Factors influencing research data communication on Zika virus: a grounded theory

Costa, Michelli Pereira da and Leite, Fernando César Lima Factors influencing research data communication on Zika virus: a grounded theory. Journal of Documentation, 2019, vol. ahead-, n. ahead-. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of Post-print JD.pdf]
Preview
Text
Post-print JD.pdf - Accepted version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (977kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical model to illustrate factors influencing research data communication on diseases caused by the Zika virus. Design/methodology/approach – The grounded theory methodology was adopted. For data collection, interviews were conducted with 13 Brazilian researchers involved with the Zika virus theme. Data analysis was performed using the open, axial and selective coding processes, according to the principles of the grounded theory. Findings – Based on data collection and analysis, seven theoretical categories representing intervening factors in Zika virus research data communication were identified. The emerging theory showed the centrality of researchers’ expectations for acknowledgment and reward, influenced by the aspects of research funding and academic culture. Three factors involved in the macro processes of research data communication: data use, data production and data sharing. In the use and production processes, factors related to collaboration figured most strongly. In the production and sharing processes, the factors regarding data processing and the use of research data repositories were more pronounced. Finally, data sharing, and the possibility of reusing data are directly affected by the social context of Zika virus disease as an emerging disease. Originality/value – The study presents a theory developed systematically to explain the phenomenon of communication of research data on Zika virus. The theory presents a set of intervening factors of the process of communication of research data and discusses the factors in light of the fundamentals of information science

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Research data, Scientific communication, Open data, Data sharing, Open science, Academic culture, Data communication.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
C. Users, literacy and reading.
E. Publishing and legal issues.
Depositing user: Fernando César Lima Leite
Date deposited: 19 Aug 2019 07:38
Last modified: 19 Aug 2019 07:38
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/38917

References

Associated Press (2016), “G1– Brasil sonega amostras de zika para pesquisa no exterior, dizem cientistas – Notícias em Ciência e Saúde”, available at: http://g1.globo.com/ciencia-e-saude/ noticia/2016/02/brasil-sonega-amostras-de-zika-para-pesquisa-no-exterior-dizem-cientistas.html (accessed March 30, 2016).

Bond, C.S., Ahmed, O.H., Hind, M., Thomas, B. and Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2013), “The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data”, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15 No. 6, p. e112, doi: 10.2196/jmir.2435.

Boulton, G. (2013), “Reinventing open science for the 21st century”, in Rodrigues, E., Swan, A. and baptista, A.A. (Eds), Uma década de acesso aberto na UMinho e no mundo, Braga: Universidade do Minho, Serviços de Documentação, Lisbon, pp. 239-250.

Brase, J., Farquhar, A., Gastl, A., Gruttemeier, H., Heijne, M., Heller, A., Piguet, A., et al. (2009), “Approach for a joint global registration agency for research data”, Information Services and Use, Vol. 29 No. 1.

Brasil (2015a), Protocolo de vigilância e resposta à ocorrência de microcefalia, Ministério da Saúde, Brasil, available at: http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2016/janeiro/22/microcefalia- protocolo-de-vigilancia-e-resposta-v1-3-22jan2016.pdf

Brasil (2015b), “Lei no 13.123/2015 Brasil”, available at: www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-20 18/2015/lei/l13123.htm.

Brasil (2016), “Monitoramento dos casos de dengue, febre de chikungunya e febre pelo vírus Zika até a Semana Epidemiológica 03, 2016”, Boletim Epidemiológico, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 1-10.

Bruniera-Oliveira, R.B.O., Horta, M.A.P.P., Belo, V.S.S., Carmo, E.H. and Verani, J.F.S. (2014), “Desenvolvimento da Vigilância Epidemiológica de Fronteira no contexto da Globalização: conceitos e marcos teóricos”, Tempus Actas de Saúde Coletiva, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 75-93.

Carmo, E.H., Penna, G. and Oliveira, W.K.D. (2008), “Public health emergencies: concept, characterization, preparation and response”, Estudos Avançados, Vol. 22 No. 64, pp. 19-32.

Chaves, M.R.O., Bernardo, A.S., Bernardo, C.D., Dias Filho, J.F., Paula, H.S.C. and Passos, X.S. (2015), “Dengue, Chikungunya e Zika: a nova realidade brasileira Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika: new Brazilian reality”, Newslab, Vol. 132.

Childs, S. and Mcleod, J. (2004), “Sharing research records and research data: findings from a research project in higher education”, New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 131-145.

Cox, A., Verbaan, E. and Sen, B. (2012), “Upskilling liaison librarians for research data management”, Ariadne, No. 70, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/cox-et-al.

Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Darby, R., Gitmans, K., Lambert, S., Matthews, B., Mele, S., Suhonen, J. and Wilson, M. (2014), “Enabling sharing and reuse of scientific data”, New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 16-43.

Douglass, K., Allard, S., Tenopir, C., Wu, L. and Frame, M. (2014), “Managing scientific data as public assets: data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 251-262.

Dye, C., Bartolomeos, K., Moorthy, V. and Kieny, M.P. (2016), “Data sharing in public health emergencies: a call to researchers”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, v. 2.

Fecher, B., Friesike, S. and Hebing, M. (2015), “What drives academic data sharing?”, PloS One, Vol. 10 No. 2.

Gardner, W. (2004), “Compelled disclosure of scientific research data”, The Information Society, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 141-146.

Garvey, W.D. (1979), Communication: The Essence of Science: Facilitating Information Exchange among Librarians, Scientists, Engineers and Students, Elsevier, Burlington, VT.

Gezelter, D. (2009), “What, exactly, is open science?”, The Open Science Project, available at: www.openscience.org/blog/?p=269 (accessed October 4, 2016).

Grant, M.J. and Booth, A. (2009), “A typology of reviews: an analysis of review types and associated methodologies”, Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 91-108.

Hey, T. and Trefethen, A. (2008), “E-Science, cyberinfrastructure and scholarly communication”, in Olson, G., Zimmerman, A. and Bos, N. (Eds), Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, MIT Press, London, pp. 15-31.

Higman, R. and Pinfield, S. (2015), “Research data management and openness: the role of data sharing in developing institutional policies and practices”, Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 364-381.

Jacomy, M., et al. (2014), “ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi Software”, Plos One, Vol. 9 No. 6, p. 98679.

Knight, G. (2015), “Building a research data management service for the London school of hygiene & tropical medicine”, Program, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 424-439.

Losoff, B. (2009), “Electronic scientific data & literature aggregation: a review for librarians”, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Vol. 59.

Lopez, F. (2015), “Workshop de datos científicos”, Introducción. In: Conicet, available at: http://pt.slideshare.net/fernandoariellopez/workshop-de-datos-cientficos-introduccin (accessed December 7, 2015).

Melero, R. and Hernández-San-Miguel, J. (2014), “Acceso abierto a los datos de investigación, una vía hacia la colaboración científica”, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, Vol. 37 No. 4, p. e066.

Mlakar, J., Korva, M., Tul, N., Popović, M., Poljšak-Prijatelj, M., Mraz, J., Kolenc, M., Resman Rus, K., Vesnaver Vipotnik, T., Fabjan Vodušek, V. and Vizjak, A. (2016), “Zika virus associated with microcephaly”, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 374 No. 10, pp. 951-958.

Musso, D., Roche, C., Robin, E., Nhan, T., Teissier, A. and Cao-Lormeau, V.M. (2015), “Potential sexual transmission of zika virus”, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 359-361.

National Institutes of Health (2003), NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, May 3, available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_ sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm#goals.

Ruttenberg, S. and Rishbeth, H. (1994), “Sir Granville Beynon: a celebration of his eightieth birthday on 24 May 1994 World Data Centres – past, present and future”, Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 56 No. 7, pp. 865-870.

Sankoh, O. and Ijsselmuiden, C. (2011), “Sharing research data to improve public health: a perspective from the global south”, The Lancet, Vol. 378 No. 9789, pp. 401-402.

Santilli, J. (2015), “Biodiversidade e Conhecimentos Tradicionais Associados: o Novo Regime Jurídico de Proteção”, Revista do Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios, Vol. 9, pp. 21-73.

Søndergaard, T.F., Andersen, J. and Hjørland, B. (2003), “Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: revising and updating the UNISIST model”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 278-320.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2008), “Pesquisa qualitativa: técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de teoria fundamentada”, Porto Alegre, Artmed.

Sturges, P., Bamkin, M., Anders, J.H., Hubbard, B., Hussain, A. and Heeley, M. (2015), “Research data sharing: developing a stakeholder-driven model for journal policies”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 66, pp. 2445-2455.

Thompson, C.A., Robertson, W.D. and Greenberg, J. (2014), “Where have all the scientific data gone? LIS perspective on the data-at-risk predicament”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 75 No. 6, pp. 13-500.

Vasconcelos, P.F.D.C. (2015), “Doença pelo vírus Zika: um novo problema emergente nas Américas?”, Revista Pan-Amazônica de Saúde, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 9-10.

Walport, M. and Brest, P. (2011), “Sharing research data to improve public health”, The Lancet, Vol. 377 No. 9765, pp. 537-539.

Whitmire, E. (2002), “Disciplinary differences and undergraduates’ information-seeking behavior”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 8, pp. 631-638.

Whitmire, A.L., Boock, M. and Sutton, S.C. (2015), “Variability in academic research data management practices: implications for data services development from a faculty survey”, Program, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 382-407.

WHO (2009), “Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control”, World Health Organization.

WHO (2016), “Latest Zika situation report”, WHO, February 19. available at: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11669&Itemid=41716&lang=en (accessed February 27, 2016).

WHO (2017), “Zika: response funding”, available at: http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/response/contribution/en/ (accessed February 2, 2018).

Whyte, A. and Pryor, G. (2011), “Open science in practice: researcher perspectives and participation”, IJDC, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 199-213.

Zanluca, C., Melo, V.C.A.D., Mosimann, A.L.P., Santos, G.I.V.D., Santos, C.N.D.D. and Luz, K. (2015), “First report of autochthonous transmission of Zika virus in Brazil”, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 110 No. 4, pp. 569-572.

Zatz, M. (2000), “Projeto genoma humano e ética”, São Paulo em Perspectiva, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 47-52.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item