Thirteen years of Indian Journal of Animal Research: A Scientometric view

Bankar, Ravindra S and Lihitkar, Shalini R Thirteen years of Indian Journal of Animal Research: A Scientometric view., 2021 . In Conference: International Conference of Agricultural Librarians & Users Community (ICALUC-2021), University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru (Karnataka), 26 Feb 2021. [Conference paper]

[thumbnail of Conf Paper.pdf]
Preview
 Text
Conf Paper.pdf
Download (351kB) | Preview

English abstract

The study involves a scientometric analysis of journal- Indian Journal of Animal Research (IJAR). Data was sourced from Scopus (Elsevier) for the study. Total 1890 records were retrieved and analyzed from coverage years 2008 to 2020. The study reveals various comprehensive bibliometric aspects like annual research growth (research yield), document types, renowned authors and their contributions, most cited documents, contributing affiliations and countries.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Scientometrics, Science Mapping, Indian Journal of Animal Research (IJAR), Research Growth and Trends, Research Metrics, Bibliometrics, Scopus, etc.
Subjects: A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AA. Library and information science as a field.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
Depositing user: Ravindra Bankar
Date deposited: 30 Mar 2021 02:49
Last modified: 30 Mar 2021 02:49
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/41830

References

1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2016). Biblioshiny (3.0) [Computer software]. https://www.bibliometrix.org/

2. Aria, M., and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

3. Garfield. (n.d.). HistCite. Clarivate Analytics. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/

4. Kraus, J. R. (2005). Comparing journal use between biology faculty and undergraduate students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 43. http://www.istl.org/05-summer/article2.html?a_aid=3598aabf

5. Microsoft. (2018). Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Corporation. https://office.microsoft.com/excel

6. Patra, S. K., and Mishra, S. (2006). Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature. Scientometrics, 67(3), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.9

7. Simon, R. M. (2011). Explaining the Differential Outcomes of Research Topics: Productivity and Institutional Outcomes in Four Sciences. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/12420

8. Raja, S., and Balasubramani, R. (2011). Plasmodium falciparum research publication in India: A scientometric analysis. European Journal of Scientific Research,56(3),294-300. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289964868_Plasmodium_falciparum_research_publication_in_India_A_scientometric_analysis


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS