zhang H., Boock M., Wirth A. (2015). It Takes More than a Mandate: Factors that Contribute to Increased Rates of Article Deposit to an Institutional Repository. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1208. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1208


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS