Comparing use terms in a Spanish and US research university e-journal licenses: recent trends

Fernández-Molina, J.C. and Eschenfelder, K.R. and Rubel, A. Comparing use terms in a Spanish and US research university e-journal licenses: recent trends., 2020 [Preprint]

FernándezMolina-Eschenfelder-Rubel-CRL-2020.pdf - Accepted version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (393kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper describes the results of a study to compare contemporary e-journal licenses from two research universities in the United States and Spain in terms of e-reserves, interlibrary loan, text and data mining, authors´ rights and treatment of copyright exceptions, usage statistics, governing law, data privacy, and obligations entailing security. The data include a higher proportion of scholarly society and academic press publishers than earlier license analyses. This analysis compares license terms over time, across publisher types and between the two libraries, and it compares findings with recommendations from model licenses. The results show progress toward model license goals in some areas, but deficiencies in others including self-archiving, usage statistics clauses, and clauses related to e-resource data privacy and library security and disciplinary obligations. Our findings also raise questions about international ILL and governing venue clauses in library licenses outside the North American context.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: e-journals; licensing; academic libraries; copyright; US; Spain
Subjects: D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft, open access.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JB. Serials management.
Depositing user: Juan-Carlos Fernández-Molina
Date deposited: 01 Jun 2020 06:56
Last modified: 01 Jun 2020 06:56


1. Mark A. Lemley, “Beyond Preemption: The Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing,” California Law Review 40, no 1 (1999): 111–172,; Lucie Guibault, Copyright Limitations and Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002); Philippa Davies, “Access v Contract: Competing Freedoms in the Context of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries,” European Intellectual Property Review 35, no 7 (2013): 402-414; D. R. Jones, “Locked Collections: Copyright and the Future of Research Support,” Law Library Journal 105, no 4 (2013): 425-460.

2. Kristin R. Eschenfelder, Tien-I Tsai, Xiaohua Zhu, and Brenton Stewart, “How Institutionalized Are Model License Use Terms: An Analysis of E-Journal License Use Rights Clauses from 2000–2009,” College and Research Libraries 74, no 4 (2013): 326-355,

3. California Digital Library Standard License Agreement, available online at [accessed 20 January 2020]; Liblicense Model License Agreement with Commentary (revised November 2014), available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

4. Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon, “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era,“ PLoS ONE 10, no 6 (2015): e0127502,

5. David R. Hansen, William M. Cross, and Phillip M. Edwards, “Copyright Policy and Practice in Electronic Reserves among ARL Libraries,” College and Research Libraries 74, no 1 (2013): 69-84,

6. Eschenfelder et al., “How Institutionalized,”

7. Kurt Munson, “Herding Cats: Challenges in Interlibrary Loan Lending of E-Journal Articles,” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve 22, no 3-4 (2012): 163–173,

8. Karen Okamoto, “Licensed to Share: How Libraries Are Handling Electronic Journal Article Requests,” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve 22, no 3-4 (2012): 137–154,

9. Lynn N. Wiley, “License to Deny? Publisher Restrictions on Document Delivery from E-Licensed Journals,” Interlending & Document Supply 32, no 2 (2004): 94–102,

10. Selden Durgom Lamoureux and James Stemper, “White Paper: Trends in Licensing.” Research Library Issues: A Quarterly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 275 (2011): 19–24,

11. Robert Tiessen, “How Copyright Affects Interlibrary Loan and Electronic Resources in Canada,” Interlending & Document Supply 40, no. 1 (2012): 49-54,

12. Eschenfelder et al., “How Institutionalized,”

13. Andrée J. Rathemacher, “Developing Issues in Licensing: Text Mining, MOOCs, and More,” Serials Review 39, no 3 (2013): 205–210, doi: 10.1080/00987913.2013.10766397; Leslie A. Williams, Lynne M. Fox, Christophe Roeder, and Lawrence Hunter, “Negotiating a Text Mining License for Faculty Researchers,” Information Technology and Libraries 33, no 3 (2014): 5–21,; Megan Senseney, Elanor Dickson, Beth Namachchivaya, and Bertram Ludäscher, “Data Mining Research with In-copyright and Use-limited Text Datasets: Preliminary Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Stakeholder Interviews”, Presentation at the 13th International Digital Curation Conference, Barcelona, February 19-22, 2018, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020].

14. Paul Grewal and Kirsten Huhn, “Text & Data Mining Clauses in Academic Library Licenses: A Case Study,” Paper presented at the Concordia University Libraries’ 14th Annual Research Forum, Montreal, April 29th 2016, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

15. Jennifer Chan, Roxanne Peck, and Angela Riggio, “Negotiating Walled Gardens and Digital Playgrounds: Libraries and the World of Licensing for Text and Data Mining,” Panel Discussion at Electronic Resources and Libraries Conference, Austin, TX, April 2-5, 2017, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

16. Ellen Duranceau and Ivy Anderson, “Author-Rights Language in Library Content Licenses,” Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 263, 33–37, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]; Birgit Schmidt and Kathleen Shearer, “Licensing Revisited: Open Access Clauses in Practice,” Liber Quarterly 22, no 3 (2012): 176–189,; Stephen Buck, “Role of Library’s Subscription Licenses in Promoting Open Access to Scientific Research,” Presentation at the Second KAUST Library Saudi Seminar, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia, April 29-30, 2018, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

17. Arvind Kumar Singh and Bhaskar Mukherjee, “Electronic Information Resource Optimisation in Academic Libraries: A Comparative Study on Licensing Provision of Commercial Publisher,” DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 38, no. 3 (2018): 213-220, doi: 10.14429/djlit.38.3.12468

18. Alan Rubel and Mei Zhang, “Four Facets of Privacy and Intellectual Freedom in Licensing Contracts for Electronic Journals,” College & Research Libraries 76, no 4 (2015): 427-449,

19. Claire Dygert and Jeanne M. Langendorfer, “Fundamentals of E-Resource Licensing,” The Serials Librarian 66, no 1-4 (2014): 289-297,; Claire Dygert and Robert Van Rennes, “Building Your Licensing and Negotiation Skills Toolkit,” The Serials Librarian 68, no 1-4 (2015): 17-25,; Claire Dygert and Heather Barrett, “Building Your Licensing and Negotiation Skills Toolkit,” The Serials Librarian 70, no 1-4 (2016): 333-342,

20. Trina J. Magi, “A Content Analysis of Library Vendor Privacy Policies: Do They Meet Our Standards?” College & Research Libraries 71, no 3 (2010): 254–272,

21. Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,” 439.

22. Ibid., 437.

23. Eschenfelder et al., “How Institutionalized,”; Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,”

24. Eschenfelder et al., “How Institutionalized,”

25. Ibid., 342.

26. Ibid., 340.

27. Grewal and Huhn, “Text & Data Mining,”

28. European Union, Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

29. Singh and Mukherjee, “Electronic Information Resource,”

30. Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,”

31. Tomas A. Lipinski, The Librarian’s Legal Companion for Licensing Information Resources and Services (Chicago: American Library Association, 2013), 615.

32. Sharon Johnson, with Ole Gunnar Evensen, Julia Gelfand, Glenda Lammers, Lynn Sipe and Nadia Zilper, “Key Issues for E-Resource Collection Development: A Guide for Libraries,” (2012), available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

33. Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,”

34. Ibid., 437.

35. Ibid.

36. Alan Rubel, “Libraries, Electronic Resources, and Privacy: The Case for Positive Intellectual Freedom,” The Library Quarterly 84, no 2 (2014): 183-208,

37. Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,”

37. Kate Hill and Tessa Minchew, “Into the Great Wide Open: Licensing, Vendor Relations and Security in Interesting Times,” Presentation at Electronic Resources and Libraries Conference, Austin, TX, March 24-7, 2018, available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]

38. Magi, “A Content Analysis,”

39. Rubel and Zhang, “Four Facets,”

40. Rubel, “Libraries, Electronic Resources,”

41. Lipinski, The Librarian’s Legal Companion, 448.

42. Ibid., 451.

43. Hansen et al., “Copyright Policy,”

44. IFLA Licensing Principles (2001), available online at [accessed 20 January 2020]; Beaubien, A.K.; Christensen, M.; Kuehn, J.; Larsen, D.K.; Lahane, M., “White Paper: International Library Loan,” Research Library Issues: A Quarterly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 275 (2011): 7-14,

45. Dick Kawooya, Amber Veverka, and Tomas Lipinski, “The Copyright Librarian: A Study of Advertising Trends for the Period 2006–2013,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 43, no. 3 (2015): 341-349,

46. Xiaohua Zhu, “Driven Adaptation: A Grounded Theory Study of Licensing Electronic Resources,” Library & Information Science Research 38, no 1 (2016): 69–80,

47. Svetlana Yakovleva, “Literature Review on the Use of Licenses in Library Context, and the Limitations this Creates to Access to Knowledge”, (2017), available online at [accessed 20 February 2020]


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item