Which Inclusive Globalisation?

Albagli, Sarita Which Inclusive Globalisation?, 2019 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of Which Inclusive Globalization_Sarita Albagli_fv.pdf]
Preview
Text
Which Inclusive Globalization_Sarita Albagli_fv.pdf

Download (295kB) | Preview

English abstract

The text inquires about the possible meanings of an "inclusive globalization" from four main argumentative sets: (a) the emerging climate regime and its corresponding regime of knowledge and information; (b) the recognition of other epistemologies and narratives, as well as the contributions both from the peripheries and “from below”; (c) the issues raised by the open Science movements; (d) the thesis of a common Science or a Science of the common. Text presented at the COASPA 2019, held in Copenhagen from 24 to 24 September, 2019, as the Keynote of Panel 2 “Inclusive globalization – views from developing regions “.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: globalisation, Open Science, Common Science, climate change
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
Depositing user: Dr Sarita Albagli
Date deposited: 14 Oct 2019 07:43
Last modified: 18 Oct 2019 09:10
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39082

References

Albagli, S. (2015). Open Science in Question In: Sarita Albagli, Maria Lucia Maciel & Alexandre H. Abdo (Eds.). Open Science, Open Issues. Brasília: Ibict; Rio de Janeiro: Unirio. http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1061

Albagli, S., Clinio, A., Parra, H., Fonseca, F. (2019). Beyond the Dichotomy between Natural and Knowledge Commons: Reflections on the IAD Framework from the Ubatuba Open Science Project In Leslie Chan and Pierre Mounier (Eds.) Connecting the Knowledge Commons: from Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure. Elpub 2018; Open Edition Press. Available at https://books.openedition.org/oep/9029

Annan, K. (2003). A challenge to the world’s scientists. Science, 299, p. 1485.

Appel, A.L,; Albagli, S. (2019). The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals. Transinformação, v. 31. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e180045

Bourdieu, P. (1976). Le champ scientifique. ARRS, n. 2, p. 88-104.

Bhabha, Homi (1994). The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.

Debat H.; , Babini D. (2019). Plan S in Latin America: A precautionary note. PeerJ Preprints 7:e27834v2 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27834v2

Chen, G.; Posada, A.; Chan, L.. (2019) Vertical Integration in Academic Publishing: Implications for Knowledge Inequality In Leslie Chan and Pierre Mounier (Eds.) Connecting the Knowledge Commons: from Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure. Elpub 2018; Open Edition Press. Available at: https://books.openedition.org/oep/9068

Foucault, M. (2002 [1973]). A verdade e as formas jurídicas. Rio de Janeiro: Nau Editora.

Foucault, M. (2003 [1997]). Society Must Be Defended: "Society Must Be Defended": Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. New York: Picador.

Freire, P. (2005 [1970]). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. Available at: https://commons.princeton.edu/inclusivepedagogy/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2016/07/freire_pedagogy_of_the_oppresed_ch2-3.pdf

Lafuente, A., & Estalella, A. (2015). “Ways of Science: public, open, and commons.” In S. Albagli, S., M.L. Maciel, & A.H. Abdo (Eds). Open Science, open issues. Brasília: Ibict, Rio de Janeiro: Unirio. http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1061

Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mignolo, W. D. (2001). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly 101(1), Duke University Press. p. 57-98

Neylon, C. (2018). The Local and the Global: Puncturing the myth of the “international” journal [online]. SciELO in Perspective, 2018. Available at: https://blog.scielo.org/en/2018/09/03/the-local-and-the-global-puncturing-the-myth-of-the-international-journal/

Said, E. Orientalism (1978). New York: Pantheon Books.

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Paradigm Publishers.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988). ‘Can the subaltern speak?’in C.Nelson and L.Grossberg(eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana,IL:University ofIllinois Press.

Stengers, I. (2005). Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices. Cultural Studies Review, v. 11, n. 1, March.

Stevens, M., Vitos, M., Altenbuchner, J., Conquest, G., Lewis, J. & Haklay, M. (2014). Taking Participatory Citizen Science to Extremes. Pevasive Computing, April-June.

Stengers, I. (2010 [2003]). Cosmopolitics (I and II). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Vessuri, H., Guédon, , J-C. & Cetto, A.M. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on Science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current Sociology 62 (5): 647-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item