Research Output and Citation Analysis of Leading Global Engineering Research Countries during 2002-16

Dutt, Mahipal and Brar, Khushpreet Singh Research Output and Citation Analysis of Leading Global Engineering Research Countries during 2002-16. GNIMS - International e-Journal of Library Science, 2017, vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 83-90. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
dutt.pdf
Download (797kB) | Preview

English abstract

In the present study, output and citation analysis of research activities in engineering in the world are mapped during 2002-2016.The study aims to promote the awareness of the global research output in engineering. With this aim, Scimago Journal & Country Rank data (Scopus® database of Elsevier) has been accessed for obtaining the required scholarly publication data. An attempt for evaluation on different qualitative and quantitative parameters like number of publications, citation analysis, research output, and h-index has been done. With these indicators in the research, analysis and assessment of total 7252275 publications from engineering field were done. The results show that out of the total research output, China stands first with 22.22% share of the research and is followed by United States (17.78%) and Japan (6.04%). Outstanding countries in engineering research have significant impact and 68.93% of the total global engineering research has been done in 10 leading countries. During the period of study, the research output of engineering has improved considerably with an average annual growth of 6.88%

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Research Output, Citation Analysis, India
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information.
C. Users, literacy and reading.
D. Libraries as physical collections.
H. Information sources, supports, channels.
I. Information treatment for information services
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
K. Housing technologies.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Dr Khushpreet Singh Brar
Date deposited: 24 Sep 2019 16:48
Last modified: 24 Sep 2019 16:48
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39007

References

Banshal, S K, Singh V K, Basu A & Muhuri, P K. (2017). Research performance of Indian Institutes of Technology.

CURRENT SCIENCE , 112 (5), 923-932.

 Barrot, J. S. (2017). Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics.

Scientometrics , 110 (1), 1-15.

 Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa, & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race.

Scientometrics , 93 (1), 59-87.

 Cañas-Guerrero, I., Mazarrón, F. R., Pou-Merina, A., Calleja-Perucho, C., & Suárez-Tejero, M. F. (2013). Analysis

of research activity in the field of “ Engineering Civil” through bibliographic methods. Engineering Structures , 73,

2273-2286.

 Chen, W., Liu, W., Geng, Y., Brown, M. T., Gao, C., & Wu, R. (2017). Recent progress on emergy research: A

bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 73, 1051-1060.

 Elango, B., Rajendran, P., & Bornmann, L. (2016). A scientometric analysis of international collaboration and

growth of literature at the macro level. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science , 20 (2).

 Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2010). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008.

Scientometrics , 86 (2), 261-283.

 Hadagali, G. S., & Anandhalli, G. (2015). Modeling the growth of Neurology Literature. Journal of Information

Science Theory and Practice , 3 (3), 45-63.

 Hussain, A., & Swain, D. K. ( 2011). A citation analysis of top research papers of computer science. International

Research: Journal of Library and Information Scienc .

 Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., Hurtado, M., Rajendran, P., & Sangam, D. (2011). Mapping global trends

in engineering education research, 2005–2008. International Journal of engineering education , 27 (1), 77-90.

 Kaur, H., & Gupta, B. M. (2009). Indian contribution in immunology and microbiology 1999-2008: A scientometric

analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology , 29 (5), 36.

 Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of

scientific and technical knowledge?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 68 (4),

984-998


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS