План S принять нельзя отказать

Назаровец, С. and Скалабан, А. План S принять нельзя отказать. Наука и инновации, 2019, n. 12, pp. 81-84. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of nazarovets_skalaban2019.pdf]
Preview
Text
nazarovets_skalaban2019.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (252kB) | Preview

English abstract

The Plan S initiative is expected to radically change the market of scholarly periodicals, resulting in the abandoning of the subscription model in favour of the open access model. This transition poses new challenges, as well as sets new tasks for researchers, managers, librarians and scientific publishers, particularly in countries with transforming economies. In this study, we set out to estimate approximate costs and future prospects associated with the transition of Belarus and Ukraine towards open access to scientific information on the example of publications by researchers from these two countries in Elsevier journals. To this end, we accessed the Scopus database and selected all papers affiliated with Belarus and Ukraine published by Elsevier journals in 2018. Subsequently, we established which of these articles indicated a corresponding author from Ukraine or Belarus, as well as collected journal titles, correspondence addresses, access types and the APC fee for each article. In addition, funding sources were established for each open access article. This allowed us to determine the total amount of money that Ukraine and Belarus would have needed to pay so that all the articles of their researchers, which were published in Elsevier journals in 2018, were available in an open-access form. The obtained results show that Belarus and Ukraine are currently under-investing in the support of scientific publications and subscription to scientific resources, which is necessary for making a transition to the model of open access to scientific literature. The proposed method for calculating the expenses of publishing papers written by researchers from a given country in open access can be used in the preparation of transformative agreements with developing countries.

Russian abstract

В недалеком будущем инициатива План S, возможно, в корне изменит рынок научной периодики и мир откажется от подписной бизнес-модели в пользу бизнес-модели открытого доступа. Такой переход ставит перед исследователями, управленцами, библиотекарями и научными издателями из развивающихся стран новые вызовы и задачи, поскольку подписные и публикационные политики этих стран еще только находятся в процессе становления, но уже должны быть оперативно переосмыслены и изменены в соответствии с веяниями Плана S. В этом исследовании на примере публикаций ученых Беларуси и Украины в журналах издательства Elsevier мы попытались оценить приблизительную стоимость и перспективы перехода этих двух стран на открытую модель научной коммуникации. Мы пришли к выводу, что сейчас Беларусь и Украина вкладывают недостаточное количество денег в науку для осуществления перехода на открытую модель. Предложенная нами методика подсчета суммы за публикацию в открытом доступе статей ученых страны может быть использована в процессе подготовки трансформативных соглашений для развивающихся стран.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Plan S; Open Access; Elsevier; Scholarly communication; Transformative agreements; Read & Publish
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BH. Information needs and information requirements analysis.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
Depositing user: Serhii Nazarovets
Date deposited: 23 Dec 2019 13:39
Last modified: 23 Dec 2019 13:39
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39423

References

1. Schiltz M. Why Plan S // https://www.coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/.

2. Principles and Implementation // Website “Science Europe” // https://www.coalition-s.org/principles-and-implementation/.

3. Московкин В. 10 принципов Плана S Евросоюза // Троицкий вариант — Наука. 2018. № 23 (267). С. 5. https://trv-science.ru/2018/11/20/10-principov-plana-s-eu/.

4. Haug C.J. No free lunch. What price Plan S for scientific publishing? // The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. Vol. 380. No 12. P. 1181–1185. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1900864.

5. Brainard J. Scientific societies worry Plan S will make them shutter journals, slash services // Science. 2019. Vol. 365. No 6451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw7718.

6. Spedding M., Barrett J., Morgan E.T., Vore M., Geraghty D., Kirkpatrick C. Plan S: A therat to quality of science? // Science. 2019. Vol. 363. No 6426. P. 462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1424.

7. Guzik T.J., Ahluwalia A. Plan S: in Service or Disservice to Society? // European Heart Journal. 2019. Vol. 40. N 12. P. 949–952. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz065

8. Dal Ré R. Plan S: Funders are committed to open access to scientific publication // European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019. Vol. 49. N6. e13100. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13100.

9. OA2020 and cOAlition S Launch Joint Statement // Website “Science Europe” // https://www.coalition-s.org/oa2020-and-coalition-s/.

10. Schimmer R., Geschuhn K.K., Vogler A. Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access // Max Planck Society. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17617/1.3.

11. Белорусские ученые получили доступ к мировой базе лучших научных публикаций // Веб-портал “Беларусь сегодня” // https://www.sb.by/articles/belorusskie-uchenye-poluchili-dostup-k-mezhdunarodnym-instrumentam.html

12. Лілія Гриневич: Кожен державний виш чи наукова установа зможе підключитися до Scopus та Web of Science за кошти бюджету // Веб-сайт Міністерства освіти і науки України // https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/liliya-grinevich-kozhen-derzhavnij-vish-chi-naukova-ustanova-zmozhe-pidklyuchitisya-do-scopus-ta-web-science-za-koshti-byudzhetu-dostup-zabezpechat-z-1-chervnya

13. UC Drops Elsevier // Website “Inside Higher Ed's News” //

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/03/01/university-california-cancels-deal-elsevier-after-months-negotiations.

14. An Elsevier Pivot to Open Access // Website “Inside Higher Ed's News” // https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/04/24/elsevier-agrees-first-read-and-publish-deal.

15. Nazarovets S. Black Open Access in Ukraine: Analysis of Downloading Sci-Hub Publications by Ukrainian Internet Users // Nauka innov. 2018. Vol. 14. No 2. P. 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin14.02.019.

16. Shvartsman M.E., Lebedev V.V., Skalaban A.V. Sci-Hub as a Mirror of Research and Educational Institutions' Acquisition of E-Resources // Integration of Education. 2017. Vol. 21. No 3. P. 522–534. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.088.021.201703.522-534.

17. WHO Policy on Open Access // Website “World Health Organization” // https://www.who.int/publishing/openaccess/en/.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item