Metadata initiatives and emerging technologies to improve resource discovery

1. Ding W and Marchionini G, A comparative study of web search service performance, In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, (Baltimore: October 21-24) (1996), p.136-142.

2. Persico J Jr., Leadership and empowerment in a total quality organization, Total Quality Management, 2 (1) (1991) 57-67.

3. Milstead J and Feldman S, Metadata: Cataloging by any other name, Online (© Information Today Inc.), January issue (1999), Available at: http://www.infotoday.com/online/OL1999/milstead1.html (Accessed on Accessed on 12 May 2008)

4. DCMI, Introduction: What is Metadata, Available at: http://dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/ (Accessed on 12 May 2008)

5. NISO, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set Approved, Available at: http://www.niso.org/news/releases/PRDubCr.html (Accessed on 18 May 2008)

6. Cathro W, Metadata: an overview, (1997), Available at: http://www.nla.gov.au/nla/staffpaper/cathro3.html (Accessed on 22 June 2008)

7. NISO, Understanding Metadata, Online edn (NISO Press; Bethesda, MD), 2004, p.1-12

8. Strebel D, Meeson B and Frithesen J, Metadata standards and concepts for interdisciplinary scientific system – II, Position paper from IEEE Metadata Workshop (Washington D C: May 1994).

9. Bor-Ng K, Park S and Burnett K, Control or management: a comparison of the two approaches for establishing metadata schemes in the digital environment, Available at: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~sypark/asis.html (Accessed on 16 July 2008)

10. Lagoze C, The Warwick framework: a container architecture for diverse sets of metadata, D-Lib Magazine, July-August issue (1996), Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july96/lagoze/07lagoze.html (Accessed on 18 July 2008)

11. Dempsey L and Heery R, Specification for resource description methods (Part 1) - A review of metadata: a survey of current resource description formats - some characteristics of investigated metadata formats), In Work Package 3 of Telematics for Research project DESIRE (RE-1004), UKOLN Metadata Group, Available at: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_01.htm (Accessed on 10 August 2008)

12. Milstead J and Feldman S, Metadata projects and standards, Online (©Information Today Inc.), January issue (1999), Available at: http://www.infotoday.com/online/OL1999/milstead1.html (Accessed on 14 August 2008)

13. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Available at: http://www.w3.org/Metadata/ (Accessed on 14th August 2008)

14. Hunter J L, A survey of metadata research for organizing the web, Library Trends, 52 (2) (2003) 318-344.

15. Smits J, The creation and integration of metadata in spatial data collections, In Digital Map Librarianship: a working syllabus, 63rd IFLA Conference, (Copenhagen, Denmark: August 18) (1997)

16. Day M, Metadata: mapping between metadata formats, UKOLN - The UK Office for Library and Information Networking (University of Bath, UK: May 2002), Available at: http://ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability/ (Accessed on 27 August 2008)

17. Polydoratou P and Nicholas D, Familiarity with and use of metadata formats and metadata registries amongst those working in diverse professional communities within the information sector, ASLIB Proceedings, 53 (8) (2001) 309-324.

18. Op. Cit. Dempsey L and Heery R

19. Quam E, Informing and evaluating a metadata initiative: usability and metadata studies in Minnesota’s Foundations Project, Government Information Quarterly, 18 (2001) 181-194.

20. DCMI – Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Available at: http://dublincore.org/ (Accessed on 19 September 2008)

21. DCMI – Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (version 1.1): reference description, Available at: http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (Accessed on 19 September 2008)

22. Burnett K, Bor-Ng K and Park S, A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (13) (1999) 1209-1217 [Special issue: Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards]

23. Dekkers M and Weibel S L, Dublin Core metadata initiative progress report and workplan for 2002, D-Lib Magazine, 8 (2) (2002) 1-9, Available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/february02/weibel/02weibel.html (Accessed on 28 September 2008)

24. Guinchard C, Dublin Core use in libraries: a survey, OCLC Systems and Services, 18 (1) (2002) 40-50.

25. Johnson B C, XML and MARC: which is right, Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 32 (2) (2001) 107-126.

26. Library of Congress, MARC standards, Available at: http://www.loc.gov/marc/ (Accessed on 6 October 2008)

27. Library of Congress - MARBI Committee, The MARC 21 formats: background and principles (revised version - November 1996), Available at: http://www.loc.gov/marc/96principl.html (Accessed on 6 October 2008)

28. Kellogg D, Open source OAI metadata harvesting tools (meeting report of Digital Library Federation - October 2004), Available at: http://www.diglib.org/aquifer/oct2504/harvesting.pdf (Accessed on 18 October 2008).

29. Powell A, DC-dot: Dublin Core metadata editor (developed by UKOLN metadata project, University of Bath, UK), Available at: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcdot/ (Accessed on 2 November 2008).

30. Prasad A R D, Using multiple metadata formats in DSpace, paper presented on 6-8 July 2005 at a User Meet at the Cambridge University, UK.

31. DSpace Federation at MIT, DSpace system documentation: metadata, Available at: http://www.dspace.org/technology/system-docs/functional.html (Accessed on 21 November 2008)

32. Mohamed K, Merging multiple search results for Meta search engines, Dissertation submitted at the School of Information Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 2004.

33. Turner T P and Brackbill L, Rising to the top: evaluating the use of the HTML meta tag to improve retrieval of world wide web documents through Internet search engines, Library Resources and Technical Services, 42 (4) (1998) 258-71.

34. Dawson A and Hamilton V, Optimizing metadata to make highvalue content more accessible to Google users, Journal of Documentation, 62 (3) (2006) 307-327.

35. Mohamed K A F, The impact of metadata in web resource discovering, Online Information Review 30 (2) (2006) 155-167.

36. Chan L M, Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging, Information Technology and Libraries, 8 (4) (1989) 349-358.

37. Weinheimer J L, How to keep the practice of librarianship relevant in the age of the Internet, Vine, 29 (3) (1999) 14-37.

38. Thomas C F and Griffin L S, Who will create the Metadata for the Internet?, First Monday, 3 (12) (1998), Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/

633 (Accessed on 18 December 2008)

39. Greenberg J, Pattuelli M C, Parsia B, and Robertson W D, Author-generated Dublin Core metadata for web resources: a baseline study in an organization, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, (National Institute of Informetrics [NII], Tokyo,

Japan: October 24-26) (2001) p.38-46.

40. Richmond A, META tagging for search engines, Web Developer’s Virtual Library, Available at: http://www.wdvl.com/Search/Meta/Tag.html (Accessed on 22 December 2008)

41. OCLC – Online Computer Library Center, InterCAT Project, Available at: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/archive/intercat.htm (Accessed on 28th December 2008)