Theory of mental scheme in the study of the evolution of book as a publication genre

Nahotko, Marek Theory of mental scheme in the study of the evolution of book as a publication genre. Bibliotheca Nostra, 2017, n. 2, pp. 10-27. [Journal article (Paginated)]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
 Text
nahotko-ostateczny.pdf
Download (7MB) | Preview

English abstract

In recent years, electronic publishing has been rapidly expanding. Most genres of publications, including books, become digital genres (cybergenres). This raises questions about the future of publishing, in particular, the question of whether new cybergenres will replace traditional genres, or rather hybridization of publishing will take place; they are questions about relations between old and new genres. In the paper the theory of publication genres has been used to find answers to these questions. Genres are treated as mental schemata which conceptual content can be represented by a frame. By applying the frames model it is possible to present a concept representation in the mind, including the concept of a book. The mechanisms that allow for the evolution of schemata are important because they are used to make changes in the genres of texts. In this article it is dealt with the changes that occur in text genres, mostly books, as a result of the use of new publishing technologies. They are described from the side of individual mental processes taking place in the minds of communicating persons.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: mental schemata; text genres; electronic books; frames theory
Subjects: F. Management. > FJ. Knowledge management
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HO. e-books.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
Depositing user: prof. Marek Nahotko
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2020 07:06
Last modified: 16 Sep 2020 07:06
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40461

Available Versions of this Item

References

Aarseth, E. (2014). Cybertekst. Spojrzenie na literaturę ergodyczną. Kraków, Bydgoszcz: Korporacja Ha!art.

Andersen, J. (2008). The concept of genre in information studies. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 42(1), 339-367.

Andersen, H., Barker, P., Chen, X. (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Anderson, R. (1977). Schema-directed process in language comprehension. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois.

Anderson, R., Pearson, D. (1988). A schema-theoretic view of basic progress in reading comprehension. In: P. Carrell, J. Devine, D. Eskey (ed.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37–55). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bardi, A., Manghi, P. (2014). Enhanced publications: data models and information systems. LIBER Quarterly, 23(4), 240-273.

Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. W: N. Urloc (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bateson, G. (1996). Umysł i przyroda. Jedność konieczna. Warszawa: PIW.

Bazerman, Ch. (1998). Shaping written knowledge. The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: The Univ. of Wisconsin Press.

Carley, K., Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636.

Chartier, R. (2004). Languages, books, and reading from the printed word to digital text. Critical Inquiry, 31(4), 133-152.

Chen, X., Andersen, H., Barker, P. (1998). Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions and cognitive psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 11(1), 5-28.

Gajda, S. (2009). Gatunki wypowiedzi i genologia. W: Z. Bilut-Homplewicz, W. Czachura, M. Smykała (red.), Lingwistyka tekstu w Polsce i w Niemczech. Pojęcia, problemy, perspektywy (s. 135-146). Wrocław: ATUT.

Guedon, J.-C. (1994). Why are electronic publications difficult to classify? The orthogonality of print and digital media. In: A. Okerson (red.) ARL Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and Academic Discussion Lists (s. 17-22). Washington: Assoc. of Research Libraries.

Hjørland, B. (2015). Theories are Knowledge Organizing Systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization, 42(2), 113-128.

Kircz, J. (2001). New practices for electronic publishing. 1: Will the scientific paper keep its form? Learned Publishing, 14(4), 265-272.

Kotuła, S. (2013). Komunikacja bibliologiczna wobec World Wide Web. Lublin: Wydaw. UMCS.

Kotuła, S. (2017). Wykorzystanie schematu książki na potrzeby środowiska cyfrowego. Folia Bibliologica, 58, 149-157.

McClelland, J., Rogers, T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(4), 310-322.

Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167.

Nahotko, M. (2014). Komunikacja naukowa jako proces organizacji wiedzy i informacji. W: A. Korycińska-Huras, M. Janiak (red.), Komunikacja naukowa w środowisku cyfrowym. Badania, zasoby, użytkownicy (s. 14-52). Warszawa: Wydaw. SBP.

Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. London, New York: Harcourt.

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328-350.

Rumelhart, D., Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In: R. Anderson, R. Spiro, W. Montague (ed.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-135). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Seeber, K. (2015). Teaching “format as a process” in an era of Web-scale discovery. Reference Services Review, 43(1), 19-30.

Shepherd, M., Watters, C. (1998). The evolution of cybergenres. In: Proc. of the 31st Annual Hawaii Intern. Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’98) (s. 97-109). Los Alamos: IEEE Press.

Taylor, J. (2007). Gramatyka kognitywna. Kraków: Universitas.

Vaughan, M., Dillon, A. (1998). The role of genre in shaping our understanding of digital documents. In: Proc. of the 61st ASIS Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science,35 (s. 559-566). Medford: Information Today Inc.

Wittgeinstein, L. (1972). Dociekania filozoficzne. Warszawa: PWN.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS