Scientometric Analysis of Quarterly E-journals of Health Science

Suradkar, Priya and Kalbande, D.T. and Hemke, D.A. Scientometric Analysis of Quarterly E-journals of Health Science. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019, pp. 1-15. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
Scientomatric.pdf

Download (852kB) | Preview

English abstract

The main objective of the study is to find out most prolific authors and journals in the health medicine research output during 2001 to 2013. A total of 20724 research papers were examined by growth of contribution by year and volume, authorship pattern. Highest number of contribution i.e. 2335 (11.27%) were published in the year 2011. Issue Number 4 published articles in the maximum 1907 (09.20%) articles, Multi-authored highest articles, Findings of the analysis revealed that the majority of the publications are contributed by multiple author, Highest number of papers was published by more than three authors and it accounts for 9472 with 45.71%; the most language used for communication was English, Journal of Internal Medicine had contributed maximum number of citations.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientometric, Scientometric Study, Bibliometric, E-Journal, Authorship Pattern, Citation Analysis.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Dr Dattatraya kalbande
Date deposited: 25 Sep 2019 06:56
Last modified: 25 Sep 2019 06:56
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/38977

References

• Amsaveni, N., &Vasanthi, R. (2013). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of network security. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 3(1), 52-54.

• Becher , S. (1989). Motivations for citation- A comparison of self citation and citation to others Scientometrics 21 (2) pp -245-254.

• Bonitz , S. (1999). Motivations for citation- A comparison of self citation and citation to others Scientometrics 21 (2) pp -245-254.

• Cronin, Blaise. Shaw, Debora And Barre, Kathryn La. (2001). A cast of thousands: coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy, jasist, 54 (9):855–871.

• Gupta, B. M. (1998). India’s collaboration with people’s republic of china in science and technology: a scientometric analysis of coauthored papers during 1994-1999. Scientometrics, 57 (1), 59-74.

• Karisiddappa, Maheswarappa, and Shirol (1990), Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research in Psychology, IASLIC Bulletin 35(2) 1990, 73-78.

• Mahapatra,M. (1985). On the validity of the theory of exponential growth of scientific literature. In 15th IASLIC conference proceedings: Banglor, IASLIC, P 61-70.

• Mahapatra, G. (1980). Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research: a citation analysis. Library Review, 55(9), 598-607.

• Pradhan, Panda, and Chandrakar (2011), Authorship Pattern and Degree of Collaboration in Indian Chemistry Literature, 8th International CALIBER-2011, Goa University, Goa, March 02-04, 2011, 691-699.

• Sengupta, I. N. (1990). Bibliometeris and identification of care periodicals. Herald of Library Science. 29(3-4), 226-245.

• Suradkar P.A. and Dr. Daya Dalve (2016). Authorship Pattern and Degree of Collaboration in Academic Emergency Medicine. International Research: Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.6 No.1, 112-121.

• Thompso, M. (2008). Introducation to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. New Yark: Morgan and Claypool.

• Vimala, V., & Reddy, V. P. (1996). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of zoology. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol.1, no. 2: 43-50.

• Zafrunnisha and Pulla Reddy (2009), Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in psychology, Annals of Library and Information Studies • January 2009.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item