El autor de correspondencia en estudios métricos de la información: un análisis de la coautoría en Journal of informetrics

Beaver, D. & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration part I: the professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.

Bhandari, M., Guyatt, G. H., Kulkarni, A. V., Devereaux, P. J., Leece, P., Bajammal, S., ..., & Busse, J. W. (2014). Perceptions of authors' contributions are influenced by both by line order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67(9), 1049-1054.

Bordons, M., González-Albo, B., Aparicio, J. & Moreno, L. (2014).The influence of R&D intensity of countries onthe impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1385-1400.

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Larivière, V., Costas, R., Robinson-García, N. & Sugimoto, C. (2018). Building tiesacross countries: International collaboration, field specialization, and global leadership. In 23th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, STI2018. Leiden,The Netherlands.

Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Sugimoto, C. & Larivière, V. (2019). Follow the leader: on the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations. PLoS ONE, 14(6), e0218309.

Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shi in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7),558-569.

Duffy, M. A. (2017). Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology. Ecology and evolution, 7(21), 8876–8887.

Fox, C. W., Ritchey, J. P. & Paine, C. E. T. (2018). Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, andcorresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecology and evolution, 8(2), 11492-11507.

Frandsen, T. F. & Nicolaisen, J. (2010). What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines. Journalof informetrics, 4 (4), 608–617.

González-Alcaide, G., Park, J.; Huamaní, C. & Ramos, J. M. (2017). Dominance and leadership in research activities:Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order anddesignation as corresponding authors in scientific publications. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0182513.

Grácio, M. C. C., Oliveira, E. F. T., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. & Moed, H. (2020, in press). Does correspondingauthorship influence scientific impact in collaboration: Brazilian institutions as a case of study. Scientometrics.

Hilário, C. M. & Grácio, M. C. C. (2017). Scientific collaboration in Brazilian researches: a comparative study in theinformation science, mathematics and dentistry fields. Scientometrics, 113(2), 929–950.

Hilário, C. M. (2020). A ordem dos autores como um indicador de produtividade relativa em coautorias: uma aplicaçãono Journal of informetrics (Tesis de doctorado). Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília.

Hsiehchen, D., Espinoza, M. & Hsieh, A. (2015). Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborativeresearch. Science advances, 1(8), e1500211.

Huang, M.-H., Lin, C.-S. & Chen, D. Z. (2011). Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation inthe assessment of national research productivity and Iict. Journal of the American Society for Information Scienceand Technology, 62(12), 2427-2436.

ICMJE (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Recuperado de http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

ICMJE (2020). Defining the role of authors and contributors. Recuperado de http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html

Journal of informetrics. (2018). Guide for authors. Recuperado de https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-informetrics/1751-1577/guide-for-authors

Katz, J. S. & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research policy, 26, 1-18.

Koehler, W. C., Anderson, A. D., Dowdy, B. A., Fields, D. E., Golden, M., Hall, D., . . ., & Wasteneys, C. D. (1999).A bibliometric exploration of the demographics of journal articles: fiy years of American Documentation and theJournal of the American Society for Information Science. Recuperado de http://www.ou.edu/cas/slis/courses/Methods/jbib

Liu, X. Z. & Fang, H. (2014). Scientific group leaders' authorship preferences: an empirical investigation. Scientometrics, 98(2), 909-925.

Man, J. P., Weinkauf, J. G., Tsang, M. & Sin, D. D. (2004). Why do some countries publish more than others?An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly rankedgeneral medical journals. European journal of epidemiology, 19(8), 811-817.

Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J. & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometricstudy of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99-105.

Mena-Chalco, J. P., Dalpian, G. M. & Capelle, K. (2014). Redes de colaboração acadêmica: um estudo de caso daprodução bibliográfica da UFABC. Revista interciente, 1, 50-58.

Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Bornmann, L. & Moed, H. F. (2013). The research guarantors of scientificpapers and the output counting: a promising new approach. Scientometrics, 97, 421-434.

Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Lopez-Illescas, C. & Moed, H. F. (2018). Statistical relationships betweencorresponding authorship, international co-authorship and citation impact of national research systems. Journalof informetrics, 12, 1251-1262.

Simiaki, S., Geraei, E. & Zare-Farashbandi, F. (2014). A study on scientific collaboration and co-authorship patternsin library and information science studies in Iran between 2005 and 2009. Journal of education and healthpromotion, 3(1), 99.

Tarkang, E. E., Kweku, M. & Zotor, F. B. (2017). Publication practices and responsible authorship: a review article.Journal of public health in Aica, 8(723), 36-42.

Weber, M. (2018). e effects of listing authors in alphabetical order: a review of the empirical evidence. Researchevaluation, 27(3), 238–245.

White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science andTechnology, 52(2), 87–108.

Wouters, P., elwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., Rijcke, S. d., Rushforth, A. & Franssen, T. (2015). e metric tide:literature review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessmentand Management). HEFCE. DOI: https://10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520

Yang, S., Wolfram, D. & Wang, F. (2017). e relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: acomparison of three general medical journals. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1273-1296.