Management of, Knowledge, Information and Organizational Learning in University Libraries

Ahumada Figueroa, Luis and Bustos-Gonzalez, Atilio Management of, Knowledge, Information and Organizational Learning in University Libraries. Libri, 2006, vol. 56, pp. 180-190. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (365kB) | Preview

English abstract

The dynamic advancement of technological development and the importance of information and knowledge in modern- day society have determined that the principal competitive advantage of an organization is the capacity to manage these resources adequately. The abilities and knowledge that workers are capable of developing are transformed into a resource that modern organizations value in a growing way. Educational organizations, especially universities, must take advantage of their competitive resources. That is to say, they must know how to make intensive use of their knowledge in order to improve: the process of formation and learning of their students, the generation of new knowledge produced by research and the transference of said knowledge by means of publication and technical assistance. The processes of management of knowledge, organizational learning and information are intimately linked. Therefore, significant improvements can only be obtained in organizations if synergies are generated between each one of these processes. In order to study these three processes, the Universities’ Library Systems of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso were selected as a unit of analysis, and considered as places of knowledge gathering, documentation centres and active agents in the development of abilities in the use and transference of information necessary to generate new learning and knowledge. The principal objective of this investigation was to characterize the management of information, knowledge and organizational learning in a university’s library system, analysing its relationship and the way that these processes differ depending on variables such as department membership, the characteristics of users that rely on them, etc. The efficient management of organizational learning implies not only the utilization of previous knowledge but also the creation of new knowledge within the framework of what are termed communities of learning.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Knowledge Management, Academic Libraries, Gestión del conocimiento, Bibliotecas universitarias,
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
Depositing user: Atilio Bustos-Gonzalez
Date deposited: 01 Sep 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 11:56


Ahumada, L. 2001. Teoría y cambio en las organizaciones:

Un acercamiento desde los modelos de aprendizaje

organizacional {Theory and change in organizations:

An approach from the organizational learning

models}. Valparaíso, Chile: Ediciones Universitarias

de Valparaíso.

Ahumada, L. 2002. El aprendizaje organizacional

desde una perspectiva evolutiva y constructivista

de la organización {Organizational learning from an

evolutive and constructivist point of view of the

organization}. Revista de Psicología – Universidad de

Chile 11: 139–148.

Akeroid, J. 2001. The Management of Change in

Electronic Libraries. IFLA Journal 27: 70–73.

Argote, L., McEvily, B., and Reagans, R. 2003.

Managing knowledge in organizations: An

integrative framework and review of emerging

themes. Management Science 49: 571–582.

Ascorra, P. 2002. Acción organizacional y

socioconstruccionismo {Organizational action and

socio-constructionism}. Revista de Psicología –

Universidad de Chile 11: 165–173.

Barkema, H., Baum, J., and Mannix, E. 2002.

Management challenges in a new time. Academy of

Management Journal 45: 916–930.

Bauer, K. 2001. Resources for library assessment: tools

for a new era. College & Research Libraries News 62:

12–14, 28.

Bazillion, R. J. and Braun, C. 1998. Academic libraries as

high-tech gateways: a guide to design space decision.

Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

Bor, K. 2002. Toward a theoretical framework for

understanding the relationship between situated

action and planned action models of behavior in

information retrieval contexts: Contributions from

phenomenology. Information Proccessing and

Management 38: 613–626.

Brockmann, E., and Anthony, W. 2002. Tacit

knowledge and strategic decision making. Group &

Organization Management 27: 436–455.

Brown, J. and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational

learning and communities of practice: toward a

unified view of working, learning, and innovation.

Organization Science 2: 40-57.

Bustos, A. 1996. Gestión del proceso de cambio en la era de

la información {Change process management in the

information era}. Paper presented at CHILE INFO

96: Conferencia Internacional de Bibliotecarios de

Educación Superior de América Latina y el Caribe,

Santiago, Chile, 1996.

Bustos, A. 1997. Estrategia para la gestión de la

información actual en la Universidad Austral de Chile

{Strategy for management of actual information in

the Austral University of Chile}. III Congreso de

Bibliotecología and I Encuentro Internacional de

Usuarios de CD-ROM, Universidad Austral de

Chile, Valdivia, Chile, January 1997.

Cave, M. et al. 1997 The use of performance indicators in

higher education: The challenge of the quality movement.

3rd ed. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.

Chia, R. 2000. Discourse analysis as organizational

analysis. Organization 7: 513–518.

Davenport, T., and Prusak, L. 2001. Conocimiento en

acción: Como las organizaciones manejan lo que saben

{Knowledge in action: How organizations manage

what they know}. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Pearson


DiBella, AJ., Nevis, EC., and Gould, JM. 1996.

Understanding organizations learning systems

capability. Journal of Management Studies 33: 361-379.

Duart, J., and Sangrà, A. 2000. Aprender en la virtualidad

{To learn in virtuality}. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.

Edwards, D., and Mercer, N. 1998. El conocimiento

compartido {The shared knowledge}. Madrid, Spain:


Fiol, CM. 2002. Capitalizing on paradox: the role of

language in transforming organizational identities.

Organization Science 13: 653–666.

Fowler, K. 1998. The University library as learning

organization for innovation: an exploratory study.

College and Research Libraries 59: 220–231.

Halliday, MA. 1994. An introduction to functional

grammar. London, UK: Edward Arnold.

Harasim, L. et al. 2000. Redes de aprendizaje {Learning

networks}. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.

Hatch, M., and Schultz, M. 2002. The dynamics of

organizational identity. Human Relation 55: 989–


Herrera, R. 1998. Bases para el desarrollo cualitativo de la

docencia universitaria {Strategies for the qualitative

development of university teaching}. Santiago de

Chile: Cinda.

International Organization for Standardization. 2000.

Información y documentación. Indicadores de

rendimiento Bibliotecario. (ISO 11620 – UNE 50-

137) {Information and documentation. Indicators of

librarian performance}. Revista Española de

Documentación Científica part I 22: 223–247; part II

22: 357–.

Johnson, S. et al. 2002. Team development and group

processes of virtual learning teams. Computers &

Education 39: 379–393.

Karnoe, P. 1996. The social process of competence

building. International Journal of Technology

Management, Special Issue on Unlearning and

Learning for Technological Innovation, 11: 770–789.

Kopp, J. 1998. Library consortia and information

technology: The past, the present, the promise.

Information Technology and Libraries 17(1): 7–12.

Levine, D. 2002. Thinking about doing: on learning

from experience and the flight from thinking.

Human Relations 55: 1251–1268.

Lindauer, BG. 1998. Defining and measuring the

library’s impact on campus-wide outcomes. College

& Research Libraries 59 (6): 546–570.

Mamaghani, F. 2002. Information technology

knowledge sharing using case-based reasoning.

Information Systems Management 19: 13–20.

Nicolini, D., and Meznar, M. 1995. The social

construction of organizational learning: conceptual

and practical issues in the field. Human Relations 48:


Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., and Umemoto, K. 1996. A

theory of organizational knowledge creation.

International Journal of Technology Management,

Special Issue on Unlearning and Learning for

Technological Innovation 11: 833–845.

Pérez, A. 2000. Bibliotecas y centros de documentación

en un entorno virtual {Libraries and document

centers in a virtual environment}. In: Duart, J., and

Sangrà, A. Aprender en la virtualidad {To learn in

virtuality}. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.

Perry-Smith, J., and Shalley, C. 2003. The social side of

creativity: a static and dynamic social network

perspective. Academy of Management Review 28: 89–


Potter, J., and Wetherell, M. 1987. Discourse and social

psychology. London: Sage.

Renkema, J. 2001. Manejo de la comunicación:

Evaluación de la calidad del discurso institucional

{Managing communication: evaluation of the

quality of institutional discourse}. Revista

Interamericana de Discurso y Sociedad 3: 11–33.

Robbins, T., Crino, M., and Fredendall, L. 2002. An

integrative model of the empowerment process.

Human Resource Management Review 12: 419–443.

Ruiz, J. 1996. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa

{Qualitative research methodology}. Spain:

Management of Knowledge, Information and Organizational Learning in University Libraries: A Case Study

Universidad de Deusto.

Senge, P., et al. 2002. La danza del cambio: Los retos que

sostienen el impulso en organizaciones abiertas al

aprendizaje {The change dance: the challenges that

stimulate organizations open to learning }.

Barcelona, Spain: Norma.

Sisto, V. 2002. Teoría Psicológica en Acción: La

Psicología Frente a las Consecuencias Psicológicas y

Sociales de los Procesos de Flexibilización Laboral

{Psychological theory in action: psychology against

the psychological consequences of the labour

flexibilization processes}. Psicoperspectivas Revista de

Psicología Universidad Católica de Valparaíso 1: 111–


Teare, R., Davies, D., and Sandelands, E. 2002.

Organizaciones que aprenden y formación virtual

{Organizations that learn and virtual education}.

Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.

Tsoukas, H., and Chia, R. 2002. On organizational

becoming: rethinking organizational change.

Organization Science 13: 567–582.

Van Dijk, TA. 2000. El discurso como interacción en la

sociedad {The discourse as interaction in society}.

In: Van Dijk, TA. El discurso como interacción social

{Discourse as social interaction}. Barcelona, Spain:


Vergara, A., and Isaac, J. 1998. Tecnología de la

comunicación e informática como apoyo a la docencia

{Communication and information technology as an

aid to learning}. Santiago de Chile: Cinda.

Vignolo, C. 1998. Zen en el arte de innovar: Hacia un

nuevo paradigma de la innovación empresarial

{Zen in the art of innovation: Toward a new

paradigm of business innovation}. Estudios Públicos

70: 173–200.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item