Toward a global open access scholarly communications system – a developing region perspective

Notes for this chapter (see bibliographic references in the book bibliography https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4933/chapter/625184/Bibliography)

1. The author thanks Martin Paul Eve for his valuable comments and contributions

to improve this chapter.

2. Larivière, Haustein, and Mongeon, “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the

Digital Era,” https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.

3. Mikel Mancisidor, “El Derecho Humano a La Ciencia: Un Viejo Derecho Con Un

Gran Futuro,” Anuario de Derechos Humanos, no. 13 (2017): 211–221, https://doi.org

/10.5354/0718-2279.2017.46887.

4. Laura Czerniewicz, “This Map of the World’s Scientific Research Is Disturbingly

Unequal,” Quartz, July 11, 2015, https://qz.com/449405/this-map-of-the-worlds

-scientific-research-is-disturbingly-unequal/.

5. United Nations, “Sustainable Development Goals,” UNDP, accessed May 12, 2019,

https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html.

6. Martin Paul Eve and John Willinsky, “Open Access in Humanities and Social Sciences: Visions for the Future of Publishing,” College and Research Libraries News 76

(2015): 88–91.

7. Bibliothèque Scientifique Numérique, or Digital Scientific Library, “Jussieu Call

for Open Science and Bibliodiversity,” 2018, https://jussieucall.org/jussieu-call/.

8. Juan Pablo Alperin, “The Public Impact of Latin America’s Approach to Open

Access” (PhD diss., Stanford University, 2015), https://purl.stanford.edu/jr256tk1194.

9. United Nations, “Overview of OA in Latin America and the Caribbean,” United

Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, accessed May 12, 2019,

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and

-platforms/goap/access-by-region/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/.

10. Hebe Vessuri, Jean-Claude Guédon, and Ana María Cetto, “Excellence or Quality? Impact of the Current Competition Regime on Science and Scientific Publishing

in Latin America and Its Implications for Development,” Current Sociology 62, no. 5

(2014): 647–665, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839.

11. Again, see Abel Packer’s chapter in this volume.

12. Gabriel Vélez-Cuartas, Diana Lucio-Arias, and Loet Leydesdorff, “Regional and

Global Science: Publications from Latin America and the Caribbean in the SciELO

Citation Index and the Web of Science,” El Profesional de La Información 25, no. 1

(2016): 45, https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.ene.05.

13. Leslie Chan, “SciELO, Open Infrastructure and Independence,” SciELO in Perspective (blog), September 3, 2018, https://blog.scielo.org/en/2018/09/03/scielo-open

-infrastructure-and-independence/.

14. “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: Putting Science into the

Assessment of Research,” http://www.ascb.org/files/SFDeclarationFINAL.pdf.

15. Sandra Edith Miguel, “Revistas y Producción Científica de América Latina y el

Caribe: Su Visibilidad en SciELO, RedALyC y SCOPUS” 34, no. 2 (2011): 187–199.

http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.6384/pr.6384.pdf.

16. Vélez-Cuartas, Lucio-Arias, and Leydesdorff, “Regional and Global Science.”

17. “Browse by Country and Region,” Directory of Open Access Repositories, accessed

September 16, 2019, https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/view/repository_by_country/019.html.

18. “OpenAIRE Guidelines Documentation,” OpenAIRE, accessed September 23,

2019, https://guidelines.openaire.eu/en/latest/.

19. SIDALC, “About,” Alliance of Agricultural Information and Documentation Services of the Americas, accessed May 12, 2019, http://www.sidalc.net/en/aboutsidalc.

20. “Salvador Declaration on Open Access: The Developing World Perspective,” International Seminar on Open Access for Developing Countries, 2005, http://www.icml9

.org/meetings/openaccess/public/documents/declaration.htm; CLACSO, “Declaration

on Open Access to Knowledge Managed as a Commons by the Scholarly Community,”

2015, https://www.clacso.org.ar/conferencia2015/documentos/asamblea/declaraciones

/CLACSO-Declaration-on-open-access-to-knowledge-managed-as-a-commons-by

-the-scholarly-community.pdf; Latindex-Redalyc-CLACSO-Ibict, “Joint Declaration

by Latindex-Redalyc-CLACSO-Ibict on the Use Of CC BY-NC-SA License to Guarantee Protection of Academic and Scientific Open Access Output,” 2017, http://www

.accesoabiertoalyc.org/declaracion-mexico-en/.

21. First Consortium Assembly from Ibero-America and The Caribbean, “Declarations,” September 1, 2017, http://reuniondeconsorcios.conricyt.mx/index.php/primera

-reunion/declaraciones/?lang=en.

22. Czerniewicz, “This Map of the World’s Scientific Research Is Disturbingly Unequal.”

23. Anabel Marin, Sergio Petralia, and Lilia Stubrin, “Evaluating the Impact of Open

Access Initiatives within the Academia and Beyond,” in Made in Latin America: Open

Access, Scholarly Journals, and Regional Innovations, ed. Juan Pablo Alperin and Gustavo Fischman (Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015), 75–102, http:

//biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20150921045253/MadeInLatinAmerica.pdf.

24. Vessuri, Guédon, and Cetto, “Excellence or Quality?”

25. Federico Vasen, “The ‘Ivory Tower’ as Safe Bet: Science Policies and Research

Evaluation in Mexico,” Education Policy Analysis Archives 26, no. 96 (2018): 1–27,

https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3594.

26. Juan Pablo Alperin, Dominique Saugy de Babini, and Gustavo Fischman, Open

Access Indicators and Scholarly Communications in Latin America (Ciudad Autónoma

de Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014), http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20140917

054406/OpenAccess.pdf.

27. Keyla Mafalda de Oliveira Amorin et al., “Evaluation Systems of Scientific

Journals in Latin America,” in Made in Latin America: Open Access, Scholarly Journals,

and Regional Innovations, ed. Juan Pablo Alperin and Gustavo Fischman (Ciudad

Autónoma de Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2015), 61–74, http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar

/clacso/se/20150921045253/MadeInLatinAmerica.pdf.

28. Alperin, “The Public Impact of Latin America’s Approach to Open Access.”