Authority Control in the World of Metadata [English version presented at the International Conference] = L’authority control nel mondo dei metadati [Versione italiana presentata alla Conferenza internazionale]

Borbinha, José Authority Control in the World of Metadata [English version presented at the International Conference] = L’authority control nel mondo dei metadati [Versione italiana presentata alla Conferenza internazionale]., 2003 . In International Conference Authority Control: Definition and International Experiences, Florence, February 10-12 2003. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
borbinha_eng.pdf
Download (192kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
 PDF
borbinha_ita.pdf
Download (220kB) | Preview

English abstract

"Metadata" became a recent buzzword related with the explosion of the Internet and the emerging of new contents and services by some way associated to libraries, archives, museums, and related organisations. A name given to this new paradigm has been "Digital Libraries"! In spite of all the thinking and developments verified in the recent years, we have to accept that there is not a unique and global definition for the "Digital Library". The perception of it depends too much from the perspective taken (this might sound not very good to the traditional libraries, but we should remember that this fuzziness of concepts is not so strange to, for example, archives or museums). That is a fact that we assume, and is not the purpose of this paper to discuss it! But it is very important to recognise it, especially if our next steps are going to be the definition of common models, procedures and standards that everyone associates to the term "Authority Control".

Italian abstract

La parola "metadati" è recentemente diventata di moda, in relazione all’esplosione di Internet e all’emergere di nuovi contenuti e servizi in qualche modo associati alle biblioteche, agli archivi, ai musei e alle organizzazioni ad essi collegate. Un nome dato a questo nuovo contesto è stato “biblioteche digitali”! Nonostante tutte le riflessioni e gli sviluppi verificatisi negli anni recenti, dobbiamo accettare l’idea che non c’è una definizione unica e universale di "biblioteca digitale". La percezione dipende troppo dal punto di vista (questo potrebbe suonare non molto piacevole per le biblioteche tradizionali, ma dovremmo ricordare che questa confusione di concetti non è così strana, ad esempio, per archivi o musei). Questo è un fatto che diamo per scontato – e non è scopo di questa relazione discuterlo – ma è molto importante riconoscerlo, specialmente se andremo verso la definizione di modelli, procedure e standard comuni che ciascuno associa all’espressione "authority control".

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Authority control, digital libraries, metadata, MARC, XML, METS schema, MPEG, Moving Picture Expert Group, CIDOC, FRBR, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, OAI-PMH, Dublin Core, EAC, Encoded Archiving Context, LEAF, MoReq, ONIX, TEI Controllo d'autorità, biblioteche digitali, metadati, Requisiti funzionali per record bibliografici
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
I. Information treatment for information services
Depositing user: Maria Cristina Bassi
Date deposited: 18 Jul 2003
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 11:57
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/4147

References

[1] AACR. Joint Steering Committee for Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/jsc/

[2] ACM. ACM's Computing Classification System. http://www.acm.org/class/

[3] Borbinha, José. The Digital Library - Taking in Account Also the Traditional Library. Elpub2002 Proceedings, VWF Berlin, 2002, p.p. 70-80.

[4] Borbinha, José; Campos, Fernanda; Cardoso, Fernando. Deposit Collections of Digital Publications: A Pragmatic Strategy for an Analysis. Chapter 4 of “World Libraries on the Information Superhighway: Preparing for the Challenges of the Next Millennium”, Idea Group Press, USA, December 1999.

[5] Bormans, Jan; Hill, Keith. MPEG-21 Overview. ISO/IEC working group JTC1/SC29/WG11/N4318. Version 0.2, July 2001.

[6] CEDARS. Curl exemplars in digital archives. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cedars/

[7] CIDOC. CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/

[8] Cover Pages. Encoded Archival Context Initiative (EAC). http://xml.coverpages.org/eac.html

[9] Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/

[10] Day, Neil; Martínez, José M. Introduction to MPEG-7. ISO/IEC working group JTC1/SC29/WG11/N4325. Version 3.0, July 2001.

[11] DCMI. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://www.dublincore.org

[12] DELOS. Digital Libraries: Future Directions for a European Research Programme. Brainstorming Report. San Cassiano, Alta Badia - Italy. June 13-15, 2001.htpp://www.iei.pi.it/DELOS/delo2/International/brainstorming.htm.

[13] DELOS. Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries. http://www.ercim.org/delos/

[14] DELOS. Reference Models for Digital Libraries: Actors and Roles. http://www.delos-nsf.actorswg.cdlib.org/

[15] DiTeD. Digital Thesis and Dissertations. <http://dited.bn.pt>

[16] D-Lib Forum. http://www.dlib.org.

[17] EDItEUR. http://www.editeur.org.

[18] Encoded Archival Context (EAC). http://www.library.yale.edu/eac/

[19] IDA. Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records (MoReq) http://www.cornwell.co.uk/moreq

[20] IFLA. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm

[21] IFLA. IFLA Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Core Activity (UBCIM). http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/ubcim.htm

[22] ISO. ISO 2709: Documentation format for bibliographic information interchange for magnetic tape. ISO 1981.

[23] LEAF. Linking and Exploring Authority Files. http://www.leaf-eu.org/

[24] LOC. Encoded Archival Description (EAD). http://www.loc.gov/ead/.

[25] LOC. MARC Code Lists for Relators, Sources, Description and Conventions. http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/

[26] LOC. MARC Standards. http://www.loc.gov/marc/

[27] LOC. METS - Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/.

[28] LOC. Z39.50 Maintenance Agency. http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/

[29] LOC. ZING, Z39.50-International: Next Generation. http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/.

[30] MALVINE. Manuscripts and Letters via Integrated Networks in Europe. http://www.cordis.lu/libraries/en/projects/malvine.html

[31] MPEG. Moving Picture Expert Group. http://www.cselt.it/mpeg.

[32] NEDLIB. <http://www.konbib.nl/nedlib>

[33] OAF. Open Archives Forum. http://www.oaforum.org/

[34] OAI. Open Archives Initiative. http://www.openarchives.org/

[35] OMG. Catalog of OMG Specifications. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/spec_catalog.htm

[36] PANDORA. Preserving and Accessing Networked Documentary Resources of Australia. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/

[37] PORBASE. Protótipo de acesso por URN à PORBASE. http://urn.porbase.org

[38] TEL. The European Library. http://www.europeanlibrary.org/

[39] Topic Maps. Topic Maps Consortium. http://www.topicmaps.org/

[40] W3C. Extensible Markup Language (XML). http://www.w3c.org/XML/

[41] W3C. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/

[42] W3C. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-smil/

[43] W3C. Web Services Activities. http://www.w3c.org/2002/ws/

[44] W3C. XML Schema. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS