OPAC development as the genre transition process. Part II: OPAC genre analysis

Nahotko, Marek OPAC development as the genre transition process. Part II: OPAC genre analysis. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2020, vol. 67, n. 3, pp. 164-172. [Journal article (Paginated)]


Download (308kB) | Preview

English abstract

The purpose is to present library OPAC as a communication genre in its mutability. The paper is based on the idea of OPAC development as a transition to subsequent OPAC generations. Every generation, in the light of genre theory, can be treated as a subgenre with its own communication purpose. As such, it is subject to transformations caused by information technology development. OPAC development is described as an electronic genre transition process, which allows for distinguishing eight OPAC subgenre generations. They were distinguished based on socio-historical development of the genre system and were described according to Shepherd and Watters1genre development model. These subgenres are then subjected to genres analysis revealing their basic characteristics (purpose, form and functionality).

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: OPAC generations; OPAC development; communication genres; genre analysis
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
L. Information technology and library technology > LD. Computers.
L. Information technology and library technology > LR. OPAC systems.
Depositing user: prof. Marek Nahotko
Date deposited: 16 Oct 2020 22:54
Last modified: 16 Oct 2020 22:54
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40559


1. Shepherd M and Watters C, The evolution of cybergenres. In Proc. of the 31st Annual Hawaii Intern. Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’98), (IEEE Press; Los Alamos), 1998, p. 97-109.

2. Andersen J, The concept of genre in information studies, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42 (1) (2008) 339-367.

3. Andersen J, Genre, organized knowledge and communicative action in digital culture. In: Andersen J and Skouvig L, (eds.) The organization of knowledge: caught between global structures and local meaning, (Emerald Group Publ.; Bingley), 2017, p. 1-16.

4. Harper R and Sandis C, Wittgenstein and communication technology – a conversation between Richard Harper and Constantine Sandis. Philosophical Investigations, 41 (2) (2018) 241-262.

5. Savolainen R, Pioneering models for information interaction in the context of information seeking and retrieval, Journal of Documentation, 74 (5) (2018) 966-986.

6. Latham K, Experiencing documents, Journal of Documentation, 70 (4) (2014) 544-561.

7. Bazerman Ch, Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: how texts organize activity and people. In: Bazerman Ch and Prior P, (eds.) What writing does and how it does it. An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, (Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.; Mahwah), 2004, p. 309-340.

8. Loewe I, Gatunki paratekstowe w komunikacji medialnej, (SilesianUniv. Press; Katowice), 2007.

9. Sandy H, Explaining cataloging to a six year old? Technical Services Quarterly, 36 (4) (2019) 379-390.

10. Miller C, Genre as social action, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70 (2) (1984) 151-167.

11. Isenberg H, Probleme der Texttypologie, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig, 27 (5) (1978) 565-579.

12. Franke W, Texttypen – Textsorten – Textexemplare, ZeitschriftfürgermanisticheLinguistik, 15 (3) (1987) 263-281.

13. Bakhtin M, Speech genres and other late essays, (Univ. of Texas Press; Austin), 1986.

14. Kwaśnik B and Crowston K, Introduction to the special issue. Genres of digital documents, Information Technology & People, 18 (2) (2005) 76-88.

15. Gajda S, Gatunki wypowiedzi i genologia. In: Bilut-Homplewicz Z, Czachura W and Smykała M, (eds.) Lingwistyka tekstu w Polsce i w Niemczech. Pojęcia, problemy, perspektywy, (Oficyna Wydaw. ATUT; Wrocław), 2009, p. 135-146.

16. Swales J, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, (Cambridge Univ. Press; New York), 1990.

1.7 Luckmann T, Grundformen der gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung des Wissens: Komunikative Gattungen, Kölner Zeitschriftfür Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 27 (Sonderhefte) (1986) 191-211.

18. Skouvig L and Andersen J, Understanding information history from a genre-theoretical perspective, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (10) (2015) 2061-2010.

19. Skouvig L, Genres of war: informing a city. In: J. Andersen(ed.) Genre theory in information studies, (Emerald Group Publ.; Bingley), 2015.

20. Bazerman Ch, The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information, Archival Science, 12 (4) (2012) 377-388.

21. Xie I, Interactive information retrieval in digital environments, (IGI Publ.; Hersley, New York), 2008.

22. Bakhtin M, Forms of time and of the chropotope in the novel. In: Holquist M, (ed.) The dialogic imagination. Four essays, (Univ. of Texas Press; Austin), 1981, p. 84-258.

23. Keunen B, Bakhtin, genre formation, and the cognitive turn: chronotopes as memory schemata, CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture,2 (2) (2000) art. 2. Available at http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol2/iss2/2/ (Accessed on 12 Nov 2019).

24. Im H, Yates J and Orlikowski W, Temporal coordination through communication: using genres in a virtual start-up organization, Information Technology & People,18 (2) (2005) 89-119.

25. Russell L, Defining moments. Genre beginnings, genre invention, and the case of the English-language dictionary, In: Reiff M and Bawarshi A, (eds.) Genre and the performance of publics, (Utah State Univ. Press; Boulder), 2016, p. 83-99.

26. Giddens A, The construction of society: outline of the theory of structuration, (Univ. of California Press; Berkeley), 1984.

27. Hyland K and Salager-Meyer F, Scientific writing, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42 (1) (2008) 297-338.

28. Askehave I and Swales J, Genre identification and communicative purpose: a problem and a possible solution, Applied Linguistics, 22 (2) (2001) 195-212.

29. Yates J and Orlikowski W, Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media, The Academy of Management Review,17 (2) (1992) 299-326.

30. Crowston K and Williams M, Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web, The Information Society, 16 (3) (2000) 201-215.

31. Yates J, Orlikowski W and Rennecker J, Collaborative genres for collaboration: Genre systems in digital media, In: Proc. of the 13th Annual Hawaii Intern. Conference on System Sciences (HICCS 30), Wailea, HA, (IEEE; Washington), 1997, p. 50-59.

32. Shepherd M and Watters C, The functionality attribute of cybergenres. In: Proc. of the 32nd Hawaii Intern. Conference on System Science, Manui, Hawaii, January 5-8, 1999, (IEEE; Washington), 1999, p. 2007-2015.

33. Ljungberg J, Combining Actor Network Theory and genre theory to understand the evolution of digital genres, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 8 (20) (2008). Available at http://sprouts.aisnet.org/8-20 (Accessed on 25 Nov 2019).

34. Shepherd M, Watters C and Kennedy A, Cybergenre: automatic identification of home pages on the Web, Journal of Web Engineering, 3 (3/4) (2004) 236-251.

35. Orlikowski W and Yates J, Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (4) (1994) 541-574.

36. Santini M, Characterizing genres of Web pages: genre hybridism and individualization. In: Proc. of the 40th Hawaii Intern. Conference on System Sciences(HICSS’07). (IEEE; Washington), 2007, p. 71.

37. Artemeva N, Key concepts in rhetorical genre studies: an overview, Technostyle, 20 (1) (2004) 3-38.

38. Geisler Ch. et al. IText. Future directions for research on the relationship between information technology and writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15 (3) (2001) 269-308.

39. Library of Congress new bibliographic framework initiative: update forum with Eric Miller. Available at https://www.loc. gov/item/webcast-5605/ (Accessed on 22 Nov 2019).

40. Star S, This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35 (5) (2010) 601-617.

41. Smith P, Newman I and Parks L, Virtual hierarchies and virtual networks: some lessons from hypermedia usability research applied to the World Wide Web, International. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47 (1) (1997) 67-95.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item