Understanding social and cultural aspects of teachers’ digital competencies

Engen, Bård Ketil Understanding social and cultural aspects of teachers’ digital competencies. Comunicar, 2019, vol. 27, n. 61, pp. 9-19. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Text in English]
Preview
 Text (Text in English)
c6101en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (2MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Texto en español]
Preview
 Text (Texto en español)
c6101es.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (2MB) | Preview

English abstract

Many European governments, including Norway, have ambitious educational policies regarding digitalisation. Many businesses and policymakers pay great attention to the use of digital technologies in education in order to meet the future demands for a competent and qualified workforce. Among researchers and policymakers, there is a general consensus that the professional teacher is a key figure for the successful implementation of digital technologies in schools. Many expectations have been placed upon professional teachers regarding the implementation and use of digital technologies. The professional teacher is, to a certain degree, supposed to independently decide how digital technologies should be used in the classroom. This paper discusses what the concept of a ‘professional digitally competent teacher’ may mean in the context of schools. It also argues the need for a greater understanding of professional digital competence, one which takes into consideration various social and cultural aspects with regard to technology, schools and the teaching profession. In unpacking the social and cultural conditions for implementing technology in a professional teaching context, I will draw on concepts from the constructivist understanding of technology, namely, the ‘domestication of technology’.

Spanish abstract

Muchos gobiernos europeos, incluido el de Noruega, tienen políticas educativas ambiciosas en materia de digitalización. Muchas empresas y responsables políticos prestan gran atención al uso de las tecnologías digitales en la educación para satisfacer la futura demanda de una mano de obra competente y cualificada. Entre los investigadores y los legisladores, existe un consenso general al considerar a los docentes profesionales como una figura clave para la aplicación con éxito de las TIC en la escuela, en lo referente a su implementación y su uso, y se han depositado muchas expectativas en ellos. Se supone que el docente profesional debe, hasta cierto punto, decidir de manera autónoma cómo se han de utilizar estas tecnologías digitales en el aula. Este artículo analiza lo que puede significar el concepto de «docente profesional digitalmente competente» en el contexto de la escuela. También argumenta sobre la necesidad de una mejor interpretación de la competencia digital profesional, que tenga en cuenta diversos aspectos sociales y culturales en relación con la tecnología, las escuelas y la profesión docente. Al analizar las condiciones sociales y culturales para implementar la tecnología en un contexto de enseñanza profesional, nos basaremos en el enfoque constructivista de la tecnología, en concreto, la «domesticación de la tecnología».

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Cultural values; digital competence; digitalisation; domestication of technology; moral economy; social conditions; teacher professional competence; technology adaption; Valores culturales; competencia digital; digitalización; domesticación tecnológica; economía ética; condiciones sociales; competencia profesional docente; adaptación tecnológica
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2020 08:00
Last modified: 31 Mar 2020 08:11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39432

References

Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2016). Teachers’ information and communication technology competences: A structural approach. Computers & Education, 100, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.002

Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K.J. (Eds.) (2006). Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630397-3

Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining digital literacy – What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2006(4), 263-277. http://bit.ly/2EfsQaF

Caron, A.H., & Caronia, L. (2001). Active users and active objects: The mutual construction of families and communication technologies. Convergence, 7(3), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485650100700305

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7757(02)00019-5

Egea, O.M. (2014). Neoliberalism, education and the integration of ICT in schools. A critical reading. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.810168

Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K.A. (2017). Perceptions of digital competency among student teachers: Contributing to the development of student teachers’ instructional self-efficacy in technology-rich classrooms. Education Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010027

Engen, B.K., Giæver, T.H., & Mifsud, L. (2014). Out of the WILD and into the schools: iPads from a domestication perspective. The Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014, Jacksonville, Florida, United States. http://bit.ly/2JpiSHQ

Engen, B.K., Giæver, T.H., & Mifsud, L. (2018a). ‘It’s a fairy tale’; Using tablets for creating composite texts. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(3), 301-321. http://bit.ly/2JpcUqv

Engen, B.K., Giæver, T.H., & Mifsud, L. (2018b). wearable technologies in the k-12 classroom ?cross? disciplinary possibilities and privacy pitfalls. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(3), 323-341. http://bit.ly/2Yx0aSb

Friesen, N. (2008). Critical theory: Ideology critique and the myths of e-learning. Ubiquity, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/1403922.1386860

Gudmundsdottir, G.B., & Hatlevik, O.E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085

Güne?, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2018). A mixed research-based model for pre-service science teachers' digital literacy: Responses to ‘which beliefs’ and ‘how and why they interact’ questions. Computers & Education, 118, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.012

Habib, L., & Sønneland, A.M. (2010). From alien to domestic? Virtual learning environment use from a domestication perspective. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). http://bit.ly/2Jobz3f

Hammond, M. (2014). Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12033

Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence - An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4

Instefjord, E.J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016

Johannesen, M., Øgrim, L., & Giæver, T.H. (2014). Notion in motion: Teachers’ digital competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4, 300-310. http://bit.ly/2Hocoqn

Jurica, J., & Webb, L. (2016). The use of technology in K-12 classrooms. The Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016, Savannah, GA, United States. http://bit.ly/2EaMMez

Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2013-2-73-87

Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K.L. (2014). What does professional digital competence mean in teacher education? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04), 280-298. http://bit.ly/2HrZJ69

McDonagh, A., & McGarr, O. (2015). Technology leadership or technology somnambulism? Exploring the discourse of integration amongst information and communication technology coordinators. Irish Educational Studies, 34(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2015.1010292

Ministry of Education and Research (Ed.) (2017). Framtid, fornyelse og digitalisering. Digitaliseringsstrategi for grunnopplæringen 2017-2021. http://bit.ly/2LO5nn3

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mun?oz, L.a.L., & Sørensen, K.H. (2015). Consumer, client or citizen? How Norwegian local governments domesticate website technology and configure their users. Information, Communication and Society, 18(7), 733-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993678

Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x

Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3

Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x

Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577949

Silverstone, R. (2006). Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401491

Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401491

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A.D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.864_2.x

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teacher’s perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Ward, K. (2006). The bald guy just ate an orange. Domestication work and home. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Winner, L. (2009). Information Technology and educational amnesia. Policy Futures in Education, 7(6), 587-591. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2009.7.6.587


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS