Self-perception about emerging digital skills in Higher Education students

León-Pérez, Francisco and Bas, María-Carmen and Escudero-Nahón, Alexandro Self-perception about emerging digital skills in Higher Education students. Comunicar, 2020, vol. 28, n. 62, pp. 91-101. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text (Research article (Text in English))
c6208en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Research article (Texto en Español))
c6208es.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

The current labor market demands new qualities and knowledge from the recent graduates of universities. This has been called ‘21st century digital skills’ and there is not enough research on the self-perception of students in this regard. The objective of this research was to measure student self-perception about their own 21st century digital skills related to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in Higher Education. A questionnaire was generated and applied to 356 students with the stratified random sampling technique. A principal component analysis was carried out, supported by adequate values of the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient and the Bartlett sphericity test. The data indicate that the students use digital technology in academic projects, primarily; they have a lot of skill when using ICT for information management, to develop critical thinking and to solve problems, as well as to manage mobile devices. However, their self-perception in the use of ICT in teaching classes is low. The results suggest that the students do not believe that the use of ICT in the classroom is useful to develop this kind of emerging digital skills. Instead, they think that carrying out academic projects does strengthen the acquisition and development of such skills in relation to the use of ICT.

Spanish abstract

El mercado laboral actual exige nuevas cualidades y conocimientos a los recién egresados de las universidades, incluidas las habilidades digitales, no existiendo suficientes investigaciones sobre la autopercepción del estudiantado al respecto. El objetivo de esta investigación fue medir la percepción que el estudiantado tiene sobre sus propias habilidades digitales del siglo XXI, en relación con el uso de las tecnologías de la comunicación (TIC) en la Educación Superior. Se generó y aplicó un cuestionario a 356 estudiantes con la técnica de muestreo aleatorio estratificado. Se realizó un análisis de componentes principales avalado por valores adecuados del coeficiente Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin y de la prueba de esfericidad de Barlett. Los datos indican que el estudiantado usa la tecnología digital en proyectos académicos primordialmente, y posee alta habilidad al usar las TIC para la gestión de información, para desarrollar pensamiento crítico y para resolver problemas, así como para manejar dispositivos móviles. Sin embargo, su autopercepción es baja respecto al uso de las TIC en la impartición de clases. Los resultados sugieren que el estudiantado no cree que el uso de las TIC en el aula sea útil para desarrollar este tipo de habilidades digitales emergentes. En cambio, indican que la realización de proyectos académicos sí fortalece la adquisición y desarrollo de tales habilidades en relación con el uso de las TIC.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Emerging digital skills; factorial analysis; principal component analysis; higher education; ICT; survey; self-perception; Habilidades digitales emergentes; análisis factorial; análisis de componentes principales; educación superior; TIC; encuesta; autopercepción
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 03 Apr 2020 19:44
Last modified: 03 Apr 2020 19:44
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39834

References

Alfaki, I.M. (2016). Assessment and dynamic modeling of the size of technology transfer. Knowledge Economy, 7(2), 600-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0231-6

Álvarez, N.S., Najarro, M.M., & Paredes, F.A. (2017). Competencias socioemocionales en la gestión de la empleabilidad de estudiantes universitarios: El estudio de caso de las carreras profesionales de gestión y alta dirección y de derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú en el 2017 (Tesis Doctoral). Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. https://bit.ly/2YHxplr

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. In OECD Education Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

Anderson, J. (2010). ICT Transforming Education: A Regional Guide. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. https://bit.ly/2NyHoHT

Cabero, J., & Marín, V. (2014). Educational possibilities of social networks and group work. University students’ perceptions. [Posibilidades educativas de las redes sociales y el trabajo en grupo. Percepciones de los alumnos universitarios]. Comunicar, 42, 165-172. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-16

Champagne, M.V. (2013). Student use of mobile devices in course evaluation: A longitudinal study. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 19(7), 636-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.834618

Cisco Systems Inc. (Ed.) (2009). Preparar a cada alumno para el siglo XXI. https://bit.ly/2TELMVa

Conchado, A., Carot, J., & Bas, M.C. (2015). Competencies for knowledge management: Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4), 836-855. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0447

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2013). Towards a new end: New pedagogies for deep learning. https://bit.ly/2cDgOY7

Gagne, F. (2009). Building gifts into talents: Detailed overview of the DMGT 2.0. In B. MacFarlane, & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Leading change in gifted education: The festschrift of Dr. Joyce VanTassel-Baska. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. https://bit.ly/2NEq4Bp

Given, L.M. (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Rahmawati, Y., & Ridwan, A. (2017). Developing 21st century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(030008) (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995107

Intel-Microsoft-Cisco Education Taskforce (Ed.) (2009). Transforming Education: Assessing and Teaching 21st Century Skills. https://bit.ly/2NtrTSH

Kaufman, J. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751

Landoni, M., & Diaz, P. (2015). Creativity in collaborative design. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, (pp. 393-394). Glasgow. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2767187

León-Pérez, F., & Escudero-Nahón, A. (2017). Dimensionalidad para medir la implementacio?n de tecnologi?a educativa en la educación superior. https://bit.ly/2zmhj6D

León-Pérez, F., Escudero-Nahón, A., & Bas, M.C. (2019). Instrumentos para medir la habilidad de comunicación: una revisión sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 9(18), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v9i18.414

Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2012). A Non-compensatory approach for the measurement of the quality of life. In F. Maggino, & G. Nuvolati (Eds.), Quality of Life in Italy. Research and Reflections (pp. 27-40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3898-0

Menkhoff, T., Tan, E., Ning, K.H., Hup, T.G., & Pan, G. (2018). Tapping drone technology to acquire 21st century skills: A smart city approach. In 2017 IEEE Smart World, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, (pp. 1-4). San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC.2017.8397571

Milbourne, J., & Bennett, J. (2017). Research projects in physics: A mechanism for teaching ill-structured problem solving. The Physics Teacher, 55(7), 418-421. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5003743

Miller, A., & Dumford, A. (2015). The influence of institutional experiences on the development of creative thinking in arts alumn. Studies in Art Education, 56(2), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2015.11518959

Mohanani, R., Ram, P., Lasisi, A., Ralph, P., & Turhan, B. (2017). Perceptions of creativity in software engineering research and practice. In 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2017, (pp. 210-217). Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.21

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & the PRISMA Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-xers, and millennials: Understanding the 'new students. Educause, 4, 38-47. https://bit.ly/2uKGs8J

Pardue, K., & Morgan, P. (2008). Millennials considered: A new generation. New Approaches, and Implications for Nursing Education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(2), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024776-200803000-00007

Pérez-Mateo, M., Romero, M., & Romeu-Fontanillas, T. (2014). Collaborative construction of a project as a methodology for acquiring digital competences [La construcción colaborativa de proyectos como metodología para adquirir competencias digitales]. Comunicar, 42, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-01

Ramos, G. (2015). México: Políticas prioritarias para fomentar las habilidades y conocimientos de los mexicanos para la productividad y la innovación. https://bit.ly/29dS4ZA

Schwab, K. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. https://bit.ly/2d8uv4W

Simonova, I., & Poulova, P. (2016). Mobile devices and applications enhancing engineering education in ESP. In Proceedings of 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (pp. 163-167). Madrid. https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2016.7444458

Sosu, E.M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a critical thinking disposition scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002

Souza, L., Leão, A., Carmona, V., Ruas, R., Carneiro-da-Cunha, J., & Nassif, V. (2018). A scale proposal for higher education creativity in the classroom. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 16(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.091917

Stana, I. (2017). Measuring creativity. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Building Community: Design Education for a Sustainable Future (pp. 489-494). Oslo, Noruega. https://bit.ly/2TT6bpJ

Van-de-Ven, A., & Ferry, D. (2000). OAI Unit Member Questionnaire. In E.E. Lawler, & S.E. Seashore (Eds.), Measuring and assessing organizations (p. 552). Minneapolis: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392488

Van-Deursen, A., Van-Dijk, J., & Peters, O. (2012). Proposing a survey instrument for measuring operational, formal, information, and strategic internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 827-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.670086

Van-Laar, E., Van-Deursen, A., Van-Dijk, J., & de-Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

Vásquez, M., & Findikoglu, M.N. (2011). ICTs in education: The influence of Modernization in developing countries. In G. Bradley, D. Whitehouse, & G. Singh (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conferences. ICT, Society and Human Beings 2011, Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Democracy, Equity and Social Justice 2011 (pp. 101-108). Roma. https://bit.ly/323HTO2

WBI Development Studies (Ed.) (2007). Building Knowledge Economies. Advanced strategies for development. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6957-9

Wegerif, R., & Mansour, N. (2010). A dialogic approach to technology-enhanced education for the global knowledge society. In M.S. Khine, & I.M. Saleh (Eds.), New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education (pp. 325-339). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_16

Wilkins, K.G., Bernstein, B.L., & Bekki, J.M. (2015). Measuring communication skills: The STEM interpersonal communication skills assessment battery. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(4), 433-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20100

World Economic Forum (Ed.) (2015). New vision for education unlocking the potential of technology. https://bit.ly/1EUgOi8

Yasin, R.M., & Yunus, N.S. (2014). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of creativity approaches in technology and engineering education. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n3p242

Yong, E. (2016). Student mobile device use and its inclusion into classroom: A preliminary investigation. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 568-575. https://bit.ly/2Zuob0m


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item