Archivists as Amici Curiae: Activating Critical Archival Theory to Confront Racialized Surveillance

Botnick, Julie Archivists as Amici Curiae: Activating Critical Archival Theory to Confront Racialized Surveillance. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 2019, vol. 5, pp. 153-172. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 35-Article Text-235-2-10-20190630.pdf]
Preview
 Text
35-Article Text-235-2-10-20190630.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (214kB) | Preview

English abstract

Archivists are uniquely situated to problematize the use and misuse of records in a legal context. But along with the ability to think critically about how records are discussed and employed, archivists have a responsibility to act when records are being used as tools of oppression. This paper serves a dual purpose. First, it contributes to the field of Critical Archival Studies with original analysis and theory around records in legal discourse. It rethinks the 2018 US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. United States through critical examination of four archival frameworks: co-creation and third-party doctrine; the use of documents to control the movements of certain bodies; privacy in record-keeping; and the assumed neutrality of information infrastructure. Second, it moves beyond specific analysis of the particular case, which has already been decided, to provide other archivists with a conceptual and practical roadmap to problematize the status quo usage of records in a legal context. Archivists’ increasingly nuanced conceptions of records and documentation are not cited as technical background or evidence in Supreme Court cases. Active introduction and application of these new theories to the legal field would disrupt broader societal conceptions of records in daily life, expose racism in legal invocations of records and record-keeping, and ultimately serve an emancipatory function. The paper ends with an appeal to archivists to intervene in the dominant narrative around records in legal discourse.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Surveillance, Racism, Fourth Amendment, Co-creation, Migration, Policing
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AZ. None of these, but in this section.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Stuart Lawson
Date deposited: 24 Feb 2020 11:11
Last modified: 24 Feb 2020 11:11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39687

References

American Library Association. 2018. “ALA Honors African Americans Who Fought Library Segregation.” American Libraries, July 3, 2018. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/blogs/the-scoop/ala-honors-african americans-who-fought-library-segregation/.

Anderson, Jane E. 2015. “Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, 769-78. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086 8.64078-3.

Beutin, Lyndsey P. 2017. “Racialization as a Way of Seeing: The Limits of Counter Surveillance and Police Reform.” Surveillance & Society 15 (1): 5-20.

Bondi, Pamela Jo, Amit Agarwal, Denise M. Harle, and Jordan E. Pratt. 2017. “Brief for the States of Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Wyoming as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/16-402-bsac-states-of alabama.pdf.

Brown, Bruce D., Caitlin Vogus, Selina MacLaren, et al. 2017. “Brief Amici Curiae of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 19 Media Organizations in Support of Petitioners.” SCOTUSblog. August 14, 2017. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16402_tsac_reporters_committee_for_freedom_of_the_press.pdf.

Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bunn Jr., Nelson O., John M. Castellano, and Linda Cantoni. 2017. “Amicus Curiae Brief for National District Attorneys Association in Support of Respondent.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/16-402bsac-ndaa.pdf.

Castellano, John. 2017. “Symposium: Justices Poised to Consider, or Reconsider, Fourth Amendment Doctrines as They Assess the Scope of Privacy in a Digital Age.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/08/symposium-justices-poised consider-reconsider-fourth-amendment-doctrines-assess-scope-privacy-digital age/.

Caswell, Michelle, Ricardo Punzalan, and T-Kay Sangwand. 2017. “Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies 1 (2): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.

Chang, Ailsa and Noel King. 2017. “Episode 804: Your Cell Phone's a Snitch.” Produced by NPR. Planet Money. Podcast, MP3 audio, 21:17. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/11/08/562888974/episode-804-your cell-phones-a-snitc.

Crocker, Andrew, Jennifer Lynch, Jamie Williams, et al. 2017. “Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, Brennan Center for Justice, The Constitutions Project, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and National Association of Federal Defenders in Support of Petitioner.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-tsac-EFF.pdf.

Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2012. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.

Ferguson, Andrew G., Harry Sandick, Katharine Szymborski, and Jared Buszin. 2017. “Brief of Scholars of Criminal Procedure and Privacy as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-tsac-Scholars-ofCriminal-Procedure-and-Privacy.pdf.

Fiske, John. 1998. “Surveilling the City: Whiteness, the Black Man and Democratic Totalitarian-ism.” Theory, Culture & Society 15 (2): 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327698015002003.

Gaudette, Marybeth. 2003. “Playing Fair with the Right to Privacy.” Archival Issues 28 (1): 21-34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41102071.pdf.

Gilliland, Anne J. and Sue McKemmish. 2012. “Archival and Recordkeeping Research: Past, Present and Future.” In Research Methods: Information Management, Systems, and Contexts, ed. Kirsty Williamson, 80-112. Prahran: Tilde University Press.

Gilliland, Anne J. 2017. “Archival and Recordkeeping Traditions in the Multiverse and their Importance for Researching Situations and Situating Research.” In Research in the Archival Multiverse, ed. Anne J. Gilliland, Sue McKemmish, and Andrew J. Lau, 31-73. Clayton, Vic: Monash University Publishing.

Haggerty, Kevin D., and Richard V. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280.

Hofmann, Marcia, Kendra Albert, and Andrew D. Selbst. 2017. “Brief of Amici Curiae Data & Society Research Institute and Fifteen Scholars of Technology and Society in Support of Petitioner.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-tsac-data-.pdf.

Howe, Amy. 2017a. “Argument Analysis: Drawing a Line on Privacy for Cellphone Records, but Where?” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/11/argument-analysis-drawing-line-privacy cellphone-records/.

------. 2017b. “Justices to Tackle Cellphone Data Case Next Term.” SCOTUSblog. http:// www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/justices-tackle-cellphone-data-case-next-term/.

Hurley, Chris. 2005. “Parallel Provenance (If These Are Your Records, Where Are Your Stories?).” Archives & Manuscripts 33 (1&2): 110-45; 52-91.

International Council on Archives. 1996. “Code of Ethics.” https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/ICA_1996-09-06_code%20of %20ethics_EN.pdf.

Kayyali, Dia. 2014. “The History of Surveillance and the Black Community.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/02/history-surveillance and-black-community.

Kift, Paula. 2016. “The Color of Surveillance: Government Monitoring of the African American Community, Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology.” Data Pop Alliance (blog), April 8, 2016. http://datapopalliance.org/the-color-of surveillance/.

LaBahn, David. 2017. “Symposium: A Defense of the Doctrine.” SCOTUSblog http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/08/symposium-defense-doctrine/.

Legal Information Institute. 2017. “Carpenter v. United States.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/16-402.

McKemmish, Sue. 1996. “Evidence of Me.” The Australian Library Journal 45 (3): 174- 87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1996.10755757.

Monahan, Torin. 2011. “Surveillance as Cultural Practice.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (4): 495-508.

Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre de, César A. Hidalgo, Michel Verleysen, and Vincent D. Blondel. 2013. “Unique in the Crowd: The Privacy Bounds of Human Mobility.” Scientific Reports 3: 1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01376.

Pew Research Center. 2017. “Mobile Fact Sheet.” Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.

Society of American Archivists. n.d. “SAA Core Values Statement and Code of Ethics.” https://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-core-values-statement-and-code-of ethics.

------. 1993. “Code of Ethics for Archivists and Commentary.” Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 11 (1): 3-20. http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=provenance.

Sungaila, Mary-Christine. 2015. “Amicus Briefs: How to Write Them, When to Ask for Them.” American Bar Association. 2015. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/gpsolo/publications/gp_solo/2015/september october/amicus_briefs_how_write_them_when_ask_them/.

Supreme Court of the United States. 2018. “Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-402_h315.pdf.

Upward, Frank. 2000. “Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond—a Personal Reflection.” Records Management Journal 10 (3): 115-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.

Varco, Michael. 2017. “Brief of Amicus Curiae Michael Varco in Support of Respondent.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/16-402bsac-varco.pdf.

Waxman, Seth P., Jonathan G. Cedarbaum, Catherine M.A. Carroll, Robbie Manhas, and Wilmer Cutler Pickering. 2017. “Brief for Technology Companies as Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party.” SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-ac-technology-companies.pdf.

Willen, Brian, Jack Mellyn, Samuel Dippo, Alex Abdo, and Jameel Jaffer. 2017. “Brief of Technology Experts as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner.” SCOTUSblog. http:// www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16-402-tsac-technology experts.pdf.

“Tell-all telephone.” n.d. Zeit Online. https://www.zeit.de/datenschutz/malte-spitz-data retention.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS