Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity

Pal, Jiban K. and Sarkar, Soumitra Evaluation of Institutional Research Productivity. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (ISSN:0974-0643), 2020, vol. 40, n. 01, pp. 406-417. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
Text
Evaluation of institutional research productivity.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (668kB) | Preview

English abstract

The quantification of scholarly performance has become an obvious necessity in many academic pursuits. Evaluation of research output is, therefore, an integral element of R&D institutions worldwide. This paper critically scrutinizes the literature on research productivity concerning scientific institutions (include universities and departments) in an informational context. It provides a thorough review to map the quantum of knowledge relating to ‘institutional research productivity’ correlating the Indian vista. The paper also offers a few recommendations to undertake evaluative studies with caution. Thus it shows a coherent picture of this emerging area in the sociology of science.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientometrics; Scientific visualisation; Knowledge mapping; Research evaluation; Institutional productivity; Publishing performance; Single-institutional studies
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
Depositing user: Dr. Jiban K. Pal
Date deposited: 17 Feb 2021 01:32
Last modified: 17 Feb 2021 01:32
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/41737

References

Abilash, S. Evaluation of research performance using scientometric technique from selected higher education institutions in Kerala. Manonmaniam Sundaranar university, Tirunelveli. 2012. Ph.D Thesis.

Abramo, Giovanni; D’Angelo, C.A. & Pugini, F. The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric - bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 2008, 76(2), 225-244. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1942-2.

Albert, Armando; Granadino, Begona & Plaza, Luis M. Scientific and technological performance evaluation of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) in the field of Biotechnology. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(1), 41-51. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0103-y.

Alibeygi, Amirhossein. An analysis of the research productivity of faculty members: The case of Razi university. Q. J. Res. Plann. Higher Educ., 2008, 46, 125-154.

Allison, Paul D. & Stewhart, John A. Productivity differences among scientists: evidence for accumulative advantage. Am. Sociol. Rev., 1974, 39(4), 596-606. DOI: 10.2307/2094424.

Andrews, Frank M. (ed.). Scientific Productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979. 469p.

Angadi, Mallikarjun; Koganuramath, M.M.; Kademani, B.S. & Kumbar, B.D. Publication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences: A scientometric study. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2006, 43(4), 363-374. DOI: 10.17821/srels/2006/v43i4/44401.

Anilkumar, Nishtha. Identification of research trends at Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad, India. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2014, 1152, 1-20.

Anilkumar, Nishtha. Research undertaken in Physical Research Laboratory (PRL): A bibliometric study. Maharaja Sayajirao university of Baroda. 2011. Ph.D Thesis.

Anyaogu, Uluocha & Iyabo, Mabawonku. Demographic variables as correlates of lecturers research productivity in Faculties of Law in Nigerian universities, DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2014, 34(6), 505-510. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.34.6.7962.

Baby, K. & Kumaravel, J.P.S. Research productivity of Periyar university: A bibliometric analysis. Int. Res. J. Libr., Inf. Archival Stud., 2012, 1(1), 1-8.

Bala, Adarsh & Gupta, B.M. Growth and impact of research output of Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh: A case study. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2009, 56(2), 86-94.

Bala, Adarsh & Kumari, Santosh. Research performance of National Institutes of Technology (NITS) of India during 2001-2010: A bibliometric analysis. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2013, 50(5), 555-572. DOI: 10.17821/srels/2013/v50i5/43774.

Baskaran, C. Research productivity of Alagappa university during 1999-2011: A bibliometric study. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2013, 33(3), 236-242.DOI: 10.14429/djlit.33.3.4609.

Batcha, Sadik M. Research output analysis of top six universities of Tamil Nadu, India: A scientometric view. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018, 1854, 1-12.

Beck, M. & Gaspar, V. Scientometric evaluation of the scientific performance at the faculty of natural sciences, Kossuth Lajos university, Debrecen, Hungary. Scientometrics, 1991, 20(1), 37-54. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018142.

Bhakta, Jayanta & Bhui, Trishna. Mapping the research productivity in university of petroleum and energy studies: A scientometric approach. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018, 1972, 1-10.

Bindon, G. Output measures of cooperative research: The case of the Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(2), 85-106. DOI: 10.1007/BF02025632.

Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Daraio, Cinzia. A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Res. Eval., 2003, 12(1), 47-69. DOI: 10.3152/147154403781776726.

Bradley, Susan J.; Willett, Peter & Wood, Frances E. A publication and citation analysis of the department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, 1980-1990. J. Inf. Sci., 1992, 18(3), 225-232. DOI: 10.1177/016555159201800307.

Budd, John. M. Faculty Publishing Productivity: An institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College Res. Libr., 1995, 56(6), 547-554. DOI: 10.5860/crl_56_06_547.

Chaurasia, Neeraj Kumar, & Chavan Shankar B. Research output of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi) during 2001-2010: A bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Inf. Dissemination Technol., 2014, 4(2), 141-147.

Coccia, Mario. A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3), 307-321. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1.

Coccia, Mario. New models for measuring the R&D performance and identifying the productivity of public research institutes. R&D Manage., 2004, 34(3), 267-280. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00338.x.

Cole, Jonathan R. & Cole, Stephen. Social stratification in science. Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1973.

Dhawan, S.M. & Gupta, B.M. Physics research in India: A study of institutional performance based on publications output. DESIDOC Bulletin Inf. Technol., 2007, 27(1), 55-67. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.28.7.123.

Duraipandi, R. Mapping the research output of Jawaharlal Nehru university: A scientometric study. Bharathidasan university. 2015. Ph.D Thesis.

Endler, N.S. Research productivity and scholarly impact of Canadian psychology departments. Can. Psychol. Rev., 1977, 18(2), 152.

Fincher, Cameron. The assessment of institutional productivity. Res. Higher Educ., 1983, 19(3), 381-384. DOI: 10.1007/BF00976514.

Frohlich, Cliff & Resler, Lynn. Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2001, 52(9), 701-713.DOI: 10.1002/asi.1121.

Garcia, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, R.; Fdez-Valdiva, J.; Torres-Salinas, D. & Herrera, F. Ranking of research output of universities on the basis of the multidimensional prestige of influential fields: Spanish universities as a case of study. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(3), 1081-1099. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0740-7.

Garfield, Eugene & Welljams-Dorof, Alfred. Citation data: Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Sci. Public Policy, 1992, 19(5), 321-327.DOI: 10.1093/spp/19.5.321.

Garg, Kailesh Chandra & Rao, M.K.D. Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: A case study of an Indian physics laboratory. Scientometrics, 1988, 13(5-6), 261-269. DOI: 10.1007/BF02019962.

Gautam, Vinod Kumar & Mishra, Rajani. Scholarly research trend of Banaras Hindu university during 2004-2013: a scientometric study based on Indian Citation Index. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2015, 35(2), 75-81.DOI: 10.14429/djlit.35.2.8021.

Geisler, Eliezer. Key output indicators in performance evaluation of research and development organisations. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 1994, 47(2), 189-203. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(94)90028-0.

Ghosh, Narayan Chandra. Information approach to institution building through research publications: Case of Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (1940-2010). university of Calcutta. 2014. Ph.D Thesis.

Glenn, N.D. & Villemez, W. The productivity of sociologists at 45 American universities. Am. Sociologist, 1970, 5(3), 244-252.

Gopikuttan, A. &Aswathy, S. Publication productivity of university of Kerala: A scientometric view. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2014, 34(2), 131-139.

Gupta, B.M.; Kumbar, B.D. & Sangam, Shivappa L. Contribution and impact of Karnataka university publications during 1999-2008: A comparative study with three other universities of Karnataka. Int. Res.: J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2013, 3(2), 1-18.

Guskov, Andrey E.; Kosyakov, Denis V. & Selivanova, Irina V. Boosting research productivity in top Russian universities: The circumstances of breakthrough. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2), 1053-1080. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8.

Haiqi, Zhang. Research performance in key medical universities in China observed from the scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 1996, 37(1), 177-190. DOI: 10.1007/BF02093494.

Huang, Mu-Hsuan; Wu, L.L. & Wu, y.C. A study of research collaboration in the pre-web and post-web stages: A coauthorship analysis of the information systems discipline. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015, 66(4), 778-797. DOI:10.1002/asi.23196.

Husian, Shabahat & Muzamil, Mushtaq. Scientometric study of Indian central universities: A picture from Scopus. J. Indian Libr. Assoc., 2011, 47(3-4), 5-12.

Irvine, John & Martin, Ben. Evaluating big science: CERN’s past performance and future prospects. Scientometrics, 1985, 7(3-6), 281-308. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017150.

Irvine, John. Evaluation of scientific institutions: Lessons from a bibliometric study of uK technical universities. In David Evered and Sara Harnett (Eds.), The evaluation of scientific research. John Wiley, New York, 1989. 276p.

Jeevan, V.K.J. & Gupta, B.M. A scientometric profile of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Scientometrics, 2002, 53(1), 165-168.DOI: 10.1023/A:1014896206968.

Jeevan, V.K.J. & Gupta, B.M. R&D performance of different departments of IIT, Kharagpur: A scientometric study based on publications. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2001, 26(2), 129-143.

Jeyshankar, R.; Babu, B.; Ramesh & Rajendran, P. Research output of CSIR-Central Electro Chemical Research Institute (CECRI): A study. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2011, 58(4), 301-306.

Jeyshankar, Ramalingam. Research productivity of the scientists of Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research (IGCAR) Kalpakkam (Chennai): A scientometric analysis. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2015, 1294, 1-18.

Jokić, Maja Marija; Stepanić, Josip; Kamenar, Boris & Silobrčić, Vlatko. Research output of Croatian universities from 1996 to 2004, registered by the SCI-expanded. Interdisciplinary description of complex systems: INDECS, 2006, 4(1), 44-50.

Kademani, B.S.; Kumar, Vijai; Surwase, Ganesh; Sagar, Anil; Mohan, Lalit; Gaderao, C. R.; Kumar, Anil; Kalyane, V.L. & Prakasan, E.R. Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity of the Chemistry Division at Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Malaysian J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2005, 10(1), 65-89.

Kaur, Har & Mahajan, Preeti. Comparative evaluation of research output: AIIMS Vs PGIMER. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2012, 32(6), 533-538. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.32.6.2852.

Kaur, Har & Mahajan, Preeti. Ranking of medical institutes of India for quality and quantity: A case study. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(2), 1129-1139.

Kaur, Har; Mahajan, Preeti & Gupta, B.M. Scientometric analysis of the research output: A study of Government Medical College & Hospital (GMCH), Chandigarh. COLLNET J. Scientometrics Inf. Manage., 2011, 5(2), 217-226. DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2011.10700914.

Ketzler, Rolf & Zimmermann, Klaus F. A citation-analysis of economic research institutes. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(3), 1095-1112. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0850-2.

Khan, Nadim Akhtar & Ahangar, Humma. Research productivity of Government Medical College Jammu: A bibliometric analysis. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2015, 1262, 1-17.

Khanna, Sunaina; Singh, Neeraj Kumar; Tewari, Deepika & Saini, Harinder Singh. Scientometric analysis of the research output of Physics and Astronomy of Guru Nanak Dev university during 2006-15. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2017, 37(5), 337-345. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.37.5.10683.

Kim, Mee-Jean. A bibliometric analysis of publications by the School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National university, South Korea. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2), 999-1019. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1084-7.95.

Haq, Ikram ul & Fouzan, Khalid Al. Research productivity at King Saud bin Abdul Aziz university for Health Sciences, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A bibliometric appraisal. J. Rawalpindi Med. College, 2017, 21(2), 182-186.

Kim, yangson; Lim, Hee Jin & Lee, Soo Jeung. Applying research collaboration as a new way of measuring research performance in Korean universities. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(1), 97-115. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1095-4.

King, Jean. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J. Inf. Sci., 1987, 13(5), 261-276. DOI: 10.1177/016555158701300501.

Koenig, Michael E.D. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1983, 34(2), 136–145. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630340207.

Kumar, H. Anil & Dora, Mallikarjun. Research productivity in a management institute: An analysis of research performance of Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad during 1999-2010. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2012, 32(4), 365-372.

Kumar, Narendra. Determination of performance measures of scientists in Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (India): A bibliometric study of research papers. Delhi university. 1999. Ph.D Thesis.

Kumar, Satish. Bibliometric mapping of research productivity of TIFR, Mumbai as seen through the mirror of Web of Science. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018b, 1819, 1-20.

Kumar, Satish. Scientometric study of research productivity of ARIES, Nainital. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018a, 1680, 1-14.

Kumar, Shailendra & Naqvi, Shehbaz Husain. Research output in the field of natural sciences: A bibliometric case study of Jamia Millia Islamia university, New Delhi. IFLA Journal, 2010, 36(4), 317-324.

Kumar, Surendra. Productometric study of oil seed crops research institutes of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Vikram University, Ujjain. 2010. Ph.D Thesis.

Kumbar, B.D. & Gupta, B.M. Contribution of Karnataka university in science & technology: Research output and citation impact during 2001-10. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2013, 33(2), 114-124.

Kumbar, Mallinath; Gupta, B.M. & Dhawan, S.M. Growth and impact of research output of university of Mysore 1996-2006: A case study. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2008, 55(5), 185-195.

Lawani, Stephen M. Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity. BioScience, 1977, 27(1), 26-31. DOI: 10.2307/1297790.

Lee, Chu Keong. A scientometric study of the research performance of the institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics, 2003, 56(1), 95-110. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021902724734.

Lee, Duk Hee; Seo, I. Won; Choe, Ho Chull & Kim, Hee Dae. Collaboration network patterns and research performance: The case of Korean public research institutions. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(3), 925-942. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0602-8.

Leema Helen, T. Research productivity in Madurai Kamaraj university: A scientometric approach. Madurai Kamraj university. 2014. Ph.D Thesis.

Le-Minor, S. & Dostatni, Paulette. A bibliometric study of the publication of the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM). Scientometrics, 1991, 22(1), 41-63. DOI: 10.1007/BF02019274.

Li, Jing; Wu, Dengsheng; Li, Jianping & Li, Minglu. A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: Evidence from the information management literature of china. Inf. Process. Manage., 2017, 53(5), 1156-1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2017.05.002.

Lindsey, Duncan. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship. Soc. Stud. Sci., 1980, 10(2), 145-162. DOI: 10.1177/030631278001000202.

Maharana, Rabindra K. & Sethi, Bipin Bihari. A bibliometric analysis of the research output of Sambalpur university’s publication in ISI web of science during 2007-11. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2013, 926, 1-13.

Maharana, Rabindra K. Bibliometric analysis of Orissa university of Agricultural Technology’s research output as indexed in Scopus in 2008-2012. Chin. Libra.: Int. Electron. J., 2013, 36, 25-34.

Mandhirasalam, M. Research output of PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore: A scientometric study. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2016, 53(3), 229-235. DOI: 10.17821/srels/2016/v53i3/70496.

McCallum, K. Research/publication productivity of uS speech communication departments. South. J. Commun., 1984, 49(2), 135-142. DOI: 10.1080/10417948409372595.

Mehta, Neeta. Measuring organisational scientific productivity: A study at NCL. Current Science, 2005, 88(2), 223-230.

Mishra, Paras Nath. Productometric analysis of research contributions made in the field of metallurgy and material science: A case of NML (CSIR). Sambalpur University. 2010. Ph.D Thesis.

Mondal, Dhiman & Raychoudhury, Nitai. Research productivity of Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP), India with special reference to international collaborative experimental consortia. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018, 1863, 1-15.

Mukherjee, Bhaskar. Research in Indian CSIR laboratories: A bibliometric study. SRELS J. Inf. Manage., 2017, 54(4), 165-174. DOI: 10.17821/srels/2017/v54i4/118103.

Mulimani, Renuka S. & Hadagali, Gururaj S. Research productivity of Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (IITR): A scientometric analysis. Libr. Philos. Pract.,2018, 2026, 1-17.

Munshi, usha Mujoo. Assessment of agricultural research output: A bibliometric analysis of research output of Indian Agricultural universities. Jiwaji university, Gwalior. 1994. Ph.D Thesis.

Nagpaul, P.S. Contribution of Indian universities to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 1995, 32(1), 11-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF02020186.

Naika, Manju. Performance of Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Mumbai, India. 2017. Ph.D Thesis.

Nandi, Amitava. Contributions of the university of Burdwan in pure sciences research in West Bengal: An analytical study. Burdwan university. 2010. Ph.D Thesis.

National Research Council. US Research Institutes in the Mathematical Sciences: Assessment and perspectives. (Report of the Committee on US Mathematical Sciences Research Institutes, Board on Mathematical Sciences). National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1999. 42p.

NIRF-MHRD, Government of India (2015). National Institutional Ranking Framework: Parameters. Retrieved from: https://www.nirfindia.org/Parameter (accessed on 4 March 2018).

Nishavathi, E. & Jeyshankar, Ramalingam. Research productivity of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS): A scientometric analysis. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2018, 1804, 1-20.

Nongrang, Khrawbok, & Laloo, Bikika. Bibliometric study of biochemistry literature in North Eastern Hill university during 2000 to 2010. COLLNET J. Scientometrics Inf. Manage., 2016, 10(2), 197-207. DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2016.1213964.

Nongrang, Khrawbok. Research output of faculty members of North Eastern Hill university: A bibliometric study of periodical literature 2000-2010. North-Eastern Hill University. 2017. Ph.D Thesis.

Noyons, E.C.M.; Moed, H.F. & Luwel, M. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sc., 1999, 50(2), 115-131. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<115::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-J.

Pal, Jiban K. Scientometric dimensions of cryptographic research. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(1), 179-202. DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1661-z

Pandita, Ramesh; Singh, Shivendra & Gaur, Ramesh Chandra. Research output of some selected Indian medical research institutions (2007-2011). Libr. Philos. Pract., 2014, 1065, 1-20.

Pastor, José Manuel; Serrano, Lorenzo & Zaera, Irene. The research output of European higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(3), 1867-1893. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1509-y.

Pathak, Manohar & Bharati, Avinah Kumar. Botanical Survey of India (1971–2010): A scientometric analysis. Current Science, 2014, 106(7), 964-971.

Pradhan, Banalata & Ramesh, Dola Babu. Scientometric analysis of research publications of six Indian Institutes of Technology. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2018, 65(1), 50-56.

Prathap, Gangan & Gupta, B.M. Ranking of Indian medical colleges for their research performance during 1999-2008. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2011, 58(3), 203-210.

Prathap, Gangan & Gupta, B.M. Ranking of Indian universities for their research output and quality using a new performance index. Current Science, 2009, 97(6), 751-752.

Price, Derek John deSolla. Little science, big science ...and beyond. Columbia university Press, New york, 1963. 301p.

Pudovkin, A.; Kretschmer, Hildrun; Stegmann, Johannes & Garfield, Eugene. Research evaluation. Part I: productivity and citedness of a German medical research institution. Scientometrics, 2012, 93(1), 3-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0659-z.

Rao, Inna Kedage Ravichandra. The distribution of scientific productivity and social change. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1980, 31(2), 111–122. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630310208.

Rautaray, Bijayalaxmi; Swain, Dillip K. & Swain, Chandrakanta. Scientometric dimension of research productivity of a leading private university in India. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2013, 933, 1-18.

Rijcke, S.D.; Wouters, P.F.; Rushforth, A.D.; Franssen, T.P. & Hammarfelt, B. Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use: A literature review. Res. Eval., 2016, 25(2), 161-169.DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv038.

Rosaline, Mary A. Mapping the research productivity of universities in Tamilnadu. Bharathidasan university, Tiruchirappalli. 2016. Ph.D Thesis.

Royle, Pam & Over, Ray. The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the research productivity of Australian academics. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr., 1994, 25(2), 77-88. DOI: 10.1080/00048623.1994.10754876.

Rushton J. Philippe. A ten-year scientometric revisit of British Psychology departments. The Psychologist, 1989, 2, 64-68.

Rushton, J.P. & Meltzer, S. Research Productivity, university revenue, and scholarly impact of 31 Canadian universities. Can. J. Higher Educ., 1979, 9(3), 74-81.

Russell, Jane M. & Rousseau, Ronald. Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation (pp.42-64). In Rigas Arvanitis (ed.), Science and Technology Policy (Volume 2). EOLSS/ uNESCO Publishers, Oxford, 2002. 315p.

Sangeeta. Research productivity in sciences in the universities of Punjab. Guru Nanak Dev university, Amritsar. 2016. Ph.D Thesis.

Sarkhel, Juran Krishna & Raychoudhury, Nitai. Contributions of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya to agricultural research: A bibliometric study. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2010, 57(4), 2010, 348-355.

Satpathy, Sunil Kumar & Sa, Manoj Kumar. Research outputs of state government universities of Odisha: A bibliometric study. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2015, 1309, 1-13.

Savanur, Kiran & Konnur, P.V. Growth and impact of research output of Bangalore University, 1971-2010: A scientometric study. Int. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2012, 4(5), 71-80.

Schloegl, Christian; Gorraiz, Juan; Bart, Christoph & Bargmann, Monika. Evaluating two Austrian university departments: Lessons learned. Scientometrics, 2003, 56(3), 289-299.DOI: 10.1023/A:1022318618200.

Schubert, A. & Braun, T. Some scientometric measures of publishing performance for 85 Hungarian research institutes. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(5), 379-388. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017575.

Seetharam, Geetha. Science indicators: To study and analysis the scientific literature in food science and technology with an emphasis on Central Food Technological Research Institute’s (CFTRI) research publications. Mysore University. 1997. Ph.D Thesis.

Sen, Bimal Kanti. Normalised impact factor. Journal of Documentation, 1992, 48(3), 318-325.DOI: 10.1108/eb026901.

Sen, Subir K. & Gan, Shymal Kumar. Bibliometrics: Concept and application in the study of productivity of scientists. Int. Forum Inf. Doc., 1990, 15(3), 13-21.

Sevukan, R. & Sharma, Jaideep. Bibliometric analysis of research output of biotechnology faculties in some Indian Central universities. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2008, 28(6), 11-20.DOI: 10.14429/djlit.28.6.218.

Shockley, William. On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. In Proceedings of the IRE, 1957, 45(3), 279-290. DOI: 10.1109/JRPROC.1957.278364.

Simeon, V.; Momcilovic, B.; Kralj, Z. & Grgas, B. Multivariate statistical analysis of the bibliographic output from a research institution, in relation to the measures of scientific policy. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5-6), 223-230. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017245.

Singh, yogendra; Gupta, B.M. & Kumar, Suresh. Research contributions and impact of research of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee: 1993-2001. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2005, 52(1), 8-14.

Siwach, Anil Kumar & Kumar, Satish. Bibliometric analysis of research publications of Maharshi Dayanand University (Rohtak) during 2000-2013. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2015, 35(1), 17-24. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.35.1.7789.

Smyth, Russell & Mishra, Vinod. Academic inbreeding and research productivity and impact in Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(1), 583-618. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1052-2.

Solanki, T.; Uddin, A. & Singh, V.K. Research competitiveness of Indian institutes of science education and research. Current Science, 2016, 110(3), 307-310.

Stvilia, Besiki.; Hinnant, Charles C.; Schindler, Katy; Worrall, Adam; Burnett, Gary; Burnett, Kathleen; Kazmer, Michelle M. & Marty, Paul F. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011, 62(2), 270-283.DOI: 10.1002/asi.21464.

Sudhier, K.G. Pillai & Priyalakshmi, V. Research publication trend among the scientists of Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (CTCRI), Thiruvananthapuram: a scientometric study. Annals Libr. Inf. Stud., 2013, 60(1), 7-14.

Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web. El profesional de la información, 2015, 24(5).DOI: 10.3145/epi.2015.sep.08

Tripathi, Manorama & Kumar, Sunil. A quantitative analysis of research output of Jawaharlal Nehru university, New Delhi, India. Int. Inf. Libr. Rev., 2015, 47(1-2), 39-51. DOI: 10.1080/10572317.2015.1051908.

Valles-Valenzuela, Javier; Pérez-Cárceles, María D.; Osuna, Eduardo & Luna, Aurelio. Quantitative analysis of Spanish University scientific output in the area of legal and forensic medicine: international exposure. Scientometrics, 2009, 78(3), 383-395. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1808-2.

van-Raan, Anthony F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 1999, 45(3), 417-423. DOI: 10.1007/BF02457601.

van-Raan, Anthony F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods to assess research performance and scientific development: Basic principles and recent practical applications. Res. Eval., 1993, 3(3), 151-166.DOI: 10.1093/rev/3.3.151.

Vasishta, Seema. Assessment of academic research output during 1996-2009: A case study of PEC university of Technology, Chandigarh. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2011, 31(2), 136-142.DOI: 10.14429/djlit.31.2.865.

Vinkler, Peter. Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(3), 629-642. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0123-z.

Vinkler, Peter. General performance indexes calculated for research institutes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences based on scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 1998, 41(1-2), 185-200. DOI: 10.1007/BF02457977.

Vinkler, Peter. The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2010

Visakhi, P. & Gupta, Ritu. Contribution and impact of faculty and scholars of IISER Mohali: A scientometric study, 2008-12. Libr. Philos. Pract., 2013, 1025, 1-16.

Wadhwa, N.K; Tewari, D.K.; Walke, R.; yadav, A.K. & Dhawan, S.M. Bibliometric analysis of NPL papers published during 1981-1985 and 2001-2005: Case study. In H. Kretschmer & Havemann (Eds.): Proceedings of WIS, Berlin, 2008.

Waltman, L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(2), 365-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007.

Wani, Zahid Ashraf; Pandit, Mohd Tahir & Majeed, Nighat. Research productivity of Indian Institute of Technology. Int. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2013, 5(7), 216-224.

Wildgaard, L.; Schneider, J.W. & Larsen, B. A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(1), 125-158. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1423-3.

Wilson, Pauline. Factors effecting research productivity. J. Educ. Libr., 1979, 20(1), 3-24.

Yankevich, W.F. Analysis of publication and invention productivity in some Soviet academic institutions. Scientometrics, 1982, 4(6), 431-437. DOI: 10.1007/BF02021139.

Zachos, Georgios. Research output evaluation of two university departments in Greece with the use of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 1991, 21(2), 195-221. DOI: 10.1007/BF02017569.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item