Wikipedia: an opportunity to rethink the links between sources’ credibility, trust and authority

Sahut, Gilles and Tricot, André Wikipedia: an opportunity to rethink the links between sources’ credibility, trust and authority. First monday, 2017, vol. 22, n. 11. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of ATC_Articlereorga20171003_GS_AT.pdf]
Preview
 Text
ATC_Articlereorga20171003_GS_AT.pdf - Accepted version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.
Download (578kB) | Preview

English abstract

The web and its main tools (Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter) deeply raise and renew fundamental questions, that everyone asks almost every day: Is this information or content true? Can I trust this author or source? These questions are not new, they have been the same with books, newspapers, broadcasting and television, and, more fundamentally, in every human interpersonal communication. This paper is focused on two scientific problems on this issue. The first one is theoretical: to address this issue, many concepts have been used in library and information sciences, communication and psychology. The links between these concepts are not clear: sometimes two concepts are considered as synonymous, sometimes as very different. The second one is historical: sources like Wikipedia deeply challenge the epistemic evaluation of information sources, compared to previous modes of information production. This article proposes an integrated and simple model considering the relation between a user, a document and an author as human communication. It reduces the problem to three concepts: credibility as a characteristic granted to information depending on its truth-value; trust as the ability to produce credible information; authority when the power to influence of an author is accepted, i.e. when readers accept that the source can modify their opinion, knowledge, and decisions. The model describes also two kinds of relationships between the three concepts: an upward link and a downward link. The model is confronted with the findings of empirical research on Wikipedia in particular.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Wikipedia cognitive authority epistemic trust credibility Web 2.0
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HT. Web 2.0, Social networks
Depositing user: Mr Gilles Sahut
Date deposited: 17 Sep 2019 08:41
Last modified: 17 Sep 2019 08:41
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/38957

References

C. L. Barry and L. Schamber, 1998. “Users’ criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparaison,” Information Processing and Management, volume 34, numbers 2–3, pp. 219–236.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00078-2, accessed 5 October 2017.

P. Bourdieu, 1977. “The economics of linguistic exchanges,” Social Science Information, volume 16, number 6, pp. 645–668.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601, accessed 5 October 2017.

M. Colón-Aguirre and R. A. Fleming-May, 2012. “‘You just type in what you are looking for’: Undergraduates’ use of library resources vs. Wikipedia,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, volume 38, number 6, pp. 391–399.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.09.013, accessed 5 October 2017.

W. Choi and B. Stvilia, 2015. “Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, volume 66, number 12, pp. 2,399–2,414.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23543, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger, 2011. “From Encyclopaedia Britannica to Wikipedia: Generational differences in the perceived credibility of online encyclopedia information,” Information, Communication & Society, volume 14, number 3, pp. 355–374.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.542823, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger, 2010. Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger, 2008. “Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility,” In: A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger (editors). Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 5–28.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.005, accessed 5 October 2017.

B. J. Fogg, 2003. “Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online,” CHI EA ’03: CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 722–723.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.765951, accessed 5 October 2017.

B. J. Fogg, C. Soohoo, D. R. Danielson, L. Marable, J. Stanford and E.R. Tauber, 2003. “How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants,” DUX ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, pp. 1–15.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/997078.997097, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Ford, S. Sen, D. R. Musicant and N. Miller, 2013. “Getting to the source: Where does Wikipedia get its information from?” WikiSym ’13: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Open Collaboration, article number 9.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491064, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. Forte and C. Lampe, 2013. “Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature,” American Behavioral Scientist, volume 57, number 5, pp. 535–547.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469362, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. Forte and A. Bruckman, 2005, “Why do people write for Wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open-content publishing,” Proceedings of Group 2005 Workshop: Sustaining community: The role and design of incentive mechanisms in online systems, at http://jellis.org/work/group2005/papers/forteBruckmanIncentivesGroup.pdf, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Francke and O. Sundin, 2012. “Negotiating the role of sources: Educators’ conceptions of credibility in participatory media,” Library & Information Science Research, volume 34, number 3, pp. 169–175.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.12.004, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Francke, O. Sundin and L. Limberg, 2011. “Debating credibility: The shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school,” Journal of Documentation, volume 67, number 4, pp. 675–694.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145043, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Georgas, 2014. “Google vs. the library (Part II): Student search patterns and behaviors when using Google and a federated search tool,” portal: Libraries and the Academy, volume 14, number 4, pp. 503–532.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0034, accessed 5 October 2017.

N. Generous, G. Fairchild, A. Deshpande, S. Y. Del Valle and R. Priedhorsky, 2014. “Global disease monitoring and forecasting with Wikipedia,” PLoS Computational Biology, volume 10, number 11, at http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003892, accessed 1 November 2016.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003892, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. J. Head and M. B. Eisenberg, 2010. “How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research,“ First Monday, volume 15, number 3, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2830/2476, accessed 1 November 2016.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i3.2830, accessed 5 October 2017.

B. Hilligoss and S. Y. Rieh, 2008. “Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context,” Information Processing and Management, volume 44, number 4, p. 1,467–1,484.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001, accessed 5 October 2017.

C. I. Hovland, I. L. Janis and H. H. Kelley, 1953. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

J. Jessen and A. H. Jørgensen, 2012. “Aggregated trustworthiness: Redefining online credibility through social validation,” First Monday, volume 17, number 1, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3731/3132, accessed 1 November 2016.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i1.3731, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Julien and S. Barker, 2009. “How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development,” Library & Information Science Research, volume 31, number 1, pp. 12–17.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008, accessed 5 October 2017.

K. Kelton, K. R. Fleischmann and W. A. Wallace, 2008. “Trust in digital information,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 59, number 3, pp. 363–374.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20722, accessed 5 October 2017.

A. Keen, 2007. The cult of the amateur: how today’s Internet is killing our culture. London: Nicholas Brealey.

C. Knight and S. Pryke, 2012. “Wikipedia and the university, a case study,” Teaching in Higher Education, volume 17, number 6, pp. 649–659.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666734, accessed 5 October 2017.

I. Kubiszewski, T. Noordewier and R. Costanza, 2011. “Perceived credibility of Internet encyclopedias,” Computers & Education, volume 56, number 3, pp. 659–667.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.008, accessed 5 October 2017.

C. C. Kuhlthau, 1991. “Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 42, number 5, pp. 361–371.

S. Lim, 2009. “How and why do college students use Wikipedia?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 60, number 11, pp. 2,189–2,202.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21142, accessed 5 October 2017.

T. Lucassen and J. M. Schraagen, 2012. “Propensity to trust and the influence of source and medium cues in credibility evaluation,” Journal of Information Science, volume 38, number 6, pp. 566–577.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551512459921, accessed 5 October 2017.

T. Lucassen and J. M. Schraagen, 2011. “Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 62, number 7, pp. 1,232–1,242.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21545, accessed 5 October 2017.

B. Luyt and D. Tan, 2010. “Improving Wikipedia’s credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 61, number 4, p. 715–722.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21304, accessed 5 October 2017.

K. L. Maglaughlin and D. H. Sonnenwald, 2002. “User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments,” Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 53, number 5, pp. 327–342.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10049, accessed 5 October 2017.

P. J. McKenzie, 2003. “Justifying cognitive authority decisions: Discursive strategies of information seekers,” Library Quarterly, volume 73, number 3, pp. 261–288.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/603418, accessed 5 October 2017.

E. Menchen-Trevino and E. Hargittai, 2011. “Young adults’ credibility assessment of Wikipedia,” Information, Communication & Society, volume 14, number 1, pp. 24–51.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691181003695173, accessed 5 October 2017.

M. Mestyán, T. Yasseri and J. Kertész, 2013. “Early prediction of movie box office success based on Wikipedia activity big data,” PLoS ONE, volume 8, number 8, e71226.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071226, accessed 1 November 2016.

M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin and R. B. Medders, 2010. “Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online,” Journal of Communication, volume 60, number 3, pp. 413–439.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x, accessed 5 October 2017.

M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D. R. Lemus and R. M. Mccann, 2003. “Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment,” Annals of the International Communication Association, volume 27, pp. 293–335.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029, accessed 5 October 2017.

D. M. Neal and P. J. McKenzie, 2011. “Putting the pieces together: Endometriosis blogs, cognitive authority, and collaborative information behavior,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, volume 99, number 2, pp. 127–134.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.004, accessed 5 October 2017.

G. Origgi, 2015. La réputation: Qui dit quoi de qui. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

G. Origgi, 2008. Qu’est-ce que la confiance? Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.

G. Origgi, 2004. “Is trust an epistemological notion?” Episteme, volume 1, number 1, pp. 61–72.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2004.1.1.61, accessed 5 October 2017.

K. Purcell, A. Heaps, J. Buchanan and L. Friedrich, 2013. “How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms,” Pew Research Center (28 February), at http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/28/how-teachers-are-using-technology-at-home-and-in-their-classrooms/, accessed 1 November 2016.

V. A. Rasoamampianina, 2012. “How is encyclopaedia authority established?” Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, at http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3414/, accessed 5 October 2017.

J. M. Reagle, 2010. Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

S. Y. Rieh, 2010. “Credibility and cognitive authority of information,” In: M. Bates and M. N. Maack (editors). Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1,337–1,344.

S. Y. Rieh, 2002. “Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 53, number 2, pp. 145–161.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10017, accessed 5 October 2017.

D. Robins and J. Holmes, 2008. “Aesthetics and credibility in Web site design,” Information Processing and Management, volume 44, number 1, pp. 386–399.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003, accessed 5 October 2017.

G. Sahut, 2014a. “Les jeunes, leurs enseignants et Wikipédia: Représentations en tension autour d’un objet documentaire singulier,” Documentaliste-Sciences de l’information, volume 51, pp. 70–79.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/docsi.512.0070, accessed 5 October 2017.

G. Sahut, 2014b. “‘Citez vos sources’: Archéologie d’une règle au cœur du savoir wikipédien (2002–2008), Études de Communication, number 42, pp. 97–110.

doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/edc.5721, accessed 5 October 2017.

R. Savolainen, 2007. “Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information,” Information Research, volume 12, number 3, paper 319, at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-3/paper319.html, accessed 1 November 2016.

N. Selwyn and S. Gorard, 2016. “Students’ use of Wikipedia as an academic resource — Patterns of use and perceptions of usefulness,” Internet and Higher Education, volume 28, pp. 28–34.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.004, accessed 5 October 2017.

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

S. S. Sundar, 2008. “The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility,” In: A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger (editors). Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. pp. 73–100.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073, accessed 5 October 2017.

O. Sundin, 2011. “Janitors of knowledge: Constructing knowledge in the everyday life of Wikipedia editors,” Journal of Documentation, volume 67, number 5, pp. 840–862.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111164709, accessed 5 October 2017.

O. Sundin and J. Haider, 2013. “The networked life of professional encyclopaedias: Quantification, tradition, and trustworthiness,” First Monday, volume 18, number 6, at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4383/3686, accessed 1 November 2016.

doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i6.4383, accessed 5 October 2017.

P. Sztompka, 2007. “Trust in science: Robert K. Merton’s inspirations,” Journal of Classical Sociology, volume 7, number 7, pp. 211–220.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078038, accessed 5 October 2017.

H. Tseng and B. J. Fogg, 1999. “Credibility and computing technology,” Communications of the ACM, volume 42, number 5, pp. 39–44.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301402, accessed 5 October 2017.

C. N. Wathen and J. Burkell, 2002. “Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 53, number 2, pp. 134–144.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10016, accessed 5 October 2017.

C. Watson, 2014. “An exploratory study of secondary students’ judgments of the relevance and reliability of information,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, volume 65, number 7, pp. 1,385–1,408.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23067, accessed 5 October 2017.

D. Westerman, P. R. Spence and B. Van Der Heide, 2012. “A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter,” Computers in Human Behavior, volume 28, number 1, pp. 199–206.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.001, accessed 5 October 2017.

P. Wilson, 1983. Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

R. Yeo, 2001. Encyclopaedic visions: Scientific dictionaries and enlightenment culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS