SELECCIÓN LÓGICA Y HERMENÉUTICA PARA EL ENTENDIMIENTO EN METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA

Argota-Pérez, George/GAP, Gorina-Sánchez, Alexander/AGS and Iannacone, José/JI SELECCIÓN LÓGICA Y HERMENÉUTICA PARA EL ENTENDIMIENTO EN METODOLOGÍA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA. The Biologist (Lima), 2019, vol. 17, n. 2, pp. 307-314. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of AGS-63.pdf]
Preview
 Text
AGS-63.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (575kB) | Preview

English abstract

The correct wording on problematization is a necessary condition for publication in a scientific journal although what is published does not always denote a criterion or potential value in the methodology of scientific research. The aim of study was to describe the logical selection and hermeneutical for methodological understanding in scientific research. The gnoseological publication in ecotoxicology was selected by non-probabilistic sampling for convenience by using environmental tools (I: physicochemical parameters, II: bioassays, and III: biomarkers) in the 1995-2015 chronological series of four journals with high impact factor: 1) Science of The Total Environment (SE), 2) Chemosphere (Ch), 3) Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (EES); and 4) Environmental Pollution (EP). The order of the published articles was: SE (275) = EP: 275> Ch = 273> EES = 260 where there were statistically significant differences (p <0.0003). There were a low number of articles for periods related to environmental regulation integrating the three evaluations (16): 1995-2000 (1), 2001-2005 (0), 2006-2010 (4) and 2011-2015 (11) being subsequent the order of scientific journals: EES (6)> SE (5)> Ch (2) = EP (2). According to the observations, the need to propose a practical exercise for logic and hermeneutics of methodological understanding in scientific research was interpreted. The trend in the use of fish biomarkers was shown and, on the other hand, recognition of the practical exercise as a guide for scientific research.

Spanish abstract

La correcta redacción sobre la problematización resulta una condición necesaria para la publicación en una revista científica aunque lo que se publica, no siempre denota, un criterio o valor potencial en la metodología de la investigación científica. El objetivo del estudio fue describir la selección lógica y hermenéutica para el entendimiento metodológico en la investigación científica. Se seleccionó mediante un muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia la publicación gnoseológica en ecotoxicología mediante el uso de herramientas ambientales (I: parámetros fisico-químicos, II: bioensayos, y III: biomarcadores ícticos) en la serie cronológica de 1995-2015 de cuatro revistas con alto factor de impacto: 1) Science of The Total Environment (SE), 2) Chemosphere (Ch), 3) Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (EES); y 4) Environmental Pollution (EP). El orden de los artículos publicados fue: SE = 275 = EP = 275 > Ch = 273 > EES = 260 donde hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p< 0,0003). Existió un bajo número de artículos por periodos relacionados con la regulación ambiental integrando las tres evaluaciones (16): 1995-2000 (1), 2001-2005 (0), 2006-2010 (4) y 2011-2015 (11) siendo subsecuente el orden de las revistas científicas: EES (6) > SE (5) > Ch (2) = EP (2). Según las observaciones, se interpretó la necesidad de proponer un ejercicio práctico para lógica y hermenéutica del entendimiento metodológico en la investigación científica. Se mostró la tendencia en el uso de biomarcadores ícticos y por otra parte, el reconocimiento del ejercicio práctico como orientador para la investigación científica.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: aquatic ecotoxicology; environmental regulation; premise construction; scientific writing; ecotoxicología acuática; construcción de premisas; redacción científica; regulación ambiental
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GI. Training.
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
Depositing user: Dr.C. Alexander/AGS Gorina
Date deposited: 26 Jan 2021 03:17
Last modified: 26 Jan 2021 03:38
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/40939

References

Adams, R.; Martin, S. & Boom, K. 2018.

University culture and sustainability: Designing and implementing an enabling framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171: 434–445.

Argota, P.G. 2018. Problema científico. Biotempo,15: 217–229.

Argot a , P.G. 2019. Me todología de la investigación científica: ciencia, tecnología

y medioambiente. pp 19. Ed. KOPYgraf, Cusco-Perú.

Bajwa, S.J. & Sawhney, C. 2016. Preparing manuscript: scientific writing for publication. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60: 674–678.

Belderbos, R.; Gilsing, V.A. & Suzuki, S. 2016. Direct and mediated ties to universities: “scientific” absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization, 14: 32–52.

Crooks, N.M. & Alibali, M.W. 2014. Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review, 34: 344–377.

Disterheft, A.; Caeiro, S.; Leal, F.W. & Azeiteiro, U.M. 2016. The INDICARE-model – measuring and caring about participation in h i g h e r e d u c a t i o n ' s s u s t a i n a b i l i t y assessment. Ecological Indicators, 63: 172–186.

García, P.D.; Madrid, G.A. & Martin, D.P. 2017. Influence of university–firm governance on

SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123: 250–261.

Han, F. & Magee, C.L. 2018. Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology. Scientometrics, 116: 767–796.

Lillis, T. & Curry, M.J. 2015. The politics of English, language and uptake. The case of international academic journal article reviews. The politics of English, language and uptake, 28: 127–150.

Lin, L. & Evans, S. 2012. Structural patterns in e m p i r i c a l r e s e a r c h a r t i c l e s : A crossdisciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31: 150–160.

Luo, L. 2018. Experiencing evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP): Academic Librarians' perspective. College & Research Libraries, 79: 554–567.

McDonnell, J.J. 2017. Paper writing gone Hollywood. Science, 355: 102.

McKelvey, M. & Rake, B. 2016. Product innovation success based on cáncer research in the pharmaceutical industry: copublication networks and the effects of partners. Industry and Innovation, 23: 314, 57–71.

Turan, F.K.; Cetinkaya, S. & Ustun, C. 2016. A methodological framework to analyze stakeholder preferences and propose strategic pathways for a sustainable university. Higher Education, 72: 743–760.

Van Steendam, E. 2016. Editorial: forms of collaboration in writing. Journal Writing Research, 8: 183–204.

Wong, P.K. & Singh, A. 2013. Do co-publications with industry lead to higher levels of university technology commercialization activity?. Scientometrics, 97: 245–265.

Yallico, C.R.M.; Argota, P.G.; Pardo, A.P.E.; Lavanda, R.F.A.; Guevara, G.H.G. & Rodríguez, C.J.C. 2019. Confiabilidad interpretativa sobre la construcción científica de premisas en la redacción problemática de los manuscritos. Campus, 24: 205-212.

Zhou, P. & Tian, H. 2014. Funded collaboration research in mathematics in China. Scientometrics, 99: 695–715. 383–406.

Ni, P. & An, X. 2018. Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 116: 863–877.

Pierson, D.J. 2004. The top 10 reasons why m a n u s c r i p t s a r e n o t a c c e p t e d f o r publication. Respiratory Care, 49: 1246–1252.

Rittle, J.B.; Fyfe, E.R. & Loehr, A.M. 2016. Improving conceptual and procedural knowledge: The impact of instructional content within a mathematics lesson. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 576–591.

Shao, Z.Y.; Li, Y.M.; Hui, F.; Zheng, Y. & Guo, Y.J. 2018. Interdisciplinarity research based on NSFC-sponsored projects: A case study of mathematics in Chinese universities. PLoS

One, 13: 1–19.

Taşkın, Z. & Al, U. 2018. A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorization. Scientometrics, 114: 335–357.

Too, L. & Bajracharya, B. 2015. Sustainable campus: engaging the community in sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16: 57–71.

Turan, F.K.; Cetinkaya, S. & Ustun, C. 2016. A methodological framework to analyze stakeholder preferences and propose strategic pathways for a sustainable university. Higher Education, 72: 743–760.

Van Steendam, E. 2016. Editorial: forms of collaboration in writing. Journal Writing Research, 8: 183–204.

Wong, P.K. & Singh, A. 2013. Do co-publications with industry lead to higher levels of university technology commercialization activity?. Scientometrics, 97: 245–265.

Yallico, C.R.M.; Argota, P.G.; Pardo, A.P.E.; Lavanda, R.F.A.; Guevara, G.H.G. &

Rodríguez, C.J.C. 2019. Confiabilidad interpretativa sobre la construcción científica de premisas en la redacción problemática de los manuscritos. Campus, 24: 205-212.

Zhou, P. & Tian, H. 2014. Funded collaboration research in mathematics in China. Scientometrics, 99: 695–715.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS