Sci-Hub, a challenge for academic and research libraries

González-Solar, Llarina and Fernández-Marcial, Viviana Sci-Hub, a challenge for academic and research libraries. El profesional de la información, 2019, vol. 28, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

Text (Research article)
Sci_Hub_ a_challenge_for_academic_and_research_libraries.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (3MB) | Preview

English abstract

Sci-Hub emerged into the field of scientific communication in 2011 as a platform for free access to scientific papers. It is the most popular of the so-called shadow libraries, systems that overcome the limits of legal access to scientific publications, standing apart from the open access movement. Besides from the media coverage that has served to boost its popularity, several studies reveal the impact of Sci-Hub among researchers, who have embraced this initiative. Sci-Hub has revealed new forms of access to scientific information, affecting academic and research libraries that cannot remain on the sidelines. This study addresses the Sci-Hub phenomenon and its implications for academic and research libraries from different points of view, through a bibliographic review and an analysis of examples of action.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Academic libraries; University libraries; Shadow libraries; Information behaviour; SciHub; Scientific communication; Ethics; Legality; Legal issues; Information access; Open access; Free information; Information usage habits
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GA. Information industry.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HI. Electronic Media.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HP. e-resources.
Depositing user: Rosa M. Rojo-Briones
Date deposited: 06 Mar 2019 08:38
Last modified: 06 Mar 2019 08:38


"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

Bendezú-Quispe, Guido; Nieto-Gutiérrez, Wendy; Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel;

Taype-Rondan, Alvaro (2016). “Sci-Hub and medical practice: an ethical dilemma in Peru”. The lancet global health, v. 4, n. 9, e608.

Björk, Bo‐Christer (2017). “Gold, green, and black open access”. Learned publishing, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 173-175.

Bohannon, John (2016a). “The frustrated science student behind Sci-Hub”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, p. 51.

Bohannon, John (2016b). “Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, pp. 508-512.

Bosman, Jeroen; Kramer, Bianca (2018). “Open access levels: A quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data”. PeerJ preprints, 6, e3520v1.

Cochran, Angela (2016). “A funny thing happened on the way to OA”. The scholarly kitchen, 25 February.

Crissinger, Sarah (2017). “Access to research and Sci-Hub: Creating opportunities for campus conversations on open access and ethics”. College & research libraries news, v. 78, n. 2, pp. 86-95.

Custodians Online Campaign (2015). In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub.

De-Castro, Pablo (2016). “Breves notas sobre la conferencia anual 2016 de Liber en Helsinki”. Blog EPI, 12 July.

Elbakyan, Alexandra (2016). Why science is better with Communism? The case of Sci-Hub. Presentation.

Elbakyan, Alexandra (2017). “Some facts on Sci-Hub that Wikipedia gets wrong”. Engineering, 2 July.

Elbakyan, Alexandra (2018). “Corrections to The Verge article about Sci-Hub: part 1”. Engineuring, 16 February.

Emery, Jill (2016). “Heard on the net: Open access rhapsody”. The Charleston advisor, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 41-42.

Esposito, Joseph (2017). “Sci-Hub moves to the center of the ecosystem”. The scholarly kitchen, 5 September.

Faust, Jeremy S. (2016) “Sci-Hub. A solution to the problem of paywalls, or merely a diagnosis of a broken system?”.Annals of emergency medicine, v. 68, n. 1, pp. A15-A17.

Fernández-Marcial, Viviana; Costa, Luis-Miguel; González-Solar, Llarina (2016). “Top universities, top libraries: Do research services in academic libraries contribute to university output?”. In: Library Leadership in a Sea of Change, 37th Iatul Conference, Halifax (Canada).

Gardner, Carolyn; Gardner, Gabriel (2015). “Bypassing interlibrary loan via Twitter: An exploration of #icanhazpdf requests”.In: ACRL 2015.

Gardner, Gabriel J.; McLaughlin, Stephen R.; Asher, Andrew D. (2017). “Shadow libraries and you: Sci-Hub usage and the future of ILL”. In: ACRL 2017.

Greco, Albert N. (2017). “The Kirtsaeng and Sci-Hub cases: The major U.S. copyright cases in the twenty-first century”. Publishing research quarterly, v. 33, n. 3, pp. 238-253.

Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian (2016). “Correlating the Sci-Hub data with World Bank indicators and identifying academic use”. The winnower, v. 5, e146485.57797.

Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian (2017). “Looking into Pandora’s box: The content of Sci-Hub and its usage”. F1000Research, v. 6, n. 541.

Himmelstein, Daniel S.; Rodriguez-Romero, Ariel; Levernier, Jacob G.; Munro, Thomas-Anthony; McLaughlin, Stephen-Reid; Greshake-Tzovaras, Bastian; Greene, Casey S. (2018). “Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature”.eLife, v. 7, e32822.

Houle, Louis (2017). “Sci-Hub and LibGen: what if… why not?” In: IFLA WLIC 2017 Libraries. Solidarity. Society, 16-17 August, Gdansk (Poland).

Hoy, Matthew B. (2017). “Sci-Hub: What librarians should know and do about article piracy”. Medical reference services quarterly, v. 36, n. 1, pp. 73-78.

Khabsa, Madian; Giles, C. Lee (2014). “The number of scholarly documents on the public web”. PLoS one, v. 9, n. 5, e93949.

Kirsop, Barbara; Chan, Leslie (2005). “Transforming access to research literature for developing countries”. Serials review, v. 31, n. 4, pp. 246-255.

Larivière, Vincent; Haustein, Stefanie; Mongeon, Philippe (2015). “The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era”. PLoS one, v. 10, n. 6, e0127502.

Lawson, Stuart (2017). “Access, ethics and piracy”. Insights. The UKSG journal, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 25-30.

Machin-Mastromatteo, Juan D.; Uribe-Tirado, Alejandro; Romero-Ortiz, Maria E. (2016). “Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America”. Information development, v. 32, n. 55, pp. 1806-1814.

Marple, Holly (2018). “Parasite, pirate, and Robin Hood: Sci-Hub is disrupting the world of academic publishing”. The journal, v. 3, n. 2.

McKenzie, Lindsay (2017). “Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests”. Science news, 27 July.

McNutt, Marcia (2016). “My love-hate of Sci-Hub”. Science, v. 352, n. 6285, pp. 497-497.

Meadows, Alice (2015). “Beyond open: Expanding access to scholarly content”. The journal of electronic publishing, v. 18, n. 3.

Mejia, Christian R.; Valladares-Garrido, Mario J.; Miñan-Tapia, Armando; Serrano, Felipe T.; Tobler-Gómez, Liz E.; Pereda-Castro, William;

Mendoza-Flores, Cynthia R.; Mundaca-Manay, Maria Y.; Valladares-Garrido, Danai (2017). “Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of

Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America”. PLoS one, v. 12, n. 10, e0185673.

Nicholas, David; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa; Xu, Jie; Herman, Eti; Clark, David; Abrizah, Abdullah; Rodriguez‐Bravo, Blanca; Świgoń, Marzena (2018).

“Sci-Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front”. Learned publishing, 1 November.

Novo, Lluís A. B.; Onishi, Viviani C. (2017). “Could Sci-Hub become a quicksand for authors?”. Information development, v. 33, n. 3, pp.324-325.

Oakley, Meg (2016). Online piracy: Why Sci-Hub is disrupting scholarly publishing. Georgetown University Library.

Penn, Louise (2018). “Alternative ways of obtaining scholarly articles and the impact on traditional publishing models from a UK/European perspective”. Serials review, v. 44, n. 1, pp. 40-50.

Piwowar, Heather; Priem, Jason; Larivière, Vincent; Alperin, Juan-Pablo; Matthias, Lisa; Norlander, Bree; Farley, Ashley; West, Jevin; Haustein, Stefanie (2018). “The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles”. PeerJ, v. 6, e4375.

Priego, Ernesto (2016). “Signal, not solution: Notes on why Sci-Hub is not opening access”. The winnower, v. 5, e145624.49417.

Reichman, Hank (2016). “News: Is it legal?”. Journal of intellectual freedom and privacy, v. 1, n. 2-3, p. 50.

Ruff, Corinne (2016). “Librarians find themselves caught between journal pirates and publishers”. The chronicle of higher education, 18 February.

Russell, Carrie; Sanchez, Ed (2016). “Sci-Hub unmasked: Piracy, information policy, and your library”. College & research libraries news, v. 77, n. 3, pp. 122-125.

Sathe, Nila A.; Grady, Jenifer L.; Giuse, Nunzia B. (2002). “Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes”. Journal of the Medical Library Association, v. 90, n. 2, pp. 235- 243.

Sparc (2018). Big deal cancellation tracking.

Steel, Graham (2016). “Wallets with a serious case of Stockholm syndrome:

Sci-Hub and the future of scholarly communication”. The winnower, v. 5, e145677.73287.

Strielkowski, Wadim (2017). “Will the rise of Sci-Hub pave the road for the subscription-based access to publishing databases?”. Information development, v. 33, n. 5, pp. 540-542.

Swartz, Aaron (2008). Guerilla open access manifesto.

Tenopir, Carol; King, Donald W.; Edwards, Sheri; Wu, Lei (2009). “Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns”. Aslib proceedings, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 5-32.

Travis, John (2016). “In survey, most give thumbs-up to pirated papers”. Science news, May 6th.

Triggle, Chris R.; Triggle, David J. (2016). “From Gutenberg to open science: An unfulfilled odyssey”. Drug development research, v. 78, n. 1, pp. 3-23.

Van-Noorden, Richard (2016) “Alexandra Elbakyan: Paper pirate”. Nature, v. 540, n. 7634.

Woolston, Chris (2016). “Paper piracy sparks online debate”. Nature, 2 May.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item