Using Text Surrounding Method to Enhance Retrieval of Online Images by Google Search Engine

Rahimi, Saleh and Keshavarz, Hamid and Khademian, Mahdi Using Text Surrounding Method to Enhance Retrieval of Online Images by Google Search Engine. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 2018, vol. 9, n. 4, pp. 83-104. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text
Hamid Keshavarz- Using Text Surrounding Method to Enhance Retrieval.pdf - Published version
Download (612kB) | Preview

English abstract

Purpose: the current research aimed to compare the effectiveness of various tags and codes for retrieving images from the Google. Design/methodology: selected images with different characteristics in a registered domain were carefully studied. The exception was that special conceptual features have been apportioned for each group of images separately. In this regard, each image group surrounding texts was dissimilar. Images were allocated with captionsincluding language in Farsi and English, alt text, image title, file name, free and controlled languages and appropriation text to images properties. Findings: allocating texts to images on a website causes Google to retrieve more images. Chi-square test for identification of significant differences among retrieved images in 5 Codes and revealed that in different codes, various numbers of images that were retrieved were significantly different. Caption allocation in English proved to have the best effect in retrieving images in the study sample, whereas file name had less effect in image retrieval ranking. Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test to assess the group differences in 5 codes revealed that differences were significant. Originality/Value: This paper tries to recall the importance of some elements which a search engine like Google may consider in indexing and retrieval of images. Widespread use of image tagging on the web enables Google and also other search engines to successfully retrieve images.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Image indexing, image retrieval, semantic image retrieval, image tagging, Google, image annotation.
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HH. Audio-visual, Multimedia.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HI. Electronic Media.
I. Information treatment for information services > IB. Content analysis (A and I, class.)
I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes.
I. Information treatment for information services > IH. Image systems.
Depositing user: Hamid Keshavarz
Date deposited: 05 Apr 2020 12:01
Last modified: 05 Apr 2020 12:01
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39859

References

Ayache, S., Quenot, G. & Satoh, S. (2006). Context-Based Conceptual Image Indexing. ICASSP. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE.

Azzam, I.A.A., Leung, C.H.C. & Horwood, J.F. (2004). Implicit Concept-based Image Indexing and Retrieval," Multi-Media Modeling Conference, International, pp. 354, 10th International Multimedia Modelling Conference.

Bar-Ilan, J., M. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Y. Miller, & S. Shoham. (2012). Tag-based retrieval of images through different interfaces –a user study. Online Information Review, 36(5): 739-757.

Barnard, K. and Forsyth, D. (2001). Learning the Semantics of Words and Pictures. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2: 408-415.

Booth, P.F. (2001). Indexing: The manual of good practice. Munich: K. G. Saur. Chen, H-L. & Rasmussen, E. (1999). Intellectual Access to Images. Library Trennds, 48(2): 291-302.

Chu, H. (2001).Research in Image Indexing and Retrieval as Reflected in the Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12):1011-1018.

Collins, K. (1998). Providing Subject Access to Images: A Study of User Queries. The American Archivist, 61: 36-55.

El-Qawasmeh, E. (2003). A quadtree-based representation technique for indexing and retrieval of image databases. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 14(3): 340-357.

Enser, P.G.B. and McGregor, C.G. (1993). Analysis of visual information retrieval queries (6104). London: British Library.

Fadzli, S.A. & Setchi, R. (2012). Concept-based indexing of annotated images using semantic DNA. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(8): 1644–1655.

Fauzi, F. & Belkhatir, M. (2013). Multifaceted conceptual image indexing on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management, 49(2): 420-440.

Jacobs, C. (1999). If a picture is worth a thousand words, then…. The Indexer, 21 (3): 119-121.

Jayaratne, L. (2006). Enhancing retrieval of images on the web through effective use of associated text and semantics from low-level image features. PhD Dissertation, School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney.

Jung, K., Kim, K.I. & Jain, A.K. (2004). Text Information Extraction in Images and Video: A Survey. Pattern Recognition, 37: 977-997.

Kokabi, Morteza, Rahimi, Saleh, Osareh, Farideh, Noruzi, Alireza (2013). Perspectives on image indexing: A picture is worth a thousand words. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 19(2), 257-276. (in Persian)

Krause, M.G. (1988). Intellectual problems of indexing picture collections. Audiovisual Librarian, 14(4): 73-81.

Layne, S. S. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture. A theoretical approach. Cataloging and classification quarterly, 6(3): 39-52.

Lee, H.J. and Neal, D. (2010). A new model for semantic photograph description combining basic levels and user-assigned descriptors. Journal of Information Science, 36(5): 547-565.

Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive, Information Retrieval, 1(4): 259-285.

Matusiak, K.K. (2006). Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections. OCLC Systems and Services: International digital library perspectives, 22(4): 283-298.

Ménard, E. (2007). Image Indexing: How Can I Find a Nice Pair of Italian Shoes? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 34(1), 21-25.

Ménard, E. (2010). Ordinary image retrieval in a multilingual context. A comparison of two indexing vocabularies. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 62(4/5): 428-437.

Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the Visual Arts, Anchor, NewYork, NY. 104 Using Text Surrounding Method …

Patil, R, C and Durugkar, S. R (2015). Content Based Image Re-ranking using Indexing Methods, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 5(8): 447-453.

Powell RR. (1997). Basic research methods for librarians. 3rd ed. Greenich, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Roberts, H.E. (2001). A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Art Indexing in Electronic Databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(11): 911–916.

Rorissa, A. (2008). User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images: A comparison using basic level theory. Information Processing and Management. 44: 1741–1753.

Setchi, R. Tang, Q. & Stankov, I. (2011). Semantic-based information retrieval in support of concept design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(2): 131-146.

Smits, G., Plu, M. and Bellec, P. (2006). Personal Semantic Indexation of Images Using Textual Annotations. SAMT, LNCS 4306, 71–85.

Stephen, C. (2009). From print to web: indexing for accessibility. The Indexer, 27(2): 76-79.

Svenonius, E. (1994). Access to Nonbook Materials: The Limits of Subject Indexing for Visual and Aural Languages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8): 600-606.

Vadivel, A., Sural, S. & Majumdar, A.K. (2009). Image retrieval from the web using multiple features. Online Information Review, 33(6): 1169-1188.

Vrochidis, S., Moumtzidou, A. & Kompatsiaris, I. (2012). Concept-based patent image retrieval. World Patent Information, 34(4): 292–303.

Westerveld, T.H.W. (2000). Image Retrieval: Content versus Context. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Context-Based Multimedia Information Access, RIAO. 276-284.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS