Bibliographic Relationships among Iranian Musical Bibliographic Entities from FRBR Perspective

Vaziri Bozorg, RoghayeSadat, Noruzi, Alireza and Fadaie, Gholamreza Bibliographic Relationships among Iranian Musical Bibliographic Entities from FRBR Perspective. Library and Information Science Research, 2020, vol. 9, n. 2, pp. 242-266. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of FRBR.Music.pdf]
Preview
Text
FRBR.Music.pdf

Download (957kB) | Preview

English abstract

Introduction: Music Information Retrieval (MIR) involves searching and organizing large collection of music information and requires a conceptual model for bibliographic relationships in various works. Bibliographic relationships define all relationships involved in cataloging bibliographic units. The purpose of this research is to study the characteristics of Iranian musical bibliographic records by analyzing their work-to-work relationships based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model. Methodology: This study uses a quantitative approach and practical method in order to analysis bibliographic data. The research method is a descriptive survey. The statistical population includes all Iranian musical bibliographic records available in the OPAC of the National Library of Iran from 2011 to 2018 and includes 1367 records for musical works. Data gathering method includes structural observation and documentary method and data gathering tool is a check list. The bibliographic relationships among records are studied according to the table of work-to-work relationships noted in IFLA final report. Findings: Of 1367 bibliographic records that belong to musical works, 320 (23/4%) have work-to-work bibliographic relationships. The highest percentage of work-to-work relationships consists of 304 (95%) adaptive relationships and 16 (5%) complementary relationships. Other work-to-work relationships such as supplement, succession, transformation, summarization and imitation ones do not exist among Iranian musical works. The distribution of relationships in referential and autonomous works consists of adaptation with 301 (94.69%), incidental music with 16 (5%), fantasy with 2 (0.62%) and variation with 1 (0.31%). The rest of the sub-relationships types, as well as main relationships are not seen among the musical works. Conclusion: The high percentage of Iranian musical works recorded in the National Library of Iran includes traditional Persian music and principal musical modal systems (Dastgah) which, cannot be traced in the features of the international music. Therefore, sub-relationships such as variation, harmonization, cadenza, libretto (operas), etc., as defined in the IFLA report for bibliographic relationships of a work were not mentioned among such musical compositions based on Dastgah music. Most of Iranian musical works are adapted from poetry and lyrics. The distribution of bibliographic relationships among Iranian musical works is only in two adaptation and complement types. Sub-relationships like Cadenza, Libretto, Choreography, Variation, Harmonization and Fantasy, unique to musical works does not exist in most of existing Iranian musical works. Hence, considering the significant difference between Iranian musical works and international musical works, using of FRBR for Iranian musical works in work-to-work relationships is not economically benefit.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Bibliographic relationships, Work-to-work relationships, Musical works, Music, Iran
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > IA. Cataloging, bibliographic control.
Depositing user: Dr. Alireza Noruzi
Date deposited: 04 Apr 2020 14:29
Last modified: 04 Apr 2020 14:29
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39872

References

Arastoopoor, S., & Fattahi, R. (2009). Identification and Categorization of related works in the Persian Bibliographic Universe: a FRBR Approach. Paper presented at World library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Council, Milan, Italy, 23-27. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228374671_Identification_and_Categorization_of_Related_Works_in_the_Persian_Bbibliographic_Universe_An_FRBR_Approach

Arsenault, C., & Noruzi, A. (2011). Work-to-work bibliographic relationships from FRBR point of view: A Canadian perspective. CAIS/ACSI 2011, 39th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science, “Exploring Interactions of People, Places and Information”, Fredericton (N-B), 2-4 June 2011.

Arsenault, C., & Noruzi, A. (2012). Analysis of work-to-work bibliographic relationships through FRBR: A Canadian perspective. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50 (5-7), 641-652.

Ayres, M. L. (2003). MusicAustralia: Experiments with DC.relation: a paper by Dr Marie-Louise Ayers, Project Manager, MusicAustralia, National Library of Australia, at the DC-ANZ Conference in Canberra, February 2003. Available at: http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/2003/ayres1.html

Brenne, M. (2004). Storage and retrieval of musical documents in a FRBR-based library catalogue - a comparison with the traditional databases in libraries today. Master thesis, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science, Oslo University College.

Coyle, K. (2004). Future considerations: The functional library systems record. Library Hi Tech, 22(2), 166-174.

Cronquist, M. (2004). Faceted Subject Access to Music: An Evaluation of the Music Thesaurus Project. (Master’s thesis). Available from School of Information and Library Science of the University of North Carolina. Available at: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/record/uuid:a6b73f53-89f7-411f-b73b-aad0fd012f40

Futrelle, J., & Downie, J. S. (2003). Interdisciplinary communities and research Issues in Music information Retrieval. Journals of New Music Research.32 (2), 121-131.

Hankinson, A. (2006). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Building Relationships for Music Information Retrieval. Format: ppt. McGill University.

IFLA final report. (1998). IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Final Report. K. G. Saur, 1998. UBCIM Publication, New Series; V.

LeBoeuf, P. (2005). FRBR: Hype or cure-all? Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.

Mayernik, M. (2007). Bibliographic Relationships and FRBR in Online Catalog Collocation. Master of Library and Information Science, University of California. Los Angeles.

Mohammadi, M., Ghazi Mir Saeed, S. J., & Noruzi, A. (2013). Work-to-work bibliographic relationships in medical subject areas based on functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) during 2006-2010. Payavard Salamat, 7(4), 366-375.

Noruzi, A. (2012). FRBR and Tillett's Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships. Knowledge Organization, 39(6), 409-416.

Noruzi, A., & Arsenault, C. (2013). Educational supplementary bibliographic relationships from FRBR point of view: A Canadian case study. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 37(1-2), 66-72.

Riley, J. (2008). Application of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) to Music. Ismir Philadelphia: Drexel University, 439-444.

Taniguchi, S. (2003). Conceptual modeling of component parts of bibliographic resources in cataloging. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 692-708.

Tillett, B. (1987). Bibliographic relationships: Toward a Conceptual Structure of Bibliographic Information Used in Cataloging. (Doctoral dissertation). School of Library and Information Science, University of California, Los Angeles.

Tillett,.B. (2005). Relationships in FRBR. FRBR Workshop. Dublin, Ohio. Available at: http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprajects/frbr/frbr-workshop/presentations/Tillett/FRBR-Relationships.ppt

Vellucci, S. L. (2007). FRBR and music. In A. G. Taylor (Ed.), Understanding FRBR: What it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (pp. 131-152). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item